{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,7]],"date-time":"2026-05-07T12:10:39Z","timestamp":1778155839675,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2006,8,25]],"date-time":"2006-08-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1156464000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["BJOG"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,9]]},"abstract":"\n Objective\u2002<\/jats:bold>\n To compare perioperative characteristics, short\u2010term, and long\u2010term outcomes for laparoscopic Burch colposuspension (LBC) and open Burch colposuspension (OBC) for the treatment of urinary stress incontinence.\n <\/jats:p>\n \n Design\u2002<\/jats:bold>\n Randomised surgical trial with single blinding.\n <\/jats:p>\n \n Setting\u2002<\/jats:bold>\n Three tertiary level teaching hospitals involving seven surgeons of varying skill levels.\n <\/jats:p>\n \n Population\u2002<\/jats:bold>\n Two hundred women with urodynamic stress incontinence (USI).\n <\/jats:p>\n \n Methods\u2002<\/jats:bold>\n The two groups were treated in identical fashion, except for the laparoscopic or open approach to surgery. Attempts were made to blind the subjects and the observers obtaining outcome data to treatment group. Analyses were adjusted for surgeon experience.\n <\/jats:p>\n \n Main outcome measures\u2002<\/jats:bold>\n Absence of USI 6 months following surgery, postoperative pain, time spent in hospital, and time to return to activities of normal daily living.\n <\/jats:p>\n \n Results\u2002<\/jats:bold>\n There were no significant differences in objective and subjective measures of cure and in patient satisfaction at 6 months, 24 months, or 3\u20135 years of follow up between laparoscopic and open colposuspension groups. Laparoscopic colposuspension took longer time to perform (87 versus 42 minutes,\n P<\/jats:italic>\n < 0.0001) but was associated with less blood loss (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n = 0.03), less pain (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n = 0.02), and quicker return to normal activities (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n = 0.01).\n <\/jats:p>\n \n Conclusion\u2002<\/jats:bold>\n LBC has significant advantages over traditional OBC, without any apparent compromise in short\u2010term and long\u2010term outcomes.\n <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.01037.x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2006,8,25]],"date-time":"2006-08-25T19:32:12Z","timestamp":1156534332000},"page":"999-1006","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":83,"title":["Laparoscopic versus open Burch colposuspension: a randomised controlled trial"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"113","author":[{"given":"MP","family":"Carey","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"JT","family":"Goh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"A","family":"Rosamilia","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"A","family":"Cornish","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"I","family":"Gordon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"G","family":"Hawthorne","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"CF","family":"Maher","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"PL","family":"Dwyer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"P","family":"Moran","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"DT","family":"Gilmour","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2006,8,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_7_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(15)33576-6"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)90171-X"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_4_2","first-page":"526","article-title":"Laparoscopic retropubic colposuspension (Burch procedure): a review of 58 cases","volume":"38","author":"Liu CY","year":"1993","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0950-3552(05)80056-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5694\/j.1326-5377.1995.tb138404.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.02050.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(17)58997-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_9_2","volume-title":"SF\u201036 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide","author":"Ware JE","year":"1993"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_10_2","volume-title":"How to Measure in Education","author":"McCall WA","year":"1922"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.1930140206"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_12_2","first-page":"506","article-title":"The Genitourinary Treatment Satisfaction Score for continence surgery","volume":"20","author":"Cornish A","year":"2001","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_13_2","volume-title":"GUTSS: The Genito\u2010Urinary Treatment Satisfaction Scale Study","author":"Hawthorne G","year":"2000"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.321.7272.1326"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/0470846283"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/00221309809595542"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1995.tb11434.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_18_2","volume-title":"The Cochrane Library","author":"Moehrer B","year":"2003"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.325.7355.67"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.2003.00163.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.2002.811112.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000146290.10472.b3"}],"container-title":["BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fj.1471-0528.2006.01037.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.01037.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,11]],"date-time":"2023-10-11T16:40:40Z","timestamp":1697042440000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.01037.x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2006,8,25]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,9]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.01037.x"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.01037.x","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{"has-review":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.3410\/f.1046253.496186","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["1470-0328","1471-0528"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1470-0328","type":"print"},{"value":"1471-0528","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2006,8,25]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2006-08-25","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}