{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,19]],"date-time":"2026-02-19T18:35:24Z","timestamp":1771526124347,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,3,12]],"date-time":"2012-03-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1331510400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract\u2002<\/jats:title><jats:p><jats:italic>Objective<\/jats:italic>. Metabolic acidosis (MA) at birth is commonly defined as umbilical cord arterial pH &lt; 7.0 plus base deficit (BD) \u2265 12.0 mmol\/L. Base deficit is not a measured entity but is calculated from pH and P<jats:sc>co<\/jats:sc><jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub> values, with the hemoglobin (Hb) concentration [Hb] included in the calculation algorithm as a fixed or measured value. Various blood gas analyzers use different algorithms, indicating variations in the MA diagnosis. The objective was therefore to calculate the prevalence of MA in blood and extracellular fluid with algorithms from three blood gas analyzer brands relative to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) algorithm. <jats:italic>Design<\/jats:italic>. Comparative study. <jats:italic>Setting<\/jats:italic>. University hospital. <jats:italic>Sample<\/jats:italic>. Arterial cord blood from 15 354 newborns. <jats:italic>Main outcome measure<\/jats:italic>. Prevalence of MA. <jats:italic>Methods<\/jats:italic>. Blood was analyzed in a Radiometer ABL 735 analyzer. Base deficit was calculated post hoc with algorithms from CLSI and Corning and Roche blood gas analyzers, and with measured and fixed (9.3 mmol\/L) values of [Hb]. <jats:italic>Results<\/jats:italic>. The prevalence of BD \u226512.0 mmol\/L in blood was with the CLSI algorithm 1.97%, Radiometer 5.18%, Corning 3.84% and Roche 3.29% (CLSI vs. other; McNemar test, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> &lt; 0.000001). Likewise, MA prevalences were 0.58, 0.66, 0.64 and 0.64%, respectively (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2264 0.02). Base deficit \u2265 12.0 mmol\/L and MA rates were lower in extracellular fluid than in blood (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2264 0.002). Algorithms with measured or fixed Hb concentration made no differences to MA rates (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2265 0.1). <jats:italic>Conclusions<\/jats:italic>. The neonatal metabolic acidosis rate varied significantly with blood gas analyzer brand and fetal fluid compartment for calculation of BD.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01364.x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,3,12]],"date-time":"2012-03-12T09:57:27Z","timestamp":1331546247000},"page":"574-579","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":28,"title":["An overlooked aspect on metabolic acidosis at birth: Blood gas analyzers calculate base deficit differently"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"91","author":[{"given":"PARISA","family":"MOKARAMI","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"NANA","family":"WIBERG","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"PER","family":"OLOFSSON","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,3,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_7_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.05.043"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_3_2","volume-title":"Blood gas and pH analysis and related measurements; approved guideline, 2nd edn. CLSI document C46\u2010A2 (ISBN 1\u201056238\u2010694\u20109)","author":"Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute","year":"2009"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_4_2","volume-title":"Reference manual for ABL\u2122 700 series","author":"Radiometer Medical A\/S","year":"2003"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_5_2","volume-title":"An evaluation of electronic fetal monitoring with clinical validation of ST waveform analysis during labour","author":"Westgate JA","year":"1993"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_6_2","first-page":"A98","volume-title":"Instructions for use. Revision 10.0","author":"Roche cobas b 221 system","year":"2009"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200611000-00058"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_8_2","unstructured":"VassarStats: Website for Statistical Computation.McNemar's Test.http:\/\/faculty.vassar.edu\/lowry\/VassarStats.html(accessed 31 August2011)."},{"key":"e_1_2_7_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(97)70080-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0009-8981(01)00427-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.earlhumdev.2005.12.005"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01708.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1515\/jpme.1991.19.3.221"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003246-200008000-00041"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0031-1271756"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340701416903"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.00886.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(01)05703-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90273-L"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2004.121"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.01098.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.01.108"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2007.097"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181dfffd6"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349.2010.513426"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.10.022"}],"container-title":["Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fj.1600-0412.2011.01364.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01364.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,31]],"date-time":"2023-10-31T11:22:19Z","timestamp":1698751339000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01364.x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,3,12]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01364.x"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01364.x","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0001-6349","1600-0412"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0001-6349","type":"print"},{"value":"1600-0412","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,3,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2012-03-12","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}