{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,14]],"date-time":"2026-05-14T04:11:36Z","timestamp":1778731896424,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,4,17]],"date-time":"2013-04-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1366156800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Clinical Oral Implants Res"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title><jats:p>Graft resorption remains a major disadvantage of the various employed materials in maxillary sinus augmentation. Our aim was to assess the percentage of graft volume reduction in deproteinized bovine bone (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DBB<\/jats:styled-content>) using cone beam computed tomography (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CBCT<\/jats:styled-content>).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Materials and Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>A retrospective analysis of 29 augmented sinuses in 19 patients was conducted. The graft material was either<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DBB<\/jats:styled-content>alone or<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DBB<\/jats:styled-content>mixed with autologous bone chips (80%<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DBB<\/jats:styled-content>\/20% bone chips).<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CBCT<\/jats:styled-content>scans of the augmented sinuses were obtained pre\u2010 and post\u2010operatively up to 2\u2010year follow\u2010up.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>In total, 55 dental implants were placed in the posterior maxillary region following sinus augmentation. The mean height of the alveolar ridge pre\u2010operative was 2.7\u00a0\u00b1\u00a01.2\u00a0mm and post\u2010operative was 14.13\u00a0\u00b1\u00a04.6\u00a0mm. The mean percentages of alveolar ridge height reduction were 18.58% (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SD<\/jats:styled-content>14.23%) and 27.62% (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SD<\/jats:styled-content>12.70%), and the mean percentages of graft volume reduction were 19.30% (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SD<\/jats:styled-content>9.19%) and 19.85% (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SD<\/jats:styled-content>9.61%) for<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DBB<\/jats:styled-content>and<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DBB<\/jats:styled-content>\u00a0+\u00a0bone chips, respectively.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title><jats:p>The results indicate that<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DBB<\/jats:styled-content>graft volume resorption is approximately (20\u00a0\u00b1\u00a010%) following 2\u2010year follow\u2010up.<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CBCT<\/jats:styled-content>is a useful radiographic tool to follow\u2010up changes in sinus graft volumes.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.12174","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,4,18]],"date-time":"2013-04-18T02:45:42Z","timestamp":1366253142000},"page":"781-785","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":36,"title":["A retrospective analysis of the resorption rate of deproteinized bovine bone as maxillary sinus graft material on cone beam computed tomography"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"25","author":[{"given":"S.","family":"Umanjec\u2010Korac","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Implantology and Prosthodontics Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA) Amsterdam The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"G.","family":"Wu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Implantology and Prosthodontics Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA) Amsterdam The Netherlands"},{"name":"Research Institute MOVE VU University Amsterdam The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"B.","family":"Hassan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Implantology and Prosthodontics Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA) Amsterdam The Netherlands"},{"name":"Department of Implantology and Prosthodontics Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA) Amsterdam The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Y.","family":"Liu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Implantology and Prosthodontics Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA) Amsterdam The Netherlands"},{"name":"Research Institute MOVE VU University Amsterdam The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"D.","family":"Wismeijer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Implantology and Prosthodontics Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA) Amsterdam The Netherlands"},{"name":"Research Institute MOVE VU University Amsterdam The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,4,17]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joms.2008.06.021"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"686","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2008.01539.x-i2","article-title":"Histomorphometric assessment of bone formation in sinus augmentation utilizing a combination of autologous and hydroxyapatite\/biphasic tricalcium phosphate graft materials: at 6 and 9\u00a0months in humans","volume":"19","author":"Artzi Z.","year":"2008","journal-title":"Clinical Oral Implants Research"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2011.02408.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joms.2008.11.023"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2008.01565.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2008.01536.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joen.2009.01.023"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/joms.2002.30576"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijom.2004.09.009"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1259\/dmfr\/27670911"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1259\/dmfr.20120075"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.dmfr.4600601"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2007.01487.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2011.02342.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2006.08.024"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/ID.0b013e318166ce3c"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tripleo.2010.09.064"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joms.2008.09.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1054\/ijom.2001.0197"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_21_1","first-page":"45","article-title":"Bone grafts and Branemark implants in the treatment of the severely resorbed maxilla: a 2\u2010year longitudinal study","volume":"8","author":"Nystrom E.","year":"1993","journal-title":"The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jbm.b.30196"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_23_1","first-page":"1438","article-title":"Reliability of voxel gray values in cone beam computed tomography for pre\u2010operative implant planning assessment","volume":"27","author":"Parsa A.","year":"2012","journal-title":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joms.2010.12.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2009.01817.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2006.01303.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2005.01182.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-051X.2003.01099.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"206","DOI":"10.1016\/S0011-8532(22)02107-3","article-title":"Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions","volume":"30","author":"Tatum H.","year":"1986","journal-title":"Dental Clinics of North America"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2009.01697.x"}],"container-title":["Clinical Oral Implants Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fclr.12174","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/clr.12174","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,9]],"date-time":"2024-05-09T05:05:23Z","timestamp":1715231123000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/clr.12174"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,4,17]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,7]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/clr.12174"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/clr.12174","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0905-7161","1600-0501"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0905-7161","type":"print"},{"value":"1600-0501","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,4,17]]}}}