{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T00:56:30Z","timestamp":1787014590876,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,7,26]],"date-time":"2012-07-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1343260800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Acta Anaesthesiol Scand"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A synergy between ketamine and methadone (\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ME<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      ) to produce antinociception has been demonstrated in experimental neuropathy. We wanted to compare post\u2010operative opioid requirements in patients undergoing multilevel lumbar arthrodesis after the administration combined\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ME<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      \u2013ketamine (\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">MK<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      ) or\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ME<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      alone.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      This was a randomised double\u2010blind study. During sevoflurane\u2013remifentanil anaesthesia, 11 patients in each group received the following: ketamine bolus (0.5\u2009mg\/kg) after tracheal intubation, followed by an infusion of 2.5\u2009\u03bcg\/kg\/min in the\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">MK<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      or saline bolus plus infusion in the\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ME<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      group. Post\u2010operative analgesia \u2013 during 48\u2009h \u2013 was provided by patient\u2010controlled analgesia (\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCA<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      ), delivering bolus containing the following:\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ME<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      0.25\u2009mg plus ketamine 0.5\u2009mg in the\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">MK<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      group or\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ME<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      0.5\u2009mg in the\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ME<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      group. Lockout was 10\u2009min, maximum of 3 boluses\/h in both groups. Before closing the wound, all the patients received intravenous (i.v.)\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ME<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      0.1\u2009mg\/kg, dexketoprophen and paracetamol. Pain intensity was evaluated by a numerical rating scale (\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">NRS<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      ), on arrival at recovery room (\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">RR<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      ) and 24 and 48\u2009h after surgery. In the\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">RR<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      , i.v.\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ME<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      was administered until\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">NRS<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      was 3 when\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCA<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      was started. Dexketoprophen and paracetamol were administered 48\u2009h.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Remifentanil requirements were higher in the\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">MK<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      group (\n                      <jats:italic>\n                        <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">P<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      <\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.004). Patients in the\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">MK<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      group received 70% less\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ME<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      by\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCA<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      at 24\u2009h (\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">MK<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      vs.\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ME<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      group, median and interquartile range) \u2013 3.43\u2009mg (1.9\u20136.5) vs. 15\u2009mg (9.65\u201317.38) (\n                      <jats:italic>\n                        <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">P<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      <\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt;\u20090.001) \u2013 and at 48\u2009h \u2013 2\u2009mg (0.5\u20133.63) vs. 9.5\u2009mg (3.5\u201313.75) (\n                      <jats:italic>\n                        <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">P<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      <\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.001). Patients in the\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">MK<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      group also attempted less doses, at 24\u2009h: 19.5 (12.75\u201379.5) vs. 98 (41.5\u2013137) (\n                      <jats:italic>\n                        <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">P<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      <\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.043). Both groups had similar\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">NRS<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      values and comparable side effects.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Perioperative ketamine\u2013\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ME<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      combination significantly decreased opioid consumption by\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCA<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      .\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-6576.2012.02743.x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,7,27]],"date-time":"2012-07-27T00:25:02Z","timestamp":1343348702000},"page":"1250-1256","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":48,"title":["The perioperative combination of methadone and ketamine reduces post\u2010operative opioid usage compared with methadone alone"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"56","author":[{"given":"S.","family":"PACREU","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesiology, Parc de Salut Mar Universitat Aut\u00f3noma de Barcelona  Barcelona Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"J.","family":"FERN\u00c1NDEZ CANDIL","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesiology, Parc de Salut Mar Universitat Aut\u00f3noma de Barcelona  Barcelona Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"L.","family":"MOLT\u00d3","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesiology, Parc de Salut Mar Universitat Aut\u00f3noma de Barcelona  Barcelona Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"J.","family":"CARAZO","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesiology, Parc de Salut Mar Universitat Aut\u00f3noma de Barcelona  Barcelona Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"S.","family":"FERN\u00c1NDEZ GALINSKI","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anaesthesiology, Parc de Salut Mar Universitat Aut\u00f3noma de Barcelona  Barcelona Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,7,26]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181604529"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0265021507003031"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2165\/00003495-200767070-00007"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0310057X0803600605"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-200603000-00023"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0006-2952(98)00088-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-6576.2005.00814.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0014-2999(03)02192-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_1","first-page":"326","article-title":"Postoperative patient\u2010controlled analgesia is more effective with epidural methadone than with intravenous methadone in thoracic surgery","volume":"50","author":"Parramon F","year":"2003","journal-title":"Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-198407000-00005"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.1998.16.10.3216"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-6576.2008.01621.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1179\/016911107X376936"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aei047"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5414\/CPP48542"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1213\/ANE.0b013e3181d8a095"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.1993.tb06914.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1460-9568.2005.04098.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD004603.pub2"}],"container-title":["Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fj.1399-6576.2012.02743.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/j.1399-6576.2012.02743.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,23]],"date-time":"2023-09-23T21:03:33Z","timestamp":1695503013000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/j.1399-6576.2012.02743.x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,7,26]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,11]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/j.1399-6576.2012.02743.x"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1399-6576.2012.02743.x","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0001-5172","1399-6576"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0001-5172","type":"print"},{"value":"1399-6576","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,7,26]]}}}