{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,15]],"date-time":"2023-11-15T19:10:38Z","timestamp":1700075438705},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2007,7,28]],"date-time":"2007-07-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1185580800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Bioethics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>ABSTRACT<\/jats:title><jats:p>In 1975 John Harris envisaged a survival lottery to redistribute organs from one to a greater number in order to reduce number of deaths as a consequence of organ failure. In this paper I reach a conclusion about when running a survival lottery is permissible by looking at the reason prospective participants have for allowing the procedure from a contractual perspective.<\/jats:p><jats:p>I identify three versions of the survival lottery. In a National Lottery, everyone within a jurisdiction is a candidate for being a donor for everyone else, disregarding all differences between individuals' eventual possibility of needing an organ. In a Group Specific Lottery, it is a question of running a lottery among members of a specific group who share the same probability of getting organ failure. In a Local Lottery one randomises among individuals who are already in need of a new organ but who happen to be compatible and in need of different organs. While the first is vulnerable to considerations of fairness, it is difficult to perceive a feasible way to implement the second option that does not come with a host of unwelcome consequences. I argue, however, that it is permissible to run Local Lotteries.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-8519.2007.00570.x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,7,28]],"date-time":"2007-07-28T12:14:17Z","timestamp":1185624857000},"page":"355-363","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["SURVIVAL LOTTERIES RECONSIDERED"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"21","author":[{"given":"GERHARD","family":"\u00d8VERLAND","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2007,7,28]]},"container-title":["Bioethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fj.1467-8519.2007.00570.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/j.1467-8519.2007.00570.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,15]],"date-time":"2023-11-15T18:49:50Z","timestamp":1700074190000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/j.1467-8519.2007.00570.x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2007,7,28]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,9]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/j.1467-8519.2007.00570.x"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1467-8519.2007.00570.x","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0269-9702","1467-8519"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0269-9702","type":"print"},{"value":"1467-8519","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2007,7,28]]}}}