{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,31]],"date-time":"2026-01-31T05:35:25Z","timestamp":1769837725812,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,8,17]],"date-time":"2015-08-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1439769600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Clin Implant Dent Rel Res"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,6]]},"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>The aim of the present 1\u2010year clinical and radiographic study was to evaluate a hydrophilic dental implant when used in everyday cases in one clinic. The purpose was also to compare augmented with nonaugmented sites.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>Materials and Methods<\/jats:title>The study group consisted of 50 consecutive patients treated with 159 dental implants (P<\/jats:styled-content>roactive, N<\/jats:styled-content>eoss L<\/jats:styled-content>td, H<\/jats:styled-content>arrogate, UK<\/jats:styled-content>) in both mandibles and maxillae. Ninety\u2010two implants were placed with adjunct bone augmentation procedures, whereas 40 implants were placed in augmented maxillary sinus sites. A two\u2010stage procedure was used for 84 implants and a one\u2010stage procedure for 47 implants. Twenty\u2010eight implants were immediately loaded. Implant stability was measured with resonance frequency analysis (RFA<\/jats:styled-content>) at placement and at prosthesis delivery. The patients were scheduled for checkups after 6 and 12 months in function with clinical and radiographic examinations. Marginal bone level measurements were performed in baseline and follow\u2010up intraoral radiographs.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>Results<\/jats:title>Two implant failures in two patients were experienced after 1 year of loading, giving a survival rate of 98.7%. One implant in nonaugmented sites and one implant in conjunction with an augmentation procedure (sinus lift), giving a survival rate of 98.5% and 98.9% for healed and augmented sites, respectively (NS<\/jats:styled-content>). RFA<\/jats:styled-content> measurements showed 70.2\u2009\u00b1\u20099.5 ISQ<\/jats:styled-content> at placement and 76.5\u2009\u00b1\u20095.9 ISQ<\/jats:styled-content> (p<\/jats:italic>\u2009\u2264\u20090.001) after a mean healing time of 5.6\u2009\u00b1\u20091.6 months. The marginal bone loss amounted to 0.7\u2009\u00b1\u20090.7\u2009mm after 1 year of loading. Frequency distribution showed bone gain or less than 1\u2009mm bone loss for the majority of implants (69.3%), whereas 25.7% showed 1.1 to 2\u2009mm, 5.0% more than 2\u2009mm and no implants more than 3\u2009mm of bone loss.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>Conclusions<\/jats:title>The use of N<\/jats:styled-content>eoss P<\/jats:styled-content>roactive implants for prosthetic rehabilitation of consecutive patients resulted in predictable clinical and radiographic outcomes after 1 year of loading with no differences between augmented and nonaugmented sites.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/cid.12329","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,8,17]],"date-time":"2015-08-17T07:12:51Z","timestamp":1439795571000},"page":"498-506","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["A 1\u2010Year Clinical and Radiographic Study on Hydrophilic Dental Implants Placed with and without Bone Augmentation Procedures"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"18","author":[{"given":"Thomas","family":"Zumstein","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Zumstein Dental Clinic AG Luzern Switzerland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lars","family":"Sennerby","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Institute for Odontology Sahlgrenska Academy Gothenburg University Gothenburg Sweden"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,8,17]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_5_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joms.2009.03.042"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-051X.2008.01269.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1532-3382(12)70029-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0757.2008.00265.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00079.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0722.2008.00571.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_8_1","first-page":"63","article-title":"On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions","volume":"25","author":"Wennerberg A","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jbm.b.31233"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_10_1","unstructured":"LekholmU ZarbGA.Patient selection and preparation. In:Br\u00e5nemarkPI ZarbGA AlbrektssonT eds. Tissue\u2010integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry.Chicago IL:Quintessence 1985:199\u2013209."},{"key":"e_1_2_5_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/cid.12183"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2009.01775.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1708-8208.2007.00074.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0501.2000.011006530.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/154405910408300704"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2007.070157"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bone.2009.03.662"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1708-8208.2010.00286.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0757.2008.00267.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1708-8208.2010.00273.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_21_1","first-page":"326","article-title":"Can resonance frequency analysis predict failure risk of immediately loaded implants?","volume":"25","author":"Atieh MA","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int J Prosthodont"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2004.01036.x"}],"container-title":["Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fcid.12329","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/cid.12329","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,4]],"date-time":"2023-10-04T01:25:38Z","timestamp":1696382738000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/cid.12329"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,8,17]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,6]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/cid.12329"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/cid.12329","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1523-0899","1708-8208"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1523-0899","type":"print"},{"value":"1708-8208","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,8,17]]}}}