{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,31]],"date-time":"2025-12-31T06:32:40Z","timestamp":1767162760669,"version":"build-2238731810"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,26]],"date-time":"2024-03-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1711411200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["International Wound Journal"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    This research is intended to explore the influence of second and first degree closure methods on the degree of wound pain and swelling of the face following the removal of the mandible. For the purpose of this study, three data sets, including PubMed and Embase, were selected. A separate statistical analysis was conducted on the choice of the trial, the collection of data and the risk of bias. Differences between trials were analysed with a chi\u2010square approach, with data analyses dependent on\n                    <jats:italic>I<\/jats:italic>\n                    <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                    . A sensitivity analysis was conducted, and a possible publication bias was evaluated. Ultimately, nine qualifying trials were chosen out of an original pool of 1922 related trials following an in\u2010depth evaluation under the eligibility and exclusion criteria, as well as a follow\u2010up screening. The results indicated that there was no statistically significant change in the degree of post\u2010operation pain after 1\u2009day operation between one or secondary closures of treatment (MD, \u22120.46; 95% CI, \u22120.93, 0.01,\n                    <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009=\u20090.06); the results showed that there were no statistically significant differences in post\u2010operation wound pain after 3\u2009days in two group (MD, \u22120.15; 95% CI, \u22120.68, 0.37,\n                    <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009=\u20090.56); the results showed that there were no statistically different effects on the post\u2010operation wound pain after the 7th day in two groups (MD, \u22120.14; 95% CI, \u22120.31, 0.03,\n                    <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009=\u20090.1). The results showed that there were no statistically different effects on the post\u2010operation wound pain after the 1\u2009day in two groups (MD, \u22120.26; 95% CI, \u22120.38, \u22120.13,\n                    <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009&lt;\u20090.0001); on the 3rd day after surgery, the face was significantly smaller swelling in the secondary closure of closure compared with the first\u2010stage closure group (MD, \u22120.70; 95% CI, \u22121.40, \u22120.00,\n                    <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009=\u20090.05). While there is no obvious effect on post\u2010operation wound pain in patients with mandibular surgery, there is significant difference in post\u2010operation face swelling. The findings do not support a preference for any of these methods.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1111\/iwj.14753","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,26]],"date-time":"2024-03-26T19:38:46Z","timestamp":1711481926000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["RETRACTED: The effect of primary closure versus secondary closure techniques on postoperative wound pain in patients undergoing mandibular surgery: A meta\u2010analysis"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"21","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0009-9033-1818","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lina","family":"Zhang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Stomatology No. 215 Hospital of Shaanxi Provincial Nuclear Industry  Xianyang China"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lei","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Oral &amp; Maxillofacial Surgery No. 215 Hospital of Shaanxi Provincial Nuclear Industry  Xianyang China"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,26]]},"reference":[{"issue":"10","key":"e_1_2_9_2_1","first-page":"1031","article-title":"Permanent dentition in Delhi boys of age 5\u201314\u2009years","volume":"41","author":"Agarwal KN","year":"2004","journal-title":"Indian Pediatr"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0278-2391(82)90111-2"},{"issue":"5","key":"e_1_2_9_4_1","first-page":"448","article-title":"Analgesic efficacy of diclofenac sodium versus ibuprofen following surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars","volume":"9","author":"Esteller\u2010Martinez V","year":"2004","journal-title":"Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal"},{"issue":"2","key":"e_1_2_9_5_1","first-page":"E138","article-title":"Flap repositioning versus conventional suturing in third molar surgery","volume":"13","author":"Sanchis Bielsa JM","year":"2008","journal-title":"Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4317\/medoral.20307"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjoms.2011.04.075"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/moe.2002.119519"},{"issue":"9","key":"e_1_2_9_9_1","first-page":"689","article-title":"Long\u2010term comparison of two surgical flap designs for third molar surgery on the health of the periodontal tissue of the second molar tooth","volume":"54","author":"Schofield ID","year":"1988","journal-title":"J Can Dent Assoc"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0278-2391(03)00675-X"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joms.2005.12.014"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joms.2012.03.017"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joms.2011.01.025"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijom.2012.02.011"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joms.2009.04.060"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijom.2004.01.023"},{"issue":"5","key":"e_1_2_9_17_1","first-page":"360","article-title":"Relation of patient and surgical variables to postoperative pain and inflammation in the extraction of third molars","volume":"7","author":"Olmedo\u2010Gaya MV","year":"2002","journal-title":"Med Oral"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1746-160X-7-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/moe.2002.122823"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joms.2018.12.001"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4103\/0975-5950.102141"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4103\/jwas.jwas_191_22"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12903-017-0416-z"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joms.2010.05.009"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijom.2012.04.009"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10006-018-0696-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12903-022-02287-y"}],"updated-by":[{"DOI":"10.1111\/iwj.70402","type":"retraction","label":"Retraction","source":"retraction-watch","updated":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,21]],"date-time":"2025-03-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1742515200000},"record-id":"65480"},{"DOI":"10.1111\/iwj.70402","type":"retraction","label":"Retraction","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,21]],"date-time":"2025-03-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1742515200000}}],"container-title":["International Wound Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/iwj.14753","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,4]],"date-time":"2025-08-04T06:29:27Z","timestamp":1754288967000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/iwj.14753"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,26]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,4]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/iwj.14753"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/iwj.14753","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1742-4801","1742-481X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1742-4801","type":"print"},{"value":"1742-481X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,26]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2024-01-15","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2024-01-23","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2024-03-26","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}],"article-number":"e14753"}}