{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,7]],"date-time":"2026-09-07T11:14:40Z","timestamp":1788779680828,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,25]],"date-time":"2016-08-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1472083200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"funder":[{"name":"Central Coast Urology Research and Education Fund"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["BJU International"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To determine if portable video media (PVM) improves patient's knowledge and satisfaction acquired during the consent process for cystoscopy and insertion of a ureteric stent compared to standard verbal communication (SVC), as informed consent is a crucial component of patient care and PVM is an emerging technology that may help improve the consent process.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Patients and Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      In this multi\u2010centre randomised controlled crossover trial, patients requiring cystoscopy and stent insertion were recruited from two major teaching hospitals in Australia over a 15\u2010month period (July 2014\u2013December 2015). Patient information delivery was via PVM and SVC. The PVM consisted of an audio\u2010visual presentation with cartoon animation presented on an iPad. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the validated Client Satisfaction Questionnaire 8 (CSQ\u20108; maximum score 32) and knowledge was tested using a true\/false questionnaire (maximum score 28). Questionnaires were completed after first intervention and after crossover. Scores were analysed using the independent samples\n                      <jats:italic>t<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2010test and Wilcoxon signed\u2010rank test for the crossover analysis.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      In all, 88 patients were recruited. A significant 3.1 point (15.5%) increase in understanding was demonstrable favouring the use of PVM (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; 0.001). There was no difference in patient satisfaction between the groups as judged by the CSQ\u20108. A significant 3.6 point (17.8%) increase in knowledge score was seen when the SVC group were crossed over to the PVM arm. A total of 80.7% of patients preferred PVM and 19.3% preferred SVC. Limitations include the lack of a validated questionnaire to test knowledge acquired from the interventions.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study demonstrates patients' preference towards PVM in the urological consent process of cystoscopy and ureteric stent insertion. PVM improves patient's understanding compared with SVC and is a more effective means of content delivery to patients in terms of overall preference and knowledge gained during the consent process.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.13595","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,21]],"date-time":"2016-07-21T03:34:44Z","timestamp":1469072084000},"page":"823-828","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":55,"title":["The use of portable video media vs standard verbal communication in the urological consent process: a multicentre, randomised controlled, crossover trial"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"118","author":[{"given":"Matthew","family":"Winter","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Gosford District Hospital Gosford NSW Australia"},{"name":"Royal North Shore Hospital NSW Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jonathan","family":"Kam","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Gosford District Hospital Gosford NSW Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sunny","family":"Nalavenkata","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Hornsby Ku\u2010Ring Gai Hospital Hornsby NSW Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ellen","family":"Hardy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Gosford District Hospital Gosford NSW Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marcus","family":"Handmer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Gosford District Hospital Gosford NSW Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hannah","family":"Ainsworth","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Gosford District Hospital Gosford NSW Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wai Gin","family":"Lee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Gosford District Hospital Gosford NSW Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mark","family":"Louie\u2010Johnsun","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Gosford District Hospital Gosford NSW Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_9_2_1","volume-title":"Consent: Patients and Doctors Making Decisions Together","author":"General Medical Council","year":"2001"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_3_1","volume-title":"General Guidelines for Medical Practitioners on Providing Information to Patients","author":"National Health and Medical Research Council","year":"2004"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2133.2010.10067.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_5_1","first-page":"271","article-title":"Informed consent: is it really understood?","volume":"3","author":"Gongal R","year":"2005","journal-title":"Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ)"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0733-8635(05)70316-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_7_1","first-page":"19","article-title":"Written discharge advice sheets reduce visits to the general practitioner","volume":"78","author":"Raine C","year":"1996","journal-title":"Ann R Coll Surg Engl"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1532-5415.2009.02346.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/tmj.2009.0055"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aeq002"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2354.2007.00846.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0027-9684(15)30853-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(98)10495-6"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cnur.2008.10.014"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4314\/eamj.v81i7.9186"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejcnurse.2008.04.002"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10900-009-9153-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1293","DOI":"10.1002\/j.0022-0337.2009.73.11.tb04821.x","article-title":"Evidence\u2010based patient education: knowledge transfer to endodontic patients","volume":"73","author":"Sorrell JT","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Dent Educ"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/intqhc\/mzn025"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejcts.2005.05.006"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archinte.163.1.83"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_22_1","first-page":"U355","article-title":"Patients' perception of the adequacy of informed consent: a pilot study of elective general surgical patients in Auckland","volume":"116","author":"McKeague M","year":"2003","journal-title":"N Z Med J"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2010.08.007"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_24_1","first-page":"CD009445","article-title":"Interventions to promote informed consent for patients undergoing surgical and other invasive healthcare procedures","volume":"7","author":"Kinnersley P","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/19325037.2009.10599097"}],"container-title":["BJU International"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fbju.13595","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/bju.13595","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,29]],"date-time":"2025-10-29T07:52:28Z","timestamp":1761724348000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/bju.13595"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,25]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/bju.13595"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bju.13595","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1464-4096","1464-410X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1464-4096","type":"print"},{"value":"1464-410X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,25]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2016-08-25","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}