{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,8]],"date-time":"2026-02-08T01:20:58Z","timestamp":1770513658032,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":45,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"11","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,9,29]],"date-time":"2016-09-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1475107200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000925","name":"National Health and Medical Research Council","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["APP1056633"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["APP1056633"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000925","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Clinical Oral Implants Res"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p>To assess the impact of a hydrophilic implant surface (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SLA<\/jats:styled-content>ctive<jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup>) placed into augmented maxillary sinuses on bone\u2010to\u2010implant contact (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BIC<\/jats:styled-content>) and surrounding tissue composition when compared to a hydrophobic surface (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SLA<\/jats:styled-content><jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup>).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Material and methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>Four sheep underwent bilateral sinus augmentation. Each sinus received anorganic bovine bone mineral\u00a0+\u00a0autogenous bone (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ABBM<\/jats:styled-content>\u00a0+\u00a0<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">AB<\/jats:styled-content>). Sixteen implants were subsequently placed 12\u00a0weeks postgrafting with each sinus receiving a control (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SLA<\/jats:styled-content><jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup>) and test implant (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SLA<\/jats:styled-content>ctive<jats:sup>\u00ae<\/jats:sup>). Two animals were sacrificed at 2\u00a0weeks and another two animals were sacrificed at 4\u00a0weeks postimplantation. The eight sinuses and 16 implants were processed for histomorphometry, which assessed bone\u2010to\u2010implant contact (%<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BIC<\/jats:styled-content>) and tissue elements (woven bone \u2013<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">WB<\/jats:styled-content>, lamellar bone \u2013<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">LB<\/jats:styled-content>, soft tissue \u2013<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ST<\/jats:styled-content>) in the interthread region of implants within the augmented sinus.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>There was a statistically significant increase in %<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BIC<\/jats:styled-content>at week 4 compared to the week 2 animals in both test (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u00a0&lt;\u00a00.005) and control (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u00a0&lt;\u00a00.005) groups. There was a statistically significant greater %<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BIC<\/jats:styled-content>around test implants when compared to control implants in both week 2 (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u00a0&lt;\u00a00.05) and week 4 animals (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u00a0&lt;\u00a00.05). Greater %<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">WB<\/jats:styled-content>(11.17% \u00b16.82) and %<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">LB<\/jats:styled-content>(11.06% \u00b13.67) were seen in the test implants when compared to the control implants independent of time. This was only statistically significant for %<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">LB<\/jats:styled-content>(<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u00a0&lt;\u00a00.05). A statistically significant reduction of 16.78% (\u00b16.19) in %<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ST<\/jats:styled-content>was noted in test implants when compared to control implants (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u00a0&lt;\u00a00.05) independent of time.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Both time and the use of hydrophilic implant surface had a positive impact on %<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BIC<\/jats:styled-content>around implants placed into augmented maxillary sinuses. Hydrophilic implant surfaces also had a positive impact on surrounding tissue composition. Larger trials are needed to better assess and detect differences between these two surfaces in augmented maxillary sinuses.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.12988","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,9,29]],"date-time":"2016-09-29T05:19:31Z","timestamp":1475126371000},"page":"1325-1333","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":31,"title":["Comparison of early osseointegration of SLA<sup>\u00ae<\/sup>and SLActive<sup>\u00ae<\/sup>implants in maxillary sinus augmentation: a pilot study"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"28","author":[{"given":"Jamil","family":"Alayan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Dentistry and Oral Health Centre for Medicine and Oral Health Menzies Health Institute Queensland Griffith University Southport Australia"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Cedryck","family":"Vaquette","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Institute for Health and Biomedical Innovation Queensland University of Technology Kelvin Grove Australia"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Siamak","family":"Saifzadeh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Institute for Health and Biomedical Innovation Queensland University of Technology Kelvin Grove Australia"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Dietmar","family":"Hutmacher","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Institute for Health and Biomedical Innovation Queensland University of Technology Kelvin Grove Australia"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Saso","family":"Ivanovski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Dentistry and Oral Health Centre for Medicine and Oral Health Menzies Health Institute Queensland Griffith University Southport Australia"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,9,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2004.01082.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.12652"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2007.01518.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2010.090686"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2010.02107.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/154405910408300704"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_1","first-page":"611","article-title":"Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs","volume":"13","author":"Buser D.","year":"1998","journal-title":"International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_1","first-page":"25","article-title":"Early loading of implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla: lateral sinus lift with autogenous bone and bio\u2010oss versus crestal mini sinus lift and 8\u2010mm hydroxyapatite\u2010coated implants. A randomised controlled clinical trial","volume":"2","author":"Cannizzaro G.","year":"2009","journal-title":"European Journal of Oral Implantology"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-4636(199804)40:1<1::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-Q"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0714.1982.tb00172.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2010.02113.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2008.01557.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_1","first-page":"1037","article-title":"Biomechanical comparison of different surface modifications for dental implants","volume":"23","author":"Ferguson S.J.","year":"2008","journal-title":"International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2009.01814.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.actbio.2014.03.032"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcms.2010.02.010"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_18_1","first-page":"337","article-title":"Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus: a comparative histomorphometric study in sheep","volume":"17","author":"Haas R.","year":"2002","journal-title":"International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0501.1998.090206.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0501.2001.012002135.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00236.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00055.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-9657.2008.00690.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_24_1","first-page":"635","article-title":"A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture","volume":"17","author":"Hallman M.","year":"2002","journal-title":"International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2004.00996.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2012.02438.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2011.02168.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2011.02245.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2009.01777.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pbio.1000412"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tripleo.2008.07.021"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2008.01651.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2011.02172.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_34_1","first-page":"873","article-title":"Treatment of maxillary ridge resorption by sinus augmentation with iliac cancellous bone, anorganic bovine bone, and endosseous implants: a clinical and histologic report","volume":"15","author":"Maiorana C.","year":"2000","journal-title":"International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_35_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1708-8208.2009.00204.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.12255"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jbm.a.30518"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2009.01738.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_39_1","first-page":"211","article-title":"Histological findings in guided bone regeneration (gbr) around titanium dental implants with autogenous bone chips using a new resorbable membrane","volume":"8","author":"Schlegel A.K.","year":"1998","journal-title":"Journal of Long\u2010Term Effects of Medical Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_40_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tripleo.2005.09.011"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_41_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-051X.2007.01159.x","article-title":"Bone regeneration in dehiscence\u2010type defects at non\u2010submerged and submerged chemically modified (slactive) and conventional sla titanium implants: an immunohistochemical study in dogs","volume":"35","author":"Schwarz F.","year":"2008","journal-title":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_42_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jbm.b.31233"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_43_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2009.01877.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_44_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2009.01775.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_45_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.2147\/CCIDE.S15949","article-title":"Current knowledge about the hydrophilic and nanostructured slactive surface","volume":"3","author":"Wennerberg A.","year":"2011","journal-title":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_46_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jbm.a.30320"}],"container-title":["Clinical Oral Implants Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fclr.12988","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fclr.12988","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/clr.12988","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,19]],"date-time":"2024-06-19T17:16:12Z","timestamp":1718817372000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/clr.12988"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,9,29]]},"references-count":45,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,11]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/clr.12988"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/clr.12988","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0905-7161","1600-0501"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0905-7161","type":"print"},{"value":"1600-0501","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,9,29]]}}}