{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,7]],"date-time":"2026-11-07T03:55:34Z","timestamp":1794023734031,"version":"4.8.0"},"reference-count":8,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,10,31]],"date-time":"2011-10-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1320019200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Acad Dermatol Venereol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]},"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>\n \n Background\u2002<\/jats:bold>\n White shiny structures, including white shiny lines, white shiny areas and rosettes, are features only observed under polarized dermoscopy (PD).\n <\/jats:p>\n \n Objective\u2002<\/jats:bold>\n To evaluate the prevalence of the varied morphologies of white shiny structures in melanoma, basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), actinic keratosis (AK) and lichen planus\u2010like keratosis (LPLK).\n <\/jats:p>\n \n Methods\u2002<\/jats:bold>\n Retrospective study using dermoscopic images of biopsy\u2010proven melanoma, BCC, SCC, AK and LPLK.\n <\/jats:p>\n \n Results\u2002<\/jats:bold>\n A total of 538 lesions were assessed under PD. One or more types of white shiny structures were observed in 38.7% of study lesions (208\/538). BCCs were significantly more likely to display a combination of white shiny areas and white shiny lines (short lines and\/or ill\u2010defined strands) (31.9%; 61\/191) than any other lesions (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n \u2003<\u20030.001). BCC were more likely than other lesions to have white shiny lines distributed without any organized pattern (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n \u2003<\u20030.001). Lines in melanoma were significantly more likely than other lesion types to be oriented orthogonally (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n \u2003<\u20030.001). When white shiny lines were present, melanomas were significantly more likely than other lesions to exhibit short discrete white lines (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n \u2003<\u20030.001). Rosettes were significantly more likely to be observed in actinic tumours than other lesions (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n \u2003<\u20030.001).\n <\/jats:p>\n \n Conclusion\u2002<\/jats:bold>\n The presence of white shiny lines of any length accompanied by white shiny areas is most suggestive of a diagnosis of BCC (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n \u2003<\u20030.001). Melanomas are more likely to display short white shiny lines in an orthogonal distribution (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n \u2003<\u20030.001) and without white shiny areas. Actinic tumours are most likely to exhibit rosettes (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n \u2003<\u20030.001).\n <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-3083.2011.04317.x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,10,31]],"date-time":"2011-10-31T02:03:26Z","timestamp":1320026606000},"page":"1493-1497","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":60,"title":["White shiny structures: dermoscopic features revealed under polarized light"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"26","author":[{"given":"T.N.","family":"Liebman","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"H.S.","family":"Rabinovitz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"S.W.","family":"Dusza","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A.A.","family":"Marghoob","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,10,31]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jaad.2009.09.050"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archderm.144.6.828"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1524-4725.2008.34293.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archderm.143.3.329"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archdermatol.2009.28"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1440-0960.2010.00672.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archdermatol.2009.86"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archderm.142.11.1431"}],"container-title":["Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fj.1468-3083.2011.04317.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/j.1468-3083.2011.04317.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,15]],"date-time":"2023-10-15T04:37:53Z","timestamp":1697344673000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/j.1468-3083.2011.04317.x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,10,31]]},"references-count":8,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/j.1468-3083.2011.04317.x"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1468-3083.2011.04317.x","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{"has-review":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.3410\/f.715898052.791452845","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["0926-9959","1468-3083"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0926-9959","type":"print"},{"value":"1468-3083","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,10,31]]}}}