{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,6]],"date-time":"2026-10-06T20:15:45Z","timestamp":1791317745890,"version":"4.3.1"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,12,18]],"date-time":"2014-12-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1418860800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"funder":[{"name":"Zoetis Inc"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["beva.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Equine Veterinary Journal"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,11]]},"abstract":"Summary<\/jats:title>\n \n Reasons for performing study<\/jats:title>\n \n Traditionally, equine parasite control has relied heavily on frequent routine anthelmintic treatments applied at regular intervals all year round. However, current recommendations aim to employ a more surveillance\u2010based approach and it remains unknown to what extent these recommendations are being implemented on\n US<\/jats:styled-content>\n horse farms.\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Objectives<\/jats:title>\n \n To describe equine parasite control on\n K<\/jats:styled-content>\n entucky\n T<\/jats:styled-content>\n horoughbred farms and evaluate respondents' willingness to pay for various attributes of surveillance\u2010based parasite control strategies.\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Study design<\/jats:title>\n \n Questionnaire survey performed among the membership of the\n K<\/jats:styled-content>\n entucky\n T<\/jats:styled-content>\n horoughbred\n F<\/jats:styled-content>\n arm\n M<\/jats:styled-content>\n anagers'\n C<\/jats:styled-content>\n lub.\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Methods<\/jats:title>\n The survey collected demographic data and information about current parasite control strategies. Further, respondents were asked to choose between hypothetical parasite control strategies described with a combination of different attributes: costs, time and effort needed, hypothetical disease\u2010risk levels and hypothetical risks of anthelmintic resistance. Data were analysed with multivariable logistic analysis.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results<\/jats:title>\n About 26% responded to the survey (n = 112). Most respondents were concerned about anthelmintic resistance and incorporated veterinary advice in defining their deworming programme. However, almost 70% were following a traditional rotational deworming programme with little or no faecal surveillance. Respondents were willing to pay a premium for a product for which there is no known anthelmintic resistance and provided the highest possible decrease in health risks. The number of young horses on the farm, utilisation of veterinarian advice in developing a deworming programme, expressed concern about drug resistance in parasites and having documented drug resistance on the farm all associated significantly with the type of parasite control programme used.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n Traditional approaches for equine parasite control are still widely used in the Kentucky Thoroughbred industry. The data suggest that respondents were only willing to make these changes if they could be given assurance that the surveillance\u2010based approach would prevent anthelmintic resistance and decrease health risks significantly for the horses.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/evj.12344","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,5]],"date-time":"2014-09-05T05:06:45Z","timestamp":1409893605000},"page":"694-700","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":53,"title":["Attitudes towards implementation of surveillance\u2010based parasite control on\n K<\/scp>\n entucky\n T<\/scp>\n horoughbred farms \u2013 Current strategies, awareness and willingness\u2010to\u2010pay"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"47","author":[{"given":"M.","family":"Robert","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Agricultural Economics University of Kentucky Lexington USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"W.","family":"Hu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Agricultural Economics University of Kentucky Lexington USA"},{"name":"College of Economics and Management Huazhong Agricultural University China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M. K.","family":"Nielsen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"M.H. Gluck Equine Research Center Department of Veterinary Science University of Kentucky Lexington USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"C. J.","family":"Stowe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Agricultural Economics University of Kentucky Lexington USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,12,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_11_2_1","unstructured":"Anon(1998)Management and Health of Horses Part III. National Animal Health Monitoring System USDA: APHIS: VS. Fort Collins. pp.27\u201031."},{"key":"e_1_2_11_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/vr.150.13.405"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/vr.158.17.596"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0304-4017(02)00249-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.2042-3306.2011.00493.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_7_1","unstructured":"Nielsen M.K. Mittel L. Grice A. Erskine M. Graves E. Vaala W. Tully R.C. French D.D. Bowman R.andKaplan R.M.(2013)AAEP Parasite Control Guidelines. American Association of Equine Practitioners.http:\/\/www.aaep.org\/custdocs\/ParasiteControlGuidelinesFinal.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.vetpar.2014.01.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2746\/095777308X363912"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.2042-3292.2010.00084.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.vetpar.2013.10.016"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/vr.101804"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_13_1","unstructured":"Anon(2013)2012 Kentucky Equine Survey. University of Kentucky.http:\/\/equine.ca.uky.edu\/kyequinesurvey."},{"key":"e_1_2_11_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1086\/259131"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02404072"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_16_1","unstructured":"Kuhfeld W.F.(2010)Marketing Research Methods in SAS: experimental design choice conjoint and graphical techniques. SAS 9.2 edn MR\u20102010 SAS Institute Inc.https:\/\/support.sas.com\/techsup\/technote\/mr2010title.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_17_1","series-title":"Sawtooth Software Research Paper Series","volume-title":"Efficient Experimental Designs Using Computerized Searches","author":"Kuhfeld W.F.","year":"1997"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511753930"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_19_1","volume-title":"Thoroughbred Live Foal Report","author":"Anon","year":"2013"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_20_1","first-page":"345","article-title":"Examining motivations to refuse in industrial mail surveys","volume":"41","author":"Baldauf A.","year":"1999","journal-title":"J. Mark. Res. Soc."},{"key":"e_1_2_11_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2393298"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.vetpar.2011.10.010"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.vetpar.2011.10.012"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2460\/javma.2004.225.903"}],"container-title":["Equine Veterinary Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fevj.12344","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/beva.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/evj.12344","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,2]],"date-time":"2025-11-02T13:18:19Z","timestamp":1762089499000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/beva.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/evj.12344"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,12,18]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,11]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/evj.12344"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/evj.12344","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0425-1644","2042-3306"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0425-1644","type":"print"},{"value":"2042-3306","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,12,18]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2014-03-24","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2014-08-13","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2014-12-18","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}