{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,24]],"date-time":"2026-06-24T22:36:26Z","timestamp":1782340586426,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":42,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,4,2]],"date-time":"2014-04-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1396396800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Clinical Oral Implants Res"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background<\/jats:title><jats:p>Minimizing crestal bone loss following immediate implant placement is considered the most challenging aspect in implant therapy. Implant surface topography and chemical modifications have been shown to influence the success of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">O<\/jats:styled-content>sseointegration. The <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">S<\/jats:styled-content>traumann<jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup> <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">B<\/jats:styled-content>one <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">L<\/jats:styled-content>evel implant, featuring <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SLA<\/jats:styled-content>ctive surface, has been introduced with the aim of enhancing bone apposition. Similarly, the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">O<\/jats:styled-content>sseo<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">S<\/jats:styled-content>peed\u2122 implants from <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">A<\/jats:styled-content>stra <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">T<\/jats:styled-content>ech claim to have an enhanced osseointegration. Because of the specific features in the implant design, both companies claim that crestal resorption is minimal with these implants.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p>To evaluate the osseointegration and crestal bone level following immediate placement of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">S<\/jats:styled-content>traumann<jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup> <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">B<\/jats:styled-content>one <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">L<\/jats:styled-content>evel implant and <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">O<\/jats:styled-content>sseo<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">S<\/jats:styled-content>peed\u2122 implants in fresh extraction sockets in <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">B<\/jats:styled-content>eagle dogs.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Method<\/jats:title><jats:p>The distal roots of the second, third and fourth premolars were extracted in both sides of the mandible. The distal roots were removed using a dental elevator. A total of 60 fixtures were installed in 10 <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">B<\/jats:styled-content>eagle dogs. Two types of implants were used: <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">S<\/jats:styled-content>traumann<jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup> Bone\u2010Level implants, which were 8\u00a0\u00d7\u00a03.3\u00a0mm in size, and <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">A<\/jats:styled-content>stra <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">T<\/jats:styled-content>ech <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">O<\/jats:styled-content>sseo<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">S<\/jats:styled-content>peed\u2122 3.5 <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">S M<\/jats:styled-content>icro<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">T<\/jats:styled-content>hread\u2122 implants, which were 8\u00a0\u00d7\u00a03.5\u00a0mm in size. The histomorphometrical evaluation was performed at the end of 4\u2010 and 12\u2010week healing. The implant\u2013bone contact and bone volume percentage were assessed.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>The bone\u2010to\u2010implant contact (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BIC<\/jats:styled-content>) and the bone volume did not show any significant changes for both types of implants. The <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">O<\/jats:styled-content>sseo<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">S<\/jats:styled-content>peed\u2122 implants showed 67.4% and 65.3% <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BIC<\/jats:styled-content>, respectively, at 4 and 12\u00a0weeks compared with 71.7 and 73.1 for the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">S<\/jats:styled-content>traumann<jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup> Bone\u2010Level implants. The bone volume around both types of implants did not differ significantly at both time periods. The crestal bone resorption was observed for both types of implants. The first <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BIC<\/jats:styled-content> at buccal side and lingual side of the implants also did not differ significantly for both implant systems.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title><jats:p>This study showed that <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">S<\/jats:styled-content>traumann<jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup> <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">B<\/jats:styled-content>one <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">L<\/jats:styled-content>evel and <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">O<\/jats:styled-content>sseo<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">S<\/jats:styled-content>peed\u2122 implants induced similar bone response after immediate implantation at 4 and 12\u00a0weeks. The immediate implant placement resulted in peri\u2010implant crestal bone\u2010level changes for both types of implants.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.12388","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,4,2]],"date-time":"2014-04-02T05:13:19Z","timestamp":1396415599000},"page":"1106-1112","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":22,"title":["Bone morphology changes around two types of bone\u2010level implants installed in fresh extraction sockets \u2013 a histomorphometric study in <scp>B<\/scp>eagle dogs"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"26","author":[{"given":"Hend M.","family":"Alharbi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Periodontics and Community Dentistry College of Dentistry King Saud University Riyadh Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nadir","family":"Babay","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Periodontics and Community Dentistry College of Dentistry King Saud University Riyadh Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hamad","family":"Alzoman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Periodontics and Community Dentistry College of Dentistry King Saud University Riyadh Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sumaya","family":"Basudan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Endodontics Division Restorative Dental Department College of Dentistry King Saud University Riyadh Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6440-8780","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sukumaran","family":"Anil","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Periodontics and Community Dentistry College of Dentistry King Saud University Riyadh Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"John A.","family":"Jansen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Biomaterials Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands"},{"name":"Dental Implant and Osseointegration Research Chair (DIORC) College of Dentistry King Saud University Riyadh Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,4,2]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2007.01454.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2009.01783.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1708-8208.2011.00403.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2010.02055.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2011.110569"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-051X.2005.00726.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2006.01315.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2006.01309.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0501.2003.00972.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-051X.2011.01747.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-051X.2008.01237.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.12010"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_1","first-page":"1109","article-title":"A retrospective analysis of patients referred for implant placement to a specialty clinic: indications, surgical procedures, and early failures","volume":"23","author":"Bornstein M.M.","year":"2008","journal-title":"The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-051X.2004.00565.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/154405910408300704"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/08959374990130010501"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2009.01841.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00016356709072522"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0501.2002.130204.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.biomaterials.2005.07.009"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2010.02060.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_24_1","first-page":"659","article-title":"Improved retention and bone\u2010to\u2010implant contact with fluoride\u2010modified titanium implants","volume":"19","author":"Ellingsen J.E.","year":"2004","journal-title":"The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2009.01825.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2011.02370.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2012.02513.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2010.100237"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2009.01777.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_30_1","first-page":"55","article-title":"Comparison of immediate and delayed implantation using the square\u2010threaded and resorbable\u2010blasted\u2010media\u2010treated surface implant system","volume":"21","author":"Kim J. H.","year":"2007","journal-title":"In vivo (Athens, Greece)"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_31_1","first-page":"332","article-title":"Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: surgical and restorative advantages","volume":"9","author":"Lazzara R.J.","year":"1989","journal-title":"The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.1999.70.11.1330"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2010.02123.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_34_1","first-page":"19","article-title":"A study of the fate of the buccal wall of extraction sockets of teeth with prominent roots","volume":"26","author":"Nevins M.","year":"2006","journal-title":"The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_35_1","first-page":"377","article-title":"Histomorphometric analysis of the bone\u2010implant contact obtained with 4 different implant surface treatments placed side by side in the dog mandible","volume":"17","author":"Novaes A.B.","year":"2002","journal-title":"The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_36_1","first-page":"203","article-title":"How does the timing of implant placement to extraction affect outcome?","volume":"22","author":"Quirynen M.","year":"2007","journal-title":"The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-051X.2006.01008.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-051X.2010.01533.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_39_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.1966.37.2.117"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_40_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-051X.2009.01439.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_41_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.1963.34.6.487"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_42_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.1972.43.3.141"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_43_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jbm.a.30320"}],"container-title":["Clinical Oral Implants Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fclr.12388","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/clr.12388","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,3]],"date-time":"2023-10-03T21:07:29Z","timestamp":1696367249000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/clr.12388"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,4,2]]},"references-count":42,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,9]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/clr.12388"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/clr.12388","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0905-7161","1600-0501"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0905-7161","type":"print"},{"value":"1600-0501","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,4,2]]}}}