{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,3]],"date-time":"2026-02-03T16:46:38Z","timestamp":1770137198650,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,18]],"date-time":"2017-09-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1505692800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Developing World Bioethics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>One of the most challenging issues in cross\u2010cultural bioethics concerns the long\u2010standing socio\u2010cultural practice of female genital circumcision (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">FGC<\/jats:styled-content>), which is prevalent in many African countries and the Middle East as well as in some Asian and Western countries. It is commonly assumed that <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">FGC<\/jats:styled-content>, in all its versions, constitutes a gross violation of the universal human rights of health, physical integrity, and individual autonomy and hence should be abolished. This article, however, suggests a mediating approach according to which one form of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">FGC<\/jats:styled-content>, the removal of the clitoris foreskin, can be made compatible with the high demands of universal human rights. The argument presupposes the idea that human rights are not absolutist by nature but can be framed in a meaningful, culturally sensitive way. It proposes important limiting conditions that must be met for the practice of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">FGC<\/jats:styled-content> to be considered in accordance with the human rights agenda.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1111\/dewb.12173","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,18]],"date-time":"2017-09-18T14:45:04Z","timestamp":1505745904000},"page":"222-232","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Reconciling female genital circumcision with universal human rights"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"18","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6589-2677","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"John\u2010Stewart","family":"Gordon","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,18]]},"container-title":["Developing World Bioethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fdewb.12173","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/dewb.12173","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,17]],"date-time":"2023-09-17T20:34:08Z","timestamp":1694982848000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/dewb.12173"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,18]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,9]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/dewb.12173"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/dewb.12173","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1471-8731","1471-8847"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1471-8731","type":"print"},{"value":"1471-8847","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,18]]}}}