{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,16]],"date-time":"2026-10-16T19:12:59Z","timestamp":1792177979447,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,2,18]],"date-time":"2017-02-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1487376000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Epilepsia"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:label\/><jats:p>The above article, published online on 18 <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">FEB<\/jats:styled-content> 2017 in Wiley Online Library (<jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" xlink:href=\"http:\/\/wileyonlinelibrary.com\">wileyonlinelibrary.com<\/jats:ext-link>), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editors in Chief, Astrid Nehlig and Michael Sperling, and Wiley Periodicals, Inc. The retraction is because the original paper contained a statistical error and was consequently underpowered, having an inadequate number of subjects to draw the conclusion regarding equivalence of therapies. The aim of the project was worthwhile, but with an insufficient number of patients, the paper's conclusions were not justified. Please see the accompanying letter to the editor by Drs. Brigo and Trinka that first brought the flaws to our attention. The paper was independently reviewed by our statistician who concurred with their opinion. The editors extend their apologies to the readers of the journal that this error was not detected in the review process.<\/jats:p><jats:sec><jats:title>Reference<\/jats:title><jats:p>Misra UK, Dubey D, Kalita J. A randomized controlled trial of lacosamide versus sodium valproate in status epilepticus. Epilepsia. <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" xlink:href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/epi.13706\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/epi.13706<\/jats:ext-link><\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/epi.13706","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,2,18]],"date-time":"2017-02-18T09:16:48Z","timestamp":1487409408000},"page":"919-919","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["<i>Retracted<\/i>: A randomized controlled trial of lacosamide versus sodium valproate in status epilepticus"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"58","member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,2,18]]},"container-title":["Epilepsia"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fepi.13706","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/epi.13706","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,9]],"date-time":"2023-09-09T16:56:30Z","timestamp":1694278590000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/epi.13706"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,2,18]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/epi.13706"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/epi.13706","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0013-9580","1528-1167"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0013-9580","type":"print"},{"value":"1528-1167","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,2,18]]}}}