{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,29]],"date-time":"2025-10-29T13:06:46Z","timestamp":1761743206120},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2009,2,27]],"date-time":"2009-02-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1235692800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Health Expectations"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p><jats:bold>Objective\u2002<\/jats:bold> To explore information needs and preferences on diagnostic bowel tests and elicit preferences for CT colonography (CTC) vs. colonoscopy (CC).<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Background\u2002<\/jats:bold> CTC is a new technology for large\u2010bowel imaging that has been widely assumed to be more acceptable than CC because it is non\u2010invasive.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Design\u2002<\/jats:bold> Semi\u2010structured focus groups discussing information choices and procedure preferences.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Setting and participants\u2002<\/jats:bold> Non\u2010patient sample of 26 asymptomatic volunteers (mean age 64\u2003years).<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Main outcome measures\u2002<\/jats:bold> Information choices and CC\u2010vs.\u2010CTC preferences were recorded following stepwise presentation of different test attributes. Qualitative thematic analysis was used to examine transcripts of group discussions.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Results\u2002<\/jats:bold> On the basis of minimal information about the two tests, a majority of participants preferred CTC to CC (65% vs. 11%), while 24% had no preference. However, once they had received information on all aspects, this was reversed, with 80% of participants preferring CC compared with 8% preferring CTC. Thematic analysis of the discussion showed that participants almost unanimously considered information about test sensitivity to be the most important feature, and perceived relatively modest differences in test sensitivity to be highly significant. Information about risks and side\u2010effects was considered to be the second most important aspect and attracted questions about risks of bowel perforation and health consequences following exposure to radiation.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Conclusions\u2002<\/jats:bold> Patients place high value on quality rather than comfort for medical investigations. This has important implications for the development of educational materials supporting informed choice as well as future directions in refinement of CTC technology.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1369-7625.2008.00520.x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2009,2,27]],"date-time":"2009-02-27T09:21:00Z","timestamp":1235726460000},"page":"18-26","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":43,"title":["Choosing between CT colonography and colonoscopy in the diagnostic context: a qualitative study of influences on patient preferences"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"12","author":[{"given":"Christian","family":"Von Wagner","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Steve","family":"Halligan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Wendy S.","family":"Atkin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Richard J.","family":"Lilford","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Dion","family":"Morton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jane","family":"Wardle","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2009,2,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.22668"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.181.4.1810913"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0009-9260(02)00508-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1572-0241.2003.07302.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1586\/14737140.4.4.615"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.319.7219.1249"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa031618"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr\/61732956"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr\/58438178"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.5498"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crad.2003.09.008"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_2","first-page":"393","article-title":"Patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening: how does stool DNA testing fare?","volume":"13","author":"Schroy PC","year":"2007","journal-title":"American Journal of Managed Care"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1525-1497.2001.10337.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1525-1497.1999.00018.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1524-4733.2007.00196.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_17_2","first-page":"A75","article-title":"A review of studies examining stated preferences for cancer screening","volume":"3","author":"Phillips KA","year":"2006","journal-title":"Preventing Chronic Disease"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-126-6-199703150-00011"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_19_2","volume-title":"Seeking Patients\u2019 Consent: The Ethical Considerations","author":"General Medical Council","year":"1998"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1369-7625.2003.00227.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_21_2","first-page":"390","article-title":"Patient preferences for colon cancer screening: the role of out\u2010of\u2010pocket costs","volume":"13","author":"Pignone M","year":"2007","journal-title":"American Journal of Managed Care"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1369-6513.2002.00194.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_23_2","unstructured":"National Cancer Institute.Colonoscopy. Available at: URL:http:\/\/www.cancer.gov\/images\/cdr\/live\/CDR415504 accessed on 26 February 2007."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_24_2","first-page":"219","volume-title":"Qualitative Research Practice","author":"Richie J","year":"2003"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s003300101082"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.291.14.1713"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(05)17784-8"}],"container-title":["Health Expectations"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fj.1369-7625.2008.00520.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/j.1369-7625.2008.00520.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,10]],"date-time":"2023-10-10T18:23:45Z","timestamp":1696962225000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/j.1369-7625.2008.00520.x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2009,2,27]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/j.1369-7625.2008.00520.x"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1369-7625.2008.00520.x","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1369-6513","1369-7625"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1369-6513","type":"print"},{"value":"1369-7625","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2009,2,27]]}}}