{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,29]],"date-time":"2025-10-29T12:58:48Z","timestamp":1761742728464},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2006,3,17]],"date-time":"2006-03-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1142553600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J of Obstet and Gynaecol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p><jats:bold>Aims:\u2003<\/jats:bold> To evaluate the differences in urodynamic study (UDS) and the perineal ultrasonography parameters between stress urinary incontinence (SUI) patients with or without urethrovesical junction (UVJ) hypermobility. Treatment outcomes following a retropubic urethropexy were also compared.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Methods:\u2003<\/jats:bold> The records of 164 SUI patients (\u2264stage II), treated with retropubic urethropexy at our department between January 2001 and February 2004 were reviewed. The patients were categorized into a hypermobility group when the measured Q\u2010tip angle was \u226530, and a non\u2010hypermobility group when &lt;30. All patients underwent UDS and perineal ultrasonography (US) preoperatively. A Burch urethropexy was performed regardless of the Q\u2010tip result. All patients were reevaluated at 1\u2003month and 3\u2003months, postoperatively, and every 3\u2003months thereafter.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Results:\u2003<\/jats:bold> Ninety\u2010eight patients (60%) had an accompanying UVJ hypermobility and 66 (40%) did not. No significant differences regarding age, parity, body mass index (BMI), menopausal status, hormone replacement status, history of previous gynecologic surgery, or other medico\u2010surgical illness were noted. UDS parameters demonstrated a significant difference between the groups, but were in the normal range. The significant difference noted in the perineal US was the bladder neck descent (BND). Following retropubic urethropexy, the success rates after 1\u2003year were 94% and 91% for the hypermobility group and the non\u2010hypermobility group, respectively, showing no statistical significance.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Conclusion:\u2003<\/jats:bold> The success rates of Burch urethropexy in the two groups were similar. This result suggests that either the Q\u2010tip is an inaccurate method of evaluating UVJ hypermobility or the presence of UVJ hypermobility does not negatively affect the treatment outcome of a Burch urethropexy.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2006.00378.x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2006,3,17]],"date-time":"2006-03-17T10:37:03Z","timestamp":1142591823000},"page":"206-211","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Differences in urodynamic study, perineal sonography and treatment outcome according to urethrovesical junction hypermobility in stress urinary incontinence"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"32","author":[{"given":"Sang Wook","family":"Bai","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ja Young","family":"Kwon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Da Jung","family":"Chung","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Joo Hyun","family":"Park","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sei Kwang","family":"Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2006,3,17]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_5_2_2","first-page":"313","article-title":"Q\u2010tip test in stress urinary incontinence","volume":"38","author":"Crystal CD","year":"1971","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01920288"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_4_2","first-page":"273","article-title":"Role of the Q\u2010tip test in evaluating stress urinary incontinence","volume":"32","author":"Bergman A","year":"1987","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_5_2","first-page":"208","article-title":"Q\u2010tip test: A study of continent and incontinent women","volume":"70","author":"Walters MD","year":"1987","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_6_2","unstructured":"DietzHP.Perienal scan: Eine neue untersuchungsmethode in der Gynaecologie und Gesburtshife.Thesis University of Heidelberg Medical School Heidelberg Germany 1989."},{"key":"e_1_2_5_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s001920200066"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.125704"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_9_2","first-page":"99","volume-title":"Delancey J Practical Urogynecology","author":"Wall L","year":"1993"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1983.tb06764.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.281.6250.1243"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.1999.780102.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-199809000-00028"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000280024"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_15_2","first-page":"255","article-title":"Modified Burch versus Pereyra retropubic urethropexy for stress urinary incontinence","volume":"66","author":"Bhatia NN","year":"1985","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_16_2","first-page":"107","article-title":"Effect of urethral stretch on urethral pressure profile","volume":"15","author":"Bruschini H","year":"1977","journal-title":"Invest Urol"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ju.0000120224.67012.39"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_18_2","first-page":"193","article-title":"Negative Q\u2010tip test as a risk factor for failed incontinence surgery in women","volume":"34","author":"Bergman A","year":"1989","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(89)90169-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349309068041"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_21_2","first-page":"892","article-title":"The Q\u2010tip test and urethrovesical junction mobility","volume":"82","author":"Caputo RM","year":"1993","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-198602000-00018"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(86)90278-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_24_2","first-page":"718","article-title":"Correlation between urodynamic test results, perineal ultrasound and degree of stress urinary incontinence","volume":"48","author":"Bai SW","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jcu.1870160503"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)93705-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_27_2","first-page":"269","article-title":"Ultrasound cystourethrography by perineal scanning for the assessment of female stress urinary incontinence","volume":"68","author":"Kohorn EI","year":"1986","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(89)90115-4"}],"container-title":["Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fj.1447-0756.2006.00378.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2006.00378.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,15]],"date-time":"2023-10-15T00:11:34Z","timestamp":1697328694000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2006.00378.x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2006,3,17]]},"references-count":27,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,4]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2006.00378.x"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2006.00378.x","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1341-8076","1447-0756"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1341-8076","type":"print"},{"value":"1447-0756","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2006,3,17]]}}}