{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,17]],"date-time":"2026-05-17T06:42:14Z","timestamp":1779000134177,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,7,21]],"date-time":"2011-07-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1311206400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p><jats:italic>Objective.<\/jats:italic> To assess the risk for emergency cesarean section among women in whom labor was induced in gestational week \u226541 and to evaluate if parity and mode of induction affected this association. <jats:italic>Design.<\/jats:italic> Hospital\u2010based retrospective cohort study. <jats:italic>Population<\/jats:italic>. Singleton pregnancies delivered after \u226541 gestational weeks at Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, during 2002\u20132006. <jats:italic>Material and methods.<\/jats:italic> Of 23 030 singleton pregnancies meeting the entry criteria, 881 were induced with a Bishop score of &lt;7. Obstetric outcome was assessed through linkage with the Swedish Medical Birth Registry and a local obstetrical database containing information from patients\u2019 medical files. Results were adjusted for body mass index, age and the use of epidural analgesia. <jats:italic>Main outcome measure<\/jats:italic>. Risk for emergency cesarean section. <jats:italic>Results.<\/jats:italic> Among women who were induced, the proportions delivered by emergency cesarean section were 42% for nulliparous and 14% for multiparous. Compared to spontaneous onset, this corresponded to a more than threefold increase in risk for nulliparous women (OR 3.34, 95%CI 2.77\u20134.04) and an almost twofold increase in risk for multiparous women (OR 1.94, 95%CI 1.24\u20133.02). There was no significant difference in risk for emergency cesarean section between the two methods of induction (PGE<jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub> and transcervical catheter). <jats:italic>Conclusions.<\/jats:italic> Compared to spontaneous onset of delivery, induction of labor is associated with an increased risk for emergency cesarean section both among nulliparous and multiparous women. When labor is induced, the high risk for emergency cesarean must be kept in mind.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01213.x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,6,17]],"date-time":"2011-06-17T21:57:03Z","timestamp":1308347823000},"page":"1094-1099","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":52,"title":["Induction of labor and the risk for emergency cesarean section in nulliparous and multiparous women"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"90","author":[{"given":"MALIN","family":"THORSELL","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"SVEN","family":"LYREN\u00c4S","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"ELLIKA","family":"ANDOLF","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"MAGNUS","family":"KAIJSER","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,7,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_7_2_2","first-page":"287","volume":"117","author":"Bodner\u2010Adler B","year":"2005","journal-title":"Influence of labor induction on obstetric outcomes in patients with prolonged pregnancy: a comparison between elective labor induction and spontaneous onset of labor beyond term. Wien Klin Wochenschr"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0001-6349.2005.00620.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_4_2","volume-title":"Folkh\u00e4lsan i siffror","author":"EPC","year":"2003"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00007"},{"issue":"2","key":"e_1_2_7_6_2","first-page":"CD000170","article-title":"Interventions for preventing or improving the outcome of delivery at or beyond term","author":"Crowley P","year":"2000","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev."},{"key":"e_1_2_7_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199206113262402"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.1996.tb00455.x"},{"issue":"6","key":"e_1_2_7_9_2","first-page":"917","article-title":"Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low\u2010risk women at term","volume":"95","author":"Maslow AS","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2002.01004.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(98)00115-X"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(99)00377-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000152338.76759.38"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70265-6"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/140349489001800209"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_16_2","volume-title":"ICD\u201010: International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems: tenth revision","author":"World Health Organization","year":"2004"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_17_2","volume-title":"SAS\/STAT\u00ae 9.1 User's Guide","author":"SAS Institute Inc","year":"2004"},{"issue":"4","key":"e_1_2_7_18_2","first-page":"CD004945","article-title":"Induction of labor for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term","author":"Gulmezoglu AM","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev."},{"key":"e_1_2_7_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349709024606"}],"container-title":["Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fj.1600-0412.2011.01213.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01213.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,15]],"date-time":"2023-10-15T20:45:50Z","timestamp":1697402750000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01213.x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,7,21]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,10]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01213.x"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01213.x","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0001-6349","1600-0412"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0001-6349","type":"print"},{"value":"1600-0412","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,7,21]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2011-07-21","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}