{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,16]],"date-time":"2024-05-16T19:33:02Z","timestamp":1715887982880},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,2,11]],"date-time":"2016-02-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1455148800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Diabet. Med."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Aims<\/jats:title><jats:p>To describe the proportion of glucose tests with unrecorded provenance in routine primary care data and identify the impact on clinical practice.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>A cross\u2010sectional analysis was conducted of blood glucose measurements from the Royal College of General Practitioner Research and Surveillance Centre database, which includes primary care records from &gt;100 practices across England and Wales. All blood glucose results recorded during 2013 were identified. Tests were grouped by provenance (fasting, oral glucose tolerance test, random, none specified and other). A clinical audit in a single primary care practice was also performed to identify the impact of failing to record glucose provenance on diabetes diagnosis.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>A total of 2 137 098 people were included in the cross\u2010sectional analysis. Of 203 350 recorded glucose measurements the majority (117 893; 58%) did not have any provenance information. The most commonly reported provenance was fasting glucose (75 044; 37%). The distribution of glucose values where provenance was not recorded was most similar to that of fasting samples. The glucose measurements of 256 people with diabetes in the audit practice (size 11 514 people) were analysed. The initial glucose measurement had no provenance information in 164 cases (64.1%). A clinician questioned the provenance of a result in 41 cases (16.0%); of these, 14 (34.1%) required repeating. Lack of provenance led to delays in the diagnosis of diabetes [median (range) 30 (3\u2013614) days].<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title><jats:p>The recording of glucose provenance in <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UK<\/jats:styled-content> primary care could be improved. Failure to record provenance causes unnecessary repeated testing, delayed diagnosis and wasted clinician time.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/dme.13067","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,1,16]],"date-time":"2016-01-16T18:16:14Z","timestamp":1452968174000},"page":"93-98","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Glucose test provenance recording in <scp>UK<\/scp> primary care: was that fasted or random?"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"34","author":[{"given":"A. P.","family":"McGovern","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine University of Surrey Guildford"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"H.","family":"Fieldhouse","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine University of Surrey Guildford"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Z.","family":"Tippu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine University of Surrey Guildford"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"S.","family":"Jones","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine University of Surrey Guildford"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"N.","family":"Munro","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine University of Surrey Guildford"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"S.","family":"de Lusignan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine University of Surrey Guildford"},{"name":"Clinical Innovation and Research Centre Royal College of General Practitioners London UK"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,2,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_9_2_1","volume-title":"Use of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: abbreviated report of a WHO consultation","author":"World Health Organization","year":"2011"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_3_1","first-page":"65","article-title":"Codes, classifications, terminologies and nomenclatures: definition, development and application in practice","volume":"13","author":"Lusignan S","year":"2005","journal-title":"Inform Prim Care"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_4_1","first-page":"63","article-title":"Flagging fasting plasma glucose specimens: time to routinely label the context in which pathology specimens are recorded","volume":"17","author":"Lusignan S","year":"2009","journal-title":"Inform Prim Care"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3399\/bjgp14X676410"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0038-1638748","article-title":"Key concepts to assess the readiness of data for international research: data quality, lineage and provenance, extraction and processing errors, traceability, and curation. Contribution of the IMIA Primary Health Care Informatics Working Group","volume":"6","author":"Lusignan S","year":"2011","journal-title":"Yearb Med Inform"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_7_1","unstructured":"Royal College of General Practitioners.Research and Surveillance Centre 2014; Available athttp:\/\/www.rcgp.org.uk\/clinical-and-research\/our-programmes\/research-and-surveillance-centre.aspxLast accessed 21 January 2016."},{"key":"e_1_2_9_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/ard.2008.096693"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.vaccine.2011.12.038"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0950268808001556"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_11_1","unstructured":"World Health Organization.Definition and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and intermediate hyperglycaemia: report of a WHO\/IDF consultation.2006."},{"key":"e_1_2_9_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-5491.2011.03457.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_13_1","unstructured":"General Medical Council.Guidance on Good Practice: Confidentiality Guidance: Circumstances in which Patients give Implied Consent to Disclosure.2013; (29 September 2014). Available athttp:\/\/www.gmc-uk.org\/guidance\/ethical_guidance\/confidentiality_24_35_disclosing_information_with_consent.aspLast accessed 21 January 2016."},{"key":"e_1_2_9_14_1","unstructured":"National Research Ethics Service.Defining Research2009. Available athttp:\/\/nuhrise.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/Defining-Research-Leaflet.pdfLast accessed 21 January 2016."},{"key":"e_1_2_9_15_1","unstructured":"International Health Terminology Standards Development Organisation (IHTSDE).SNOMED CT The Global Language of Healthcare.2015; Available athttp:\/\/www.ihtsdo.org\/snomed-ctLast accessed 21 January 2016."},{"key":"e_1_2_9_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/fampra\/cmi106"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/qhc.12.2.122"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3414\/ME13-02-0024"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.e7293"}],"container-title":["Diabetic Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fdme.13067","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fdme.13067","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/dme.13067","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,3]],"date-time":"2023-10-03T01:55:37Z","timestamp":1696298137000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/dme.13067"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,2,11]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/dme.13067"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/dme.13067","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0742-3071","1464-5491"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0742-3071","type":"print"},{"value":"1464-5491","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,2,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2016-01-11","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2016-02-11","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}