{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,5]],"date-time":"2026-10-05T12:38:39Z","timestamp":1791203919180,"version":"4.2.0"},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"5-6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,2,15]],"date-time":"2011-02-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1297728000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Journal of Clinical Nursing"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>\n                    <jats:bold>Aims and objectives.\u2002<\/jats:bold>\n                    To compare the accuracy and appropriateness of auscultatory (manual) and oscillometric (automated) devices for measuring blood pressure in clinical settings.\n                  <\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    <jats:bold>Background.\u2002<\/jats:bold>\n                    Accurate measurement of blood pressure is integral to early recognition of deterioration in the condition of a patient. Despite recommendations regarding the use of auscultatory devices in situations where treatment decisions are made dependent on blood readings, the use of automated machines is becoming common practice.\n                  <\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    <jats:bold>Design.\u2002<\/jats:bold>\n                    Systematic review.\n                  <\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    <jats:bold>Methods.\u2002<\/jats:bold>\n                    A search of the Medline, CINAHLPlus and The Cochrane Library databases was undertaken for papers published in English between January 1997\u2013May 2009. Sixteen studies were identified that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. After quality assessment, all were included in the review. Results are presented in tabular and narrative form.\n                  <\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    <jats:bold>Results.\u2002<\/jats:bold>\n                    In 10 of the studies reviewed, the authors came to the conclusion that oscillometric devices were less accurate than auscultatory devices. However, in most cases the oscillometric device appears sufficiently accurate for clinical use, the exceptions being use with hypertensive patients, patients with arrhythmia and after trauma. Only two studies assessed the comparative accuracy of aneroid devices, and these indicated that they were more accurate than oscillometric devices, but the differences were not clinically important.\n                  <\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    <jats:bold>Conclusions.\u2002<\/jats:bold>\n                    There are situations where the substitution of oscillometric for auscultatory devices could have particularly serious repercussions for the patient, such as when the patient is either hypertensive or hypotensive. However, further research is required on the use of aneroid sphygmomanometers as a replacement for mercury devices.\n                  <\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    <jats:bold>Relevance to clinical practice.\u2002<\/jats:bold>\n                    Practitioners should be made aware of the need to use auscultatory devices in specific circumstances, such as in management of hypertension, after the patient has experienced trauma or where there is significant potential for deterioration in the patient\u2019s condition.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2702.2010.03528.x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,2,15]],"date-time":"2011-02-15T07:26:28Z","timestamp":1297754788000},"page":"602-614","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":71,"title":["A systematic review of variability and reliability of manual and automated blood pressure readings"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"20","author":[{"given":"Heather","family":"Skirton","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wendy","family":"Chamberlain","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Caroline","family":"Lawson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Helen","family":"Ryan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Emma","family":"Young","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,2,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_11_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.322.7292.981"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.mbp.0000173486.44648.b2"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1440-1762.1999.00308.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1553-2712.2004.tb02203.x"},{"issue":"3","key":"e_1_2_11_6_1","first-page":"s29","article-title":"Value of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in clinical pharmacology","volume":"7","author":"Conway C","year":"1989","journal-title":"Journal of Hypertension"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00126097-200402000-00007"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.TA.0000092686.91877.DE"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/MBP.0b013e3280858b73"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_10_1","unstructured":"Department of Health(2000)Comprehensive Critical Care \u2013 A Review of Adult Critical Care Services. Available at:http:\/\/www.dh.gov.uk\/en\/Publicationsandstatistics\/Publications\/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance\/DH_4006585(accessed 5 March 2010)."},{"key":"e_1_2_11_11_1","first-page":"339","article-title":"Accuracy and \u2018range of uncertainty\u2019 of oscillometric blood pressure monitors around the upper arm and the wrist","volume":"3","author":"Dieterle T","year":"1998","journal-title":"Blood Pressure Monitoring"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470693926"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/MBP.0b013e3280858dcf"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.mbp.0000200480.26669.72"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2345\/0899-8205-43.2.158"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.325.7376.1360"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_17_1","unstructured":"HigginsJPT&GreenS(editors) (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration 2008. Available fromhttp:\/\/www.cochrane\u2010handbook.org(accessed 5 March 2010)."},{"key":"e_1_2_11_18_1","first-page":"1249","article-title":"Electronic readings of blood pressure seem to be higher than readings obtained with mercury sphygmomanometers","volume":"322","author":"Ireland J","year":"2001","journal-title":"British Medical Journal"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_19_1","unstructured":"KmetLM LeeRC&CookLS(2004)Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields. Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. Available at:http:\/\/www.ihe.ca\/documents\/HTA\u2010FR13.pdf(accessed 5 March 2010)."},{"key":"e_1_2_11_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00126097-200512000-00009"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_21_1","first-page":"1512","article-title":"Evaluation of a community based automated BP measuring device","volume":"166","author":"Lewis J","year":"2002","journal-title":"Canadian Medical Association Journal"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/ajh.2008.338"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7748\/ns2006.11.21.11.42.c6383"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_24_1","unstructured":"Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency(2003)Minutes of the Meeting of the Committee On Blood Pressure Monitoring In Clinical Practice Tuesday 4 November 2003. Available at:http:\/\/www.mhra.gov.uk\/Committees\/Devices\/CommitteeonBloodPressureMonitoringinClinicalPractice\/index.htm(accessed 5 March 2010)."},{"key":"e_1_2_11_25_1","unstructured":"Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency(2005)Report of the Independent Advisory Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring in Clinical Practice. Available at:http:\/\/www.mhra.gov.uk\/home\/groups\/dts\u2010iac\/documents\/committeedocument\/con2022714.pdf(accessed 5 March 2010)."},{"key":"e_1_2_11_26_1","volume-title":"Device Bulletin: Blood Pressure Measuring Devices","author":"Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency","year":"2006"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.322.7296.1248"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/ajh.2007.54"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_29_1","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence(NICE) (2006)Hypertension: Management of Hypertension in Adults in Primary Care. Available at:http:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/nicemedia\/pdf\/CG034NICEguideline.pdf(accessed 5 March 2010)."},{"key":"e_1_2_11_30_1","unstructured":"National Patient Safety Agency(2007)Safer Care for the Acutely Ill Patient: Learning from Serious Incidents. 5th Report from the Patient Safety Observatory. Available at:http:\/\/npsa.nhs.uk\/nrls\/alerts\u2010and\u2010directives\/directives\u2010guidance\/acutely\u2010ill\u2010patient\/(accessed 5 March 2010)."},{"key":"e_1_2_11_31_1","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2007)Acutely Ill Patients in Hospital: Recognition and Response to Acute Illness in Adults in Hospital. Available at:http:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/nicemedia\/pdf\/CG50FullGuidance.pdf(accessed 5 March 2010)."},{"issue":"2","key":"e_1_2_11_32_1","first-page":"S43","article-title":"The British Hypertension Society Protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices","volume":"11","author":"O\u2019Brien E","year":"1993","journal-title":"Journal of Hypertension"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.322.7285.531"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.322.7294.1110"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_35_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.mbp.0000217998.96967.fb"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/MBP.0b013e3280b08317"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archinte.158.7.714"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1161\/01.HYP.26.6.912"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_39_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.12968\/bjon.2005.14.3.17519"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_40_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00126097-200212000-00003"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_41_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/qjmed\/95.9.571"}],"container-title":["Journal of Clinical Nursing"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2702.2010.03528.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/j.1365-2702.2010.03528.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,31]],"date-time":"2023-08-31T07:35:02Z","timestamp":1693467302000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/j.1365-2702.2010.03528.x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,2,15]]},"references-count":40,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5-6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/j.1365-2702.2010.03528.x"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1365-2702.2010.03528.x","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0962-1067","1365-2702"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0962-1067","type":"print"},{"value":"1365-2702","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,2,15]]}}}