{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,11]],"date-time":"2023-10-11T06:44:17Z","timestamp":1697006657850},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2007,11,8]],"date-time":"2007-11-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1194480000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Acta Ophthalmologica"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract.<\/jats:title><jats:p><jats:bold>Purpose:\u2002<\/jats:bold> To assess the accuracy of a newly described macular function test (Vryghem macular function test) adapted to our examination equipment and to compare it to the Lotmar\u2010light interferometer for the preoperative evaluation of cataract patients at the University Eye Clinic, Geneva, Switzerland.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Methods:\u2002<\/jats:bold> This prospective study included 71 consecutive patients (72 eyes) who were undergoing uneventful cataract surgery. Testing with the Lotmar\u2010light interferometer and an adapted form of Vryghem macular function test (AVMFT) using a Birkhauser reading chart, a hyperaddition of +8\u2003D and halogen illumination were performed to assess macular function and to predict postoperative visual acuity (VA). The duration of each test and the density and location of lens opacities were also noted. Best\u2010corrected postoperative VA was compared to the predicted values of each test.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Results:\u2002<\/jats:bold> The positive predictive value was 94.2% for AVMFT compared to 92.2% for the Lotmar\u2010light interferometer. The negative predictive value was 50% for AVMFT compared to 42.9% for the Lotmar\u2010light interferometer. The sensitivity was 83.1% for AVMFT and 79.7% for the Lotmar\u2010light interferometer. The specificity was 76.9% for AVMFT and 69.2% for the Lotmar\u2010light interferometer. The correlation coefficient for AVMFT and preoperative Lotmar results (both in LogMAR) with postoperative best\u2010corrected VA (poBCVA; LogMAR) were similar (0.74 and 0.77 respectively).<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Conclusion:\u2002<\/jats:bold> The results of this study suggest that AVMFT is as reliable as the Lotmar\u2010light interferometer in predicting postoperative VA after uneventful cataract surgery. The correlation coefficients with postoperative VA were 0.74 and 0.77, respectively. Both tests showed a high positive (94.2% and 92.2%, respectively) but a low negative (50.0% and 42.9%, respectively) predictive value.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0420.2007.01043.x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,11,8]],"date-time":"2007-11-08T22:04:01Z","timestamp":1194559441000},"page":"307-313","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Comparison of adapted Vryghem macular function test and Lotmar\u2010light interferometer in predicting visual acuity after cataract surgery"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"86","author":[{"given":"Dimiter R.","family":"Bertschinger","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yves A.","family":"Janin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Andr\u00e9","family":"Dosso","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2007,11,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_7_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1755-3768.1982.tb00597.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_3_1","first-page":"1321","article-title":"Significance of ERG and VEP evoked by red flash in the preoperative prognosis in senile cataracts","volume":"84","author":"Bertrand F","year":"1984","journal-title":"Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0146-2776(85)80138-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1442-9071.2000.00349.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0420.2005.00473.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.1980.01020040630008"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_8_1","first-page":"247","article-title":"Evaluation of macular function by Lotmar\u2019s visometer test and blue\u2010field entoptic test in patients with cataract","volume":"20","author":"Grignolo FM","year":"1988","journal-title":"Ann Ophthalmol"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(00)00409-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(98)98042-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(99)80058-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(95)30921-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_13_1","first-page":"490","article-title":"The measurement of visual acuity by interference fringes","volume":"200","author":"Le Grand Y","year":"1935","journal-title":"CR Acad Sci"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(01)01118-X"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.1995.01100020031024"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_16_1","volume-title":"Cataract surgery: a literature review and ratings of appropriateness and cruciality","author":"Lee PPKC","year":"1993"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1364\/AO.11.001266"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_18_1","first-page":"393","article-title":"Apparatus for the measurement of retinal visual acuity by Moir\u00e9 fringes","volume":"19","author":"Lotmar W","year":"1980","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(97)80321-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0420.2006.00707.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00005650-199212000-00004"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(99)00706-X"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_23_1","first-page":"121","article-title":"Evaluation of the macular function in cataractous eyes by means of the Blue Field Entoptoscope","volume":"201","author":"Miris R","year":"1982","journal-title":"Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(99)00135-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00417-001-0390-6"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0420.2005.00407.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00213657"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1442-9071.2002.00522.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_29_1","first-page":"1","article-title":"Comparison of the potential acuity meter and the visometer in cataract patients","volume":"4","author":"Reid O","year":"2005","journal-title":"Eye"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.04-1138"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_31_1","first-page":"481","article-title":"Presurgical prediction of postsurgical visual acuity in patients with media opacities","volume":"59","author":"Sherman J","year":"1988","journal-title":"J Am Optom Assoc"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.1979.01020010546007"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.1986.01050140050018"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.1994.01090170074026"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_35_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2005.03.080"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0420.2005.00564.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2004.05.052"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2004.05.006"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_39_1","first-page":"21","article-title":"The significance of testing preoperative visual function in cataract using laser interferometric visual acuity and ERG","volume":"7","author":"Wu DZ","year":"1991","journal-title":"Yan Ke Xue Bao"}],"container-title":["Acta Ophthalmologica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fj.1600-0420.2007.01043.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/j.1600-0420.2007.01043.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,10]],"date-time":"2023-10-10T22:15:51Z","timestamp":1696976151000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/j.1600-0420.2007.01043.x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2007,11,8]]},"references-count":38,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/j.1600-0420.2007.01043.x"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1600-0420.2007.01043.x","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1755-375X","1755-3768"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1755-375X","type":"print"},{"value":"1755-3768","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2007,11,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2007-11-08","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}