{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,14]],"date-time":"2026-09-14T20:54:33Z","timestamp":1789419273189,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2006,4,18]],"date-time":"2006-04-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1145318400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Colorectal Disease"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p><jats:bold>Background\u2002<\/jats:bold> There is little agreement on prophylactic use of drains in anastomoses in elective colorectal surgery despite many randomized clinical trials. Once anastomotic leakage occurs it is generally agreed that drains should be used for therapeutic purposes. However, on prophylactic use no such agreement exists.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Aim\u2002<\/jats:bold> To compare the safety and effectiveness of routine drainage and nondrainage regimes after elective colorectal surgery. The primary outcome was clinical anastomotic leakage.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Methods\u2002<\/jats:bold> A systematic search was undertaken to identify randomized clinical trials. Of the 1140 patients who were enrolled (six randomized controlled trials), 573 were allocated for drainage and 567 for no drainage. Outcome measures were: (i) mortality: 3% (18 of 573 patients) compared with 4% (25 of 567 patients); (ii) clinical anastomotic dehiscence: 2% (11 of 522 patients) compared with 1% (7 of 519 patients); (iii) radiological anastomotic dehiscence: 3% (16 of 522 patients) compared with 4% (19 of 519 patients); (iv) wound infection: 5% (29 of 573 patients) compared with 5% (28 of 567 patients); (v) reintervention: 6% (34 of 542 patients) compared with 5% (28 of 539 patients); (vi) extra\u2010abdominal complications: 7% (34 of 522 patients) compared with 6% (32 of 519 patients). None of these differences in outcome was significant.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Conclusion\u2002<\/jats:bold> There is insufficient evidence showing that routine drainage after colorectal anastomoses prevents anastomotic and other complications.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1463-1318.2006.00999.x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2006,4,18]],"date-time":"2006-04-18T09:16:07Z","timestamp":1145351767000},"page":"259-265","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":150,"title":["Drainage or nondrainage in elective colorectal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta\u2010analysis"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"8","author":[{"given":"A.","family":"Karliczek","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"E. C.","family":"Jesus","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"D.","family":"Matos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A. A.","family":"Castro","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A. N.","family":"Atallah","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"T.","family":"Wiggers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2006,4,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_5_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-001-0256-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.1964.01320040102017"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000052031"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1016\/S1072-7515(97)00018-5","article-title":"Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1014 patients","volume":"185","author":"Vignali A","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02090161"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02629540"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_8_2","first-page":"394","article-title":"Value of pelvic suction \u2013 irrigation in reducing morbity of low anterior resection of the rectum. A ten\u2010year experience","volume":"97","author":"Gingold BS","year":"1982","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.1800730603"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.1800800640"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.1800690313"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00000658-199902000-00003"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7425.1196"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"661","DOI":"10.1177\/014107688908201109","article-title":"Is a drain necessary after colonic anastomosis","volume":"82","author":"Johnson CD","year":"1989","journal-title":"J R Soc Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02055597"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02556495"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.133.3.309"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0039-6060(99)70205-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s101510170005"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_20_2","first-page":"266","article-title":"Effects and risks of drainage after elective colon resection. A prospective, randomized controlled clinical study","volume":"61","author":"Hagmuller E","year":"1990","journal-title":"Chirurg"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_21_2","first-page":"76","article-title":"Prophylaktische Drainage von Kolonanastomosen","volume":"11","author":"Mennigen R","year":"1989","journal-title":"Coloproctology"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0039-6109(16)38294-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_23_2","first-page":"90","article-title":"Does infection cause anastomotic dehiscence","volume":"27","author":"Gallagher P","year":"1982","journal-title":"J R Coll Surg Edinb"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1097\/01.sla.0000150067.99651.6a","article-title":"Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients","volume":"241","author":"Yeh CY","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_25_2","first-page":"452","article-title":"Is routine drainage of pelvic anastomoses necessary","volume":"62","author":"Scott H","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am Surg"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_26_2","first-page":"279","article-title":"Prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery: the cost of ignoring the evidence","volume":"46","author":"Wasey N","year":"2003","journal-title":"Can J Surg"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1006\/gyno.1995.1131"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00000658-200110000-00008"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200406000-00005"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200405150-00003"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.4435"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/08941930252807778"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02090161"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_34_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00000658-200005000-00003"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_35_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.4806"}],"container-title":["Colorectal Disease"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fj.1463-1318.2006.00999.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/j.1463-1318.2006.00999.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,16]],"date-time":"2023-10-16T07:32:42Z","timestamp":1697441562000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/j.1463-1318.2006.00999.x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2006,4,18]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/j.1463-1318.2006.00999.x"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1463-1318.2006.00999.x","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1462-8910","1463-1318"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1462-8910","type":"print"},{"value":"1463-1318","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2006,4,18]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2006-04-18","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}