{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,9]],"date-time":"2026-07-09T19:34:58Z","timestamp":1783625698284,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":10,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,9,13]],"date-time":"2013-09-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1379030400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,1]],"date-time":"2015-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1441065600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":718,"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/tdm_license_1.1"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Int J Lab Hematology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Summary<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title><jats:p>Despite the advancements in instrumentation within hematology laboratories, there is still a need for review of a peripheral blood film (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PBF<\/jats:styled-content>). For a thorough <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PBF<\/jats:styled-content> evaluation, it is critical that a well spread and stained film is available.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>In this study, we evaluated an automatic slide maker\/stainer (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">D<\/jats:styled-content>x<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">H<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SMS<\/jats:styled-content>,<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"> B<\/jats:styled-content>eckman <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">C<\/jats:styled-content>oulter) compared with manually prepared blood films on 124 normal and abnormal samples. The primary goal of the study was to determine whether or not the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">D<\/jats:styled-content>x<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">H<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SMS<\/jats:styled-content> was able to consistently and reproducibly prepare and stain blood films of exemplary quality, without carryover between specimens. Additionally, repeatability of white blood cell distribution, comparability of morphology to reference methodologies, and grading of acceptance criteria outlined in the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CLSI<\/jats:styled-content> document <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">H<\/jats:styled-content>20\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">A<\/jats:styled-content>2 were assessed.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>Carryover was not an issue and repeatability was within expected limits. There was excellent agreement of the 5\u2010part differential between the automated blood films made by the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">D<\/jats:styled-content>x<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">H<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SMS<\/jats:styled-content> compared with the manually prepared reference blood film. There was no difference in identification and enumeration of blasts, variant lymphocytes, or nucleated red blood cells (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u00a0&lt;\u00a00.05). Red cell morphology showed excellent agreement.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Blood films prepared by the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">D<\/jats:styled-content>x<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">H<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SMS<\/jats:styled-content> are of excellent quality, reproducible, and compare well with manually prepared slides. Introduction to our laboratory has improved and standardized slide quality.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/ijlh.12150","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,9,13]],"date-time":"2013-09-13T05:58:36Z","timestamp":1379051916000},"page":"172-183","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Initial performance evaluation of the UniCel<sup>\u00ae<\/sup> DxH slide maker\/stainer Coulter<sup>\u00ae<\/sup> cellular analysis system"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"36","author":[{"given":"W.","family":"Brown","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Special Hematology London Health Sciences Centre London ON Canada"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Keeney","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Special Hematology London Health Sciences Centre London ON Canada"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"B. D.","family":"Hedley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Special Hematology London Health Sciences Centre London ON Canada"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,9,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1532\/LH96.05019"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_1","unstructured":"The International Society for Laboratory Hematology.2013. Available from:www.islh.org\/web\/consensus_rules.php."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0272-2712(03)00064-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1532\/LH96.04022"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1751-553X.2007.00996.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/jcp.2005.035402"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_1","volume-title":"Reference Leukocyte (WBC) Differential Count (Proportional) and Evaluation of Instrumental Methods; Approved Standard","author":"Koepke JA","year":"2007"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_1","first-page":"13","article-title":"The use of relative operating characteristic (ROC) curves in test performance evaluation","volume":"110","author":"Beck JR","year":"1986","journal-title":"Arch Pathol Lab Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1751-553X.2009.01141.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470987551"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Laboratory Hematology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fijlh.12150","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/ijlh.12150","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,24]],"date-time":"2023-09-24T07:15:39Z","timestamp":1695539739000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/ijlh.12150"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,9,13]]},"references-count":10,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,4]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/ijlh.12150"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ijlh.12150","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1751-5521","1751-553X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1751-5521","type":"print"},{"value":"1751-553X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,9,13]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2013-09-13","name":"published_online","label":"Published Online","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}