{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,1]],"date-time":"2026-10-01T20:25:27Z","timestamp":1790886327008,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,12,23]],"date-time":"2015-12-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1450828800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["International Wound Journal"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    Advanced therapies such as bioengineered skin substitutes (\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BSS<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    ) and dehydrated human amnion\/chorion membrane (\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">dHACM<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    ) have been shown to promote healing of chronic diabetic ulcers. An interim analysis of data from 60 patients enrolled in a prospective, randomised, controlled, parallel group, multi\u2010centre clinical trial showed that\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">dHACM<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    (\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">EpiFix<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    \u00ae,\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">MiMedx<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    Group Inc., Marietta,\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">GA<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    ) is superior to standard wound care (\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SWC<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    ) and\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BSS<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    (Apligraf\u00ae, Organogenesis, Inc., Canton,\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">MA<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    ) in achieving complete wound closure within 4\u20136 weeks. Rates and time to closure at a longer time interval and factors influencing outcomes remained unassessed; therefore, the study was continued in order to achieve at least 100 patients. With the larger cohort, we compare clinical outcomes at 12 weeks in 100 patients with chronic lower extremity diabetic ulcers treated with weekly applications of Apligraf (\n                    <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                    = 33),\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">EpiFix<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    (\n                    <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                    = 32) or\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SWC<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    (\n                    <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                    = 35) with collagen\u2010alginate dressing as controls. A Cox regression was performed to analyse the time to heal within 12 weeks, adjusting for all significant covariates. A Kaplan\u2013Meier analysis was conducted to compare time\u2010to\u2010heal within 12 weeks for the three treatment groups. Clinical characteristics were well matched across study groups. The proportion of wounds achieving complete closure within the 12\u2010week study period were 73% (24\/33), 97% (31\/32), and 51% (18\/35) for Apligraf,\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">EpiFix<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    and\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SWC<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    , respectively (adjusted\n                    <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                    = 0\u00b700019). Subjects treated with\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">EpiFix<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    had a very significant higher probability of their wounds healing [hazard ratio (\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">HR<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    : 5\u00b766; adjusted\n                    <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                    : 1\u00b73 x 10\n                    <jats:sup>\u22127<\/jats:sup>\n                    ] compared to\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SWC<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    alone. No difference in probability of healing was observed for the Apligraf and\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SWC<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    groups. Patients treated with Apligraf were less likely to heal than those treated with\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">EpiFix<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    [\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">HR<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    : 0\u00b730; 95% confidence interval\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">(CI)<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    : 0\u00b717\u20130\u00b754; unadjusted\n                    <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                    : 5\u00b78 x 10\n                    <jats:sup>\u22125<\/jats:sup>\n                    ]. Increased wound size and presence of hypertension were significant factors that influenced healing. Mean time\u2010to\u2010heal within 12 weeks was 47\u00b79 days (95%\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    : 38\u00b72\u201357\u00b77) with Apligraf, 23\u00b76 days (95%\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    : 17\u00b70\u201330\u00b72) with\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">EpiFix<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    group and 57\u00b74 days (95%\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    : 48\u00b72\u201366\u00b76) with the\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SWC<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    alone group (adjusted\n                    <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                    = 3\u00b72 x 10\n                    <jats:sup>\u22127<\/jats:sup>\n                    ). Median number of grafts used per healed wound were six (range 1\u201313) and 2\u00b75 (range 1\u201312) for the Apligraf and\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">EpiFix<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    groups, respectively. Median graft cost was $8918 (range $1,486\u201319,323) per healed wound for the Apligraf group and $1,517 (range $434\u201325,710) per healed wound in the  EpiFix group (\n                    <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009&lt;\u20090\u00b70001). These results provide further evidence of the clinical and resource utilisation superiority of\n                    <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">EpiFix<\/jats:styled-content>\n                    compared to Apligraf for the treatment of lower extremity diabetic wounds.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1111\/iwj.12566","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,12,23]],"date-time":"2015-12-23T03:38:42Z","timestamp":1450841922000},"page":"272-282","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":167,"title":["Treatment of chronic diabetic lower extremity ulcers with advanced therapies: a prospective, randomised, controlled, multi\u2010centre comparative study examining clinical efficacy and cost"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"13","author":[{"given":"Charles M","family":"Zelen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Professional Education and Research Institute  Roanoke VA USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Thomas E","family":"Serena","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Serena Group  Cambridge MA USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5167-4679","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lisa","family":"Gould","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Plastic Surgery, Wound Recovery Center Kent Hospital  Warwick RI USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lam","family":"Le","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"St. John Wound Care  Tulsa OK USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marissa J","family":"Carter","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Strategic Solutions, Inc.  Cody WY USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jennifer","family":"Keller","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Shenandoah Lower Extremity Research  Troutville VA USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"William W","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"The Angiogenesis Foundation  Boston MA USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,12,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_5_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2337\/dc13-0270"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2337\/dc08-9021"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1742-4801.2005.00085.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2337\/dc12-2625"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_6_1","first-page":"197","article-title":"Wound percent area reduction and making decisions about utilizing advanced therapies","volume":"29","author":"Snyder R","year":"2010","journal-title":"Podiatry Manage"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1524-475X.2006.00176.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0891-8422(02)00018-6"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ASW.0000288217.83128.f3"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.324.7330.160"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(03)13169-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_12_1","first-page":"55","volume-title":"Implementing comparative effectiveness research: priorities, methods and impact","author":"Pearson S","year":"2009"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_13_1","unstructured":"HoC TranK HuxM SibbaldG CampbellK. Artificial skin grafts in chronic wound care: a meta\u2010analysis of clinical efficacy and a review of cost\u2010effectiveness [Technology report no 52]. Ottawa: Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment 2005."},{"key":"e_1_2_5_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2337\/diacare.24.2.290"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/iwj.12097"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_16_1","first-page":"31","article-title":"An evaluation of healing metrics associated with commonly used advanced wound care products for the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers","volume":"23","author":"Fetterolf DE","year":"2014","journal-title":"Manag Care"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/iwj.12395"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.12968\/jowc.2013.22.9.470"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_19_1","unstructured":"Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare Part B Drug Average Sales Price July2014 ASP Drug Pricing Files 09\/03\/14. URLhttps:\/\/www.cms.gov\/apps\/ama\/license.asp?file=\/McrPartBDrugAvgSalesPrice\/downloads\/Jul\u20102014\u2010ASP\u2010Pricing\u2010File.zip[accessed on 9 October 2015]."},{"key":"e_1_2_5_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2010.03.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.12968\/jowc.2013.22.7.347"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/iwj.12242"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/wrr.12332"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"AnglemyerA HorvathHT BeroL. Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials (Review). The Cochrane Library 2014 Issue 4. URLhttp:\/\/www.thecochranelibrary.com[accessed on 10 November 2015]","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.MR000034.pub2"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7547\/8750-7315-104.6.555"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/wrr.12341"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_27_1","first-page":"e19","article-title":"Evidence\u2010based management strategies for treatment of chronic wounds","volume":"9","author":"Werdin F","year":"2009","journal-title":"Eplasty"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ASW.0000450831.65667.89"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/009885881303900401"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/ije\/dyh299"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6963-9-115"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1345\/aph.1R417"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_33_1","first-page":"30","article-title":"Use of a dehydrated amniotic membrane allograft on lower extremity ulcers in patients with challenging wounds: a retrospective case series","volume":"61","author":"Lintzeris D","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ostomy Wound Manage"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/iwj.12458"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_35_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/iwj.12140"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jbm.b.33141"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/2045-824X-6-10"}],"container-title":["International Wound Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fiwj.12566","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/iwj.12566","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1111\/iwj.12566","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/iwj.12566","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,2]],"date-time":"2023-10-02T13:49:21Z","timestamp":1696254561000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/iwj.12566"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,12,23]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,4]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/iwj.12566"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/iwj.12566","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1742-4801","1742-481X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1742-4801","type":"print"},{"value":"1742-481X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,12,23]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2015-11-11","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2015-11-25","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2015-12-23","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}