{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T01:02:13Z","timestamp":1787014933446,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":6,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,9,2]],"date-time":"2011-09-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1314921600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Pacing Clinical Electrophis"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>\n                    <jats:bold>\n                      <jats:italic>Background:<\/jats:italic>\n                    <\/jats:bold>\n                    \u2002\n                    <jats:italic>After pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), patients need to be followed to analyze the effect of the treatment. We evaluated the influence of the duration of Holter monitoring on the detection of arrhythmia recurrences after a single PVI at 12 months.<\/jats:italic>\n                  <\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    <jats:bold>\n                      <jats:italic>Methods:<\/jats:italic>\n                    <\/jats:bold>\n                    \u2002\n                    <jats:italic>Consecutive patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) underwent successful PVI with phased radiofrequency and pulmonary vein ablation catheter. Follow\u2010up was performed with electrocardiogram at 3, 6, and 12 months and 7\u2010day Holter at 12 months. Symptomatic patients received additional event recording. The 7\u2010day Holters at 12 months were evaluated for documented left atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrences, and each individual day with AF was categorized.<\/jats:italic>\n                  <\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    <jats:bold>\n                      <jats:italic>Results:<\/jats:italic>\n                    <\/jats:bold>\n                    \u2002\n                    <jats:italic>At 12 months after the procedure, 21 of the 96 (22%) patients had AF on their 7\u2010day Holter. In the patients with AF recurrence, there was an increase in sensitivity from 53% of a 1\u2010day Holter up to 88% with 4\u2010day Holter, and 100% of a 7\u2010day Holter. Monitoring with duration of less than 4 days resulted in significantly less detection of patients with AF compared to 7\u2010day Holter.<\/jats:italic>\n                  <\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    <jats:bold>\n                      <jats:italic>Conclusions:<\/jats:italic>\n                    <\/jats:bold>\n                    \u2002\n                    <jats:italic>A 4\u2010day Holter at 12 months has an 88% sensitivity for arrhythmia detection, and appears to provide a sufficient monitoring time. Prolonging the monitoring time to 7 days does not significantly increase the yield. PACE 2012; 35:164\u2013169)<\/jats:italic>\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1540-8159.2011.03202.x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,9,2]],"date-time":"2011-09-02T00:21:16Z","timestamp":1314922876000},"page":"164-169","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":19,"title":["Arrhythmia Detection after Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Value of Incremental Monitoring Time"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"35","author":[{"given":"ANTON A.W.","family":"MULDER","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"MAURITS C.E.F.","family":"WIJFFELS","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"ERIC F.D.","family":"WEVER","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"JOHANNES C.","family":"KELDER","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"LUCAS V.A.","family":"BOERSMA","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,9,2]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_7_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/europace\/eum120"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijcard.2008.10.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.hrthm.2008.08.037"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0765.1997.tb00544.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.518837"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/europace\/eul056"}],"container-title":["Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8159.2011.03202.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/j.1540-8159.2011.03202.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,29]],"date-time":"2023-10-29T23:19:22Z","timestamp":1698621562000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/j.1540-8159.2011.03202.x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,9,2]]},"references-count":6,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,2]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/j.1540-8159.2011.03202.x"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1540-8159.2011.03202.x","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0147-8389","1540-8159"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0147-8389","type":"print"},{"value":"1540-8159","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,9,2]]}}}