{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,1]],"date-time":"2025-10-01T15:45:41Z","timestamp":1759333541807},"reference-count":6,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,3,22]],"date-time":"2012-03-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1332374400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Vox Sanguinis"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:p><jats:bold>Background and Objectives\u2002<\/jats:bold> A targeted routine antenatal anti\u2010D prophylaxis programme was implemented in Denmark where anti\u2010D immunoglobulin is given based on the result from noninvasive antenatal screening for fetal <jats:italic>RHD<\/jats:italic>. Our objective was to evaluate compliance with this new programme right after its initiation.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Materials and Methods\u2002<\/jats:bold> We examined the treatment outcome of 239 D\u2010negative pregnant women who gave birth at our hospital between June and September 2010.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Results\u2002<\/jats:bold> The majority of these women (90%) underwent antenatal <jats:italic>RHD<\/jats:italic> screening, 86% of the women who were recommended antenatal prophylaxis received anti\u2010D, and 99% of the women who delivered RhD\u2010positive infants received postnatal anti\u2010D.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Conclusion\u2002<\/jats:bold> These compliance results are acceptable as they were obtained only a few months after the initiation of the new prophylaxis regime. However, suggestions to further improve compliance are presented.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1423-0410.2012.01602.x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,3,23]],"date-time":"2012-03-23T12:35:57Z","timestamp":1332506157000},"page":"145-149","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["Study of compliance with a new, targeted antenatal D immunization prevention programme in Denmark"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"103","author":[{"given":"M. B.","family":"Damkj\u00e6r","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"Perslev","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"F. B.","family":"Clausen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M. H.","family":"Dziegiel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"F. S.","family":"J\u00f8rgensen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,3,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_10_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1537-2995.2008.01742.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_3_2","unstructured":"CrowtherC:Anti\u2010D administration in pregnancy for preventing Rhesus alloimmunization (Cochrane review) I.The Cochrane Library issue 2 2004"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_4_2","volume-title":"Anbefalinger for Svangreomsorgen [Recommendations for pregnancy and birth]","author":"Fagredaktion"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_5_2","article-title":"Report of the first nationally implemented clinical routine screening for fetal RHD in RhD negative women to ascertain the requirement for antenatal RhD prophylaxis","author":"Clausen FB","year":"2011","journal-title":"Transfusion"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1423-0410.2004.00569.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10286.x"}],"container-title":["Vox Sanguinis"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fj.1423-0410.2012.01602.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/j.1423-0410.2012.01602.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,30]],"date-time":"2023-10-30T06:07:33Z","timestamp":1698646053000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/j.1423-0410.2012.01602.x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,3,22]]},"references-count":6,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/j.1423-0410.2012.01602.x"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1423-0410.2012.01602.x","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0042-9007","1423-0410"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0042-9007","type":"print"},{"value":"1423-0410","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,3,22]]}}}