{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,16]],"date-time":"2026-10-16T02:34:08Z","timestamp":1792118048678,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":3,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"S15","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,2]],"date-time":"2018-03-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1519948800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":1,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100007619","name":"Osteology Foundation","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100007619","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Clinical Oral Implants Res"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title><jats:p>Working Group 2 at the 2nd Consensus Meeting of the Osteology Foundation had a focus on the influence of vertical implant placement on papilla height at single implants adjacent to teeth and on the inter\u2010implant mucosa fill at two adjacent implants in the anterior maxilla.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Materials and methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>Two systematic reviews were prepared in advance of the consensus meeting. Due to the heterogeneity among the studies with regard to study design, study population, method of assessment, meta\u2010analyses were not possible. Consensus statements, clinical recommendations, and implications for future research were based on structured group discussions until consensus was reached among the entire expert group.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>The systematic review about single\u2010tooth implants included a total of 12 studies demonstrating that the vertical distance from the crestal bone level to the base of the interproximal contact point varied considerably from 2\u00a0mm up to 11\u00a0mm, and a partial or complete papilla fill was reached in 56.5% to 100% of the cases. For the systematic review regarding two adjacent implants, only four studies reported on horizontal inter\u2010implant distances which ranged between 2.0 and 4.0\u00a0mm. More than half of the papilla presence was indicated in 21% to 88.5% of the cases.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title><jats:p>It was concluded that for single\u2010tooth implants, the papilla height between an implant and a tooth is predominantly dependent on the clinical attachment level of the tooth. In cases with two adjacent implants, it was concluded that it is not possible to define the optimal horizontal distance between two adjacent implants restored with fixed dental prosthess.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.13113","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,2]],"date-time":"2018-03-02T03:30:13Z","timestamp":1519961413000},"page":"14-17","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":37,"title":["Evidence\u2010based knowledge on the aesthetics and maintenance of peri\u2010implant soft tissues: Osteology Foundation Consensus Report Part 3\u2014Aesthetics of peri\u2010implant soft tissues"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"29","author":[{"given":"Ronald E.","family":"Jung","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science University of Zurich  Zurich Switzerland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lisa","family":"Heitz\u2010Mayfield","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Science International Research Collaborative The University of Western Australia  Perth WA Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Frank","family":"Schwarz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Oral Surgery Universit\u00e4tsklinikum D\u00fcsseldorf  D\u00fcsseldorf Germany"},{"name":"Department of Oral Surgery and Implantology Carolinum Johann Wolfgang Goethe\u2010University Frankfurt  Frankfurt Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"name":"on behalf of the Groups of the\u00a02 Osteology Foundation Consensus Meeting","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,2]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_8_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2009.080435"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2005.01193.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_4_1","first-page":"326","article-title":"Regeneration of gingival papillae after single\u2010implant treatment","volume":"17","author":"Jemt T.","year":"1997","journal-title":"International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry"}],"container-title":["Clinical Oral Implants Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fclr.13113","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/clr.13113","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,12]],"date-time":"2023-09-12T05:37:21Z","timestamp":1694497041000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/clr.13113"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,3]]},"references-count":3,"journal-issue":{"issue":"S15","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/clr.13113"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/clr.13113","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0905-7161","1600-0501"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0905-7161","type":"print"},{"value":"1600-0501","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,3]]}}}