{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,31]],"date-time":"2026-07-31T19:17:51Z","timestamp":1785525471421,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":43,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2007,7,16]],"date-time":"2007-07-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1184544000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Acta Anaesthesiol Scand"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:p><jats:bold>Background:\u2002<\/jats:bold> Propofol\u2013rocuronium is thought to be superior to thiopental\u2013rocuronium for rapid sequence intubation (RSI). The role of the intubation model per se has never been investigated.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Methods:\u2002<\/jats:bold> Randomized comparisons of rocuronium with succinylcholine for true RSI (administration of muscle relaxant immediately after the hypnotic, intubation within 60 s) or modified RSI (delay between administration of the hypnotic and the muscle relaxant, intubation within 60 s) were sought. Good or excellent intubation conditions were expressed as relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Results:\u2002<\/jats:bold> Twelve trials (1471 patients) used a true RSI. With propofol for induction, RR for good or excellent intubation conditions with conventional rocuronium doses (0.6\u20130.7 mg\/kg) was 0.95 (95%CI, 0.90\u20131.00), with high doses (0.9\u20131.2 mg\/kg) was 0.96 (0.92\u20131.01) compared with succinylcholine. With thiopental for induction, RR with conventional rocuronium doses was 0.69 (0.61\u20130.78) and with high doses was 0.99 (0.95\u20131.03). Nine trials (340 patients) used a modified RSI. With propofol for induction, RR with conventional rocuronium doses was 0.98 (0.91\u20131.06); data on high rocuronium doses were lacking. With thiopental for induction, RR with conventional rocuronium doses was 0.97 (0.92\u20131.02) and with high doses was 1.0. There was no evidence that concomitantly used opioids or the dose of the induction agent had an impact on intubation conditions, independent of the intubation model.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Conclusion:\u2002<\/jats:bold> The efficacy of rocuronium for RSI is influenced by both, the induction agent and the intubation model. To test the clinical usefulness of alternatives to succinylcholine for RSI, a true RSI model should be used.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-6576.2007.01367.x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,7,16]],"date-time":"2007-07-16T11:21:21Z","timestamp":1184584881000},"page":"848-857","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":27,"title":["Impact of the intubation model on the efficacy of rocuronium during rapid sequence intubation: systematic review of randomized trials"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"51","author":[{"given":"C.","family":"Lysakowski","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"L.","family":"Suppan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"C.","family":"Czarnetzki","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"E.","family":"Tassonyi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M. R.","family":"Tram\u00e8r","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2007,7,16]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_5_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1197\/aemj.9.8.813"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/69.3.269"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0952-8180(96)00108-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-6576.1996.tb04389.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0952-8180(97)00065-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_7_2","first-page":"133","article-title":"Safety aspects of non\u2010depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents with special reference to rocuronium bromide","volume":"9","author":"Mirakhur RK","year":"1994","journal-title":"Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0952-8180(96)00078-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1399-6576.1999.430102.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_10_2","first-page":"285","article-title":"Comparison of intubating conditions after rocuronium and succinylcholine following \u2018rapid sequence induction\u2019 with RSI 12 thiopentone in emergency surgeries","volume":"15","author":"Bhardwaj N","year":"1999","journal-title":"J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/82.5.757"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0265021505001249"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2044.1998.00342.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S026502150500044X"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1213\/01.ANE.0000180196.58567.FE"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/77.3.339"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-6576.1996.tb04464.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1213\/01.ane.0000194509.03916.02"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0952-8180(00)00191-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-995961"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-199311000-00007"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1213\/00000539-199207000-00007"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_23_2","first-page":"193","article-title":"Is rocuronium an alternative to succinycholine","volume":"27","author":"Turan G","year":"1999","journal-title":"T\u00fcrk Anesth Rean Cem Mecmuast"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0952-8180(99)00013-6"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1399-6576.2003.00086.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_26_2","first-page":"122","article-title":"Analysis of the effects of rocuronium, mivacurium and succinicholine for endotracheal intubaction","volume":"20","author":"Alvarez Rios JJ","year":"1997","journal-title":"Rev Mex Anest"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0952-8180(92)90221-L"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_28_2","first-page":"141","article-title":"The best priming dose and priming interval for mivacurium 0.15 mg\/kg\u20101","volume":"49","author":"Giudice G","year":"1998","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Ital"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00000539-199911000-00044"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03010932"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0750-7658(94)80179-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0952-8180(97)00010-X"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_33_2","first-page":"44","article-title":"Rapid\u2010sequence orotracheal intubation with rocuronium: a randomized double\u2010blind comparison with suxamethonium \u2013 preliminary communication","volume":"9","author":"Tryba M","year":"1994","journal-title":"Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_34_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0952-8180(96)85617-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_35_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/79.4.450"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_36_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1460-9592.1998.00719.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_37_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00000539-199812000-00009"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_38_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aei314"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_39_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-200604000-00009"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_40_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.1988.tb04146.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_41_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00000539-199706000-00009"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_42_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03016058"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_43_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-6576.1991.tb03298.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_44_2","volume-title":"Anesthesia","author":"Miller RD","year":"2005"}],"container-title":["Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fj.1399-6576.2007.01367.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/j.1399-6576.2007.01367.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,9]],"date-time":"2023-10-09T16:47:09Z","timestamp":1696870029000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/j.1399-6576.2007.01367.x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2007,7,16]]},"references-count":43,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/j.1399-6576.2007.01367.x"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1399-6576.2007.01367.x","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0001-5172","1399-6576"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0001-5172","type":"print"},{"value":"1399-6576","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2007,7,16]]}}}