{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,7]],"date-time":"2025-10-07T11:36:03Z","timestamp":1759836963507,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,23]],"date-time":"2018-10-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1540252800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Cytopathology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p>Peer review of equivocal\/abnormal Papanicolaou smears is a standard internal quality assurance measure in cervical cancer screening laboratories. In 2014, we introduced a new method for peer review involving blinding the identity of the first reader. We present the comparison of different measures of inter\u2010reader agreement in 2013 and 2014 in order to measure the impact of blind peer review on possible cognitive biases in reading.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>All suspect slides are proposed for peer review; a single reader's peer reviews are registered independently, with discordant cases discussed for consensus diagnosis. Since 2014, the first reader's name has been blinded to peers. We computed how frequently the initial diagnosis was changed, and how frequently a single reader influenced the final diagnosis when the initial one was changed. We compared \u03ba of the first reader and that of other readers with final diagnosis. Data from 2013 were compared to those of 2014.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>The final diagnosis changed in 22.9% of cases (range 16.8%\u201034.4%) in 2013 and in 26.8% (range 13.9%\u201035.6%) in 2014 (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u00a0=\u00a0.2). Individual peer diagnoses agreed with final diagnosis in 52.3% (range 41.9%\u201066.3%) in 2013 and in 50.2% (range 36.0%\u201065.8%) in 2014 (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = .55). The cytologist having the highest proportion of confirmed diagnoses was also the most influential on final diagnosis, both in 2013 and in 2014. Agreement between first reader and final diagnosis was higher than that of each reader in 2013 and in 2014.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title><jats:p>Blinding the identity of the first reader had little or no impact on inter\u2010reader agreement measures in our laboratory.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/cyt.12637","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,2]],"date-time":"2018-10-02T00:05:22Z","timestamp":1538438722000},"page":"105-108","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["The impact of blind peer review (team reading) of equivocal\/abnormal Papanicolaou smears on inter\u2010reader agreement"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"30","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4867-5990","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Antonio","family":"Placidi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"U.O.C. Oncologic Screening Local Health Unit Roma 2 (Former Roma C) Roma Italy"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Paolo","family":"Giorgi Rossi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Epidemiology Unit Azienda Unit\u00e0 Sanitaria Locale \u2010 IRCCS di Reggio Emilia Reggio Emilia Italy"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_5_2_1","first-page":"203","article-title":"Quality control in the cytology laboratory","volume":"20","author":"Melamed MR","year":"1976","journal-title":"Acta Cytol"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_3_1","first-page":"535","article-title":"Quality control in cytopathology. A system for simultaneous monitoring of accuracy and education and for proficiency testing","volume":"28","author":"Carney CN","year":"1984","journal-title":"Acta Cytol"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2303.1993.tb00069.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"672","DOI":"10.5858\/2000-124-0672-QMIGCU","article-title":"Quality management in gynecologic cytology using interlaboratory comparison","volume":"124","author":"Jones BA","year":"2000","journal-title":"Arch Pathol Lab Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_6_1","unstructured":"American Society of Cytopathology (ASC).Quality Control and Quality Assurance Practices Cervical Cytology Practice Guideline. Approved by the ASC Executive Board November 10 2000.https:\/\/www.cytopathology.org\/quality-control-and-quality-assurance-practices\/. Accessed March 3 2018."},{"key":"e_1_2_5_7_1","unstructured":"Cervical Cytology Practice Guidelines.2002. Prepared by the Hong Kong Society of Cytology Cervical Cytology Practice Guideline Grouphttp:\/\/www.cytology.org.hk\/Download\/Final%20Draft2.pdf. Accessed March 3 2018."},{"key":"e_1_2_5_8_1","unstructured":"BrancaM MorosiniPL MarsanC ColemanD.Quality assurance and continuous quality improvement in laboratories which undertake cervical screening. Leonardo da Vinci project \u2013 CYTOTRAIN 1996\u20102002 Istituto Superiore di Sanit\u00e0 Rome 2002 pp.1\u201039."},{"key":"e_1_2_5_9_1","first-page":"1","article-title":"Raccomandazioni per il controllo di qualit\u00e0 in citologia cervico\u2010vaginale","volume":"28","author":"GISCi","year":"2004","journal-title":"Epidemiol Prev"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/cyt.12195"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_11_1","unstructured":"SmithB MatisicJ HayesM.Quality assurance\/quality control \u2010 Cervical cytology and histopathology. BC Cancer Agency Vancouver BC Canada. 20 May2016.https:\/\/zora.onko-i.si\/fileadmin\/user_upload\/dokumenti\/izobrazevanja\/Cito_histo_delavnice_2016\/predavanja\/QA_QC_Issues_of_Cervical_Cytology.pdf. Accessed March 3 2018."},{"key":"e_1_2_5_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000448370"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2005.04.3661"},{"volume-title":"A Manual for Cervical Cancer Screening and Control: Principles, Practice and New Perspectives","year":"2013","author":"Branca M","key":"e_1_2_5_14_1"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-11074-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_16_1","unstructured":"GISCi.Documento operativo GISCi per l'applicazione dei programmi di screening del sistema Bethesda 2001: Convegno Nazionale GISCi 2006 Roma.http:\/\/www.gisci.it\/documenti\/documenti_gisci\/bethesda.pdf. Accessed March 3 2018."},{"key":"e_1_2_5_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/001316446002000104"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0165-1781(93)90033-D"},{"volume-title":"Stata Statistical Software: Release 13","year":"2013","author":"StataCorp","key":"e_1_2_5_19_1"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/dc.20681"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2303.2010.00753.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000328615"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2303.2001.0373a.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.10921"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2303.2004.00141.x"}],"container-title":["Cytopathology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fcyt.12637","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/cyt.12637","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,14]],"date-time":"2023-09-14T03:04:13Z","timestamp":1694660653000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/cyt.12637"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,23]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/cyt.12637"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/cyt.12637","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0956-5507","1365-2303"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0956-5507"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1365-2303"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,23]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2017-12-12","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2018-10-23","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}