{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,8]],"date-time":"2026-04-08T13:30:55Z","timestamp":1775655055611,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":10,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,8,29]],"date-time":"2011-08-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1314576000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Advanced maternal age may be associated with adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies. It is unclear whether a similar association exists for dichorionic twins. This objective of this study was to ascertain whether advanced maternal age was associated with increased perinatal morbidity and mortality in a 15 year retrospective review of dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA) twins delivered at Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, a tertiary referral center in London, UK, between 1994 and 2008. In all, 1 174 DCDA deliveries occurred in the study period. Maternal age was not associated with neonatal unit admission or composite fetal and neonatal mortality. <jats:bold>A<\/jats:bold>dvanced maternal age appeared to have no deleterious effect on the perinatal outcomes of DCDA twin pregnancies.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01232.x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,7,1]],"date-time":"2011-07-01T09:36:17Z","timestamp":1309512977000},"page":"152-154","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Older mothers do not confer greater perinatal risk to dichorionic diamniotic twins"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"91","author":[{"given":"EDWARD","family":"MULLINS","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"SAILESH","family":"KUMAR","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,8,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_8_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deg036"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.10.012"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019094"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000158118.75532.51"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.070150"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050902801819"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(02)03119-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/14647270903586364"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00381-010-1125-y"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_11_2","unstructured":"RCOG.Consensus views arising from the 50th Study Group: Multiple Pregnancy2006. Available online athttp:\/\/www.rcog.org.uk\/womens\u2010health\/clinical\u2010guidance\/multiple\u2010pregnancy\u2010study\u2010group\u2010statement."}],"container-title":["Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fj.1600-0412.2011.01232.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01232.x","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01232.x","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01232.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,24]],"date-time":"2023-08-24T00:29:26Z","timestamp":1692836966000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01232.x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,8,29]]},"references-count":10,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01232.x"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01232.x","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0001-6349","1600-0412"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0001-6349","type":"print"},{"value":"1600-0412","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,8,29]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2011-08-29","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}