{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]],"date-time":"2026-09-18T08:38:30Z","timestamp":1789720710114,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,26]],"date-time":"2015-07-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1437868800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int J of Urology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title><jats:p>To compare operative, pathological, and functional results of transperitoneal and extraperitoneal robot\u2010assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy carried out by a single surgeon.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>After having experience with 32 transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomies, 317 extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomies, 30 transperitoneal robot\u2010assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies and 10 extraperitoneal robot\u2010assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies, 120 patients with prostate cancer were enrolled in this prospective randomized study and underwent either transperitoneal or extraperitoneal robot\u2010assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The main outcome parameters between the two study groups were compared.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>No significant difference was found for age, body mass index, preoperative prostate\u2010specific antigen, clinical and pathological stage, Gleason score on biopsy and prostatectomy specimen, tumor volume, positive surgical margin, and lymph node status. Transperitoneal robot\u2010assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy had shorter trocar insertion time (16.0 <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic> 25.9\u00a0min for transperitoneal robot\u2010assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and extraperitoneal robot\u2010assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u00a0&lt;\u00a00.001), whereas extraperitoneal robot\u2010assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy had shorter console time (101.5 <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic> 118.3\u00a0min, respectively, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u00a0&lt;\u00a00.001). Total operation time and total anesthesia time were found to be shorter in extraperitoneal robot\u2010assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, without statistical significance (200.9 <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic> 193.2\u00a0min; 221.8 <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic> 213.3\u00a0min, respectively). Estimated blood loss was found to be lower for extraperitoneal robot\u2010assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u00a0=\u00a00.001). Catheterization and hospitalization times were observed to be shorter in extraperitoneal robot\u2010assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (7.3 <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic> 5.8\u00a0days and 3.1 <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic> 2.3\u00a0days for transperitoneal robot\u2010assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and extraperitoneal robot\u2010assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, respectively, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u00a0&lt;\u00a00.05). The time to oral diet was significantly shorter in extraperitoneal robot\u2010assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (32.3 <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic> 20.1\u00a0h, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u00a0=\u00a00.031). Functional outcomes (continence and erection) and complication rates were similar in both groups.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title><jats:p>Extraperitoneal robot\u2010assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy seems to be a good alternative to transperitoneal robot\u2010assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with similar operative, pathological and functional results. As the surgical field remains away from the bowel, postoperative return to normal diet and early discharge can be favored.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/iju.12854","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,27]],"date-time":"2015-07-27T01:20:55Z","timestamp":1437960055000},"page":"916-921","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":43,"title":["Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot\u2010assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective single surgeon randomized comparative study"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"22","author":[{"given":"Murat","family":"Akand","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology School of Medicine Selcuk University Konya Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tibet","family":"Erdogru","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Departments of Urology and Minimally Invasive &amp; Robotic Surgery Memorial Atasehir Hospital Istanbul Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Egemen","family":"Avci","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Departments of Urology and Minimally Invasive &amp; Robotic Surgery Memorial Atasehir Hospital Istanbul Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mutlu","family":"Ates","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology Memorial Antalya Hospital Antalya Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,26]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_8_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/ncpuro0040"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1464-410x.2001.00115.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-007-0012-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.280.11.969"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)67511-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2006.07.008"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2010.0222"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2007.9872"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00365599.2011.637957"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2007.9906"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2011.0052"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ju.0000076015.88739.a2"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2004.05.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1553350611429028"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)00340-X"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2009.09013.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_19_1","first-page":"649","article-title":"A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience","volume":"66","author":"Rozet F","year":"2007","journal-title":"J. Urol."},{"key":"e_1_2_8_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2010.10.012"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_21_1","first-page":"919","article-title":"Meta\u2010analysis of transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot\u2010assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer","volume":"23","author":"Lee JY","year":"2013","journal-title":"JLAST."}],"container-title":["International Journal of Urology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fiju.12854","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/iju.12854","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,3]],"date-time":"2023-10-03T07:56:32Z","timestamp":1696319792000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/iju.12854"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,26]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,10]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/iju.12854"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/iju.12854","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0919-8172","1442-2042"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0919-8172","type":"print"},{"value":"1442-2042","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,26]]}}}