{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,16]],"date-time":"2026-10-16T22:36:14Z","timestamp":1792190174050,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":11,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,10,20]],"date-time":"2014-10-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1413763200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["BJU International"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      To compare percutaneous nephrostomy (\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCN<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      ) tube vs\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">JJ<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      ureteric stenting as the initial urinary drainage method in children with obstructive calcular anuria (\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">OCA<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      ) and post\u2010renal acute renal failure (\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ARF<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      ) due to bilateral ureteric calculi, to identify the selection criteria for the initial urinary drainage method that will improve urinary drainage, decrease complications and facilitate the subsequent definitive clearance of stones, as this comparison is lacking in the literature.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Patients and Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A series of 90 children aged \u226412 years presenting with\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">OCA<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      and\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ARF<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      due to bilateral ureteric calculi were included from\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">M<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      arch 2011 to\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">S<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      eptember 2013 at\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">C<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      airo\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">U<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      niversity\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">P<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      ediatric\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">H<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      ospital in this randomised comparative study. Patients with grade 0\u20131 hydronephrosis, fever or pyonephrosis were excluded. No patient had any contraindication for either method of drainage. Stable patients (or patients stabilised by dialysis) were randomised (non\u2010blinded, block randomisation, sealed envelope method) into\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCN<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      \u2010tube or bilateral\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">JJ<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      \u2010stent groups (45 patients for each group). Initial urinary drainage was performed under general anaesthesia and fluoroscopic guidance. We used 4.8\u20136 F\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">JJ<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      stents or 6\u20138 F\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCN<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      tubes. The primary outcomes were the safety and efficacy of both groups for the recovery of renal functions. Both groups were compared for operative and imaging times, complications, and the period required for a return to normal serum creatinine levels. The secondary outcomes included the number of subsequent interventions needed for clearance of stones. Additional analysis was done for factors affecting outcome within each group.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      All presented patients completed the study with intention\u2010to\u2010treat analysis. There was no significant difference between the\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCN<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      \u2010tube and\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">JJ<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      \u2010stent groups for the operative and imaging times, period for return to a normal creatinine level and failure of insertion. There were significantly more complications in the\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCN<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      \u2010tube group. The stone size (&gt;2\u2009cm) was the only factor affecting the rates of mucosal complications, operative time and failure of insertion in the\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">JJ<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      \u2010stent group. The degree of hydronephrosis significantly affected the operative time for\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCN<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      \u2010tube insertion. Grade 2 hydronephrosis was associated with all cases of insertion failure in the\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCN<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      \u2010tube group. The total number of subsequent interventions needed to clear stones was significantly higher in the\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCN<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      \u2010tube group, especially in patients with bilateral stones destined for chemolytic dissolution (alkalinisation) or extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ESWL<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      ).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      We recommend the use of\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">JJ<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      stents for initial urinary drainage for stones that will be subsequently treated with chemolytic dissolution or\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ESWL<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      , as this will lower the total number of subsequent interventions needed to clear the stones. This is also true for stones destined for ureteroscopy (\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">URS<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      ), as\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">JJ<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      \u2010stent insertion will facilitate subsequent\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">URS<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      due to previous ureteric stenting. Mild hydronephrosis will prolong the operative time for\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCN<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      \u2010tube insertion and may increase the incidence of insertion failure. We recommend the use of\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCN<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      tube if the stone size is &gt;2\u2009cm, as there was a greater risk of possible iatrogenic ureteric injury during stenting with these larger ureteric stones in addition to prolongation of operative time with an increased incidence of failure.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.12768","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,4,4]],"date-time":"2014-04-04T05:54:57Z","timestamp":1396590897000},"page":"473-479","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":30,"title":["Ureteric stents vs percutaneous nephrostomy for initial urinary drainage in children with obstructive anuria and acute renal failure due to ureteric calculi: a prospective, randomised study"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"115","author":[{"given":"Mohammed S.","family":"ElSheemy","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Pediatric Urology Aboul\u2010Riche Children's Hospital Cairo University  Cairo Egypt"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ahmed M.","family":"Shouman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Pediatric Urology Aboul\u2010Riche Children's Hospital Cairo University  Cairo Egypt"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ahmed I.","family":"Shoukry","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Pediatric Urology Aboul\u2010Riche Children's Hospital Cairo University  Cairo Egypt"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ahmed","family":"ElShenoufy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Pediatric Urology Aboul\u2010Riche Children's Hospital Cairo University  Cairo Egypt"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Waseem","family":"Aboulela","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Pediatric Urology Aboul\u2010Riche Children's Hospital Cairo University  Cairo Egypt"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kareem","family":"Daw","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Pediatric Urology Aboul\u2010Riche Children's Hospital Cairo University  Cairo Egypt"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ahmed A.","family":"Hussein","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Pediatric Urology Aboul\u2010Riche Children's Hospital Cairo University  Cairo Egypt"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hany A.","family":"Morsi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Pediatric Urology Aboul\u2010Riche Children's Hospital Cairo University  Cairo Egypt"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hesham","family":"Badawy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Pediatric Urology Aboul\u2010Riche Children's Hospital Cairo University  Cairo Egypt"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,10,20]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_8_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.12161"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(01)62511-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)66434-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02012459"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1464-410x.1999.00159.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_7_1","first-page":"8","article-title":"Bilateral same\u2010session ureteroscopy: its efficacy and safety for diagnosis and treatment","volume":"2","author":"Darabi M","year":"2005","journal-title":"Urol J"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2008.05.041"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/089277903772036190"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpurol.2009.03.024"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpurol.2013.05.003"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpurol.2011.02.011"}],"container-title":["BJU International"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fbju.12768","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fbju.12768","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/bju.12768","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,29]],"date-time":"2025-10-29T12:28:54Z","timestamp":1761740934000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/bju.12768"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,10,20]]},"references-count":11,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/bju.12768"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bju.12768","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1464-4096","1464-410X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1464-4096","type":"print"},{"value":"1464-410X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,10,20]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2014-10-20","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}