{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,24]],"date-time":"2026-06-24T16:18:49Z","timestamp":1782317929501,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,7,11]],"date-time":"2011-07-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1310342400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Clin Implant Dent Rel Res"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>ABSTRACT<\/jats:title><jats:p><jats:bold>Aim:<\/jats:bold> The aim of this study was to assess the performance of conventional rotative instruments and a piezoelectric device for maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery, and to assess whether application of a resorbable membrane reduces resorption of an augmented site in a randomized clinical trial.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Materials and Methods:<\/jats:bold> Thirty\u2010six consecutive patients (59.2\u2003\u00b1\u200310.7 years, range 38\u201376 years) needing bilateral sinus floor elevation surgery agreed to participate in this study. In a parallel split mouth design randomized clinical trial, in which the allocation of the surgical technique to be used on the determined sites was randomly assigned, one site was always treated with conventional rotative instruments (control group) and the other site with piezosurgery (test group). In addition, in a random order, the grafted sites were covered with a collagen membrane or no membrane. After a healing period of 3\u20134 months implants were placed.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Results:<\/jats:bold> Comparison of clinical features of the test and control sites revealed no differences with regard to wound healing and complications (perforations of the sinus membrane) during or postsurgery (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2003=\u2003.458, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2003=\u20031.0, respectively). A clinically insignificant, but statistically shorter operation time was observed when using conventional rotative instruments (11.1\u2003\u00b1\u20032.4 minutes) than using piezosurgery (15.1\u2003\u00b1\u20032.9 minutes; <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2003&lt;\u2003.001). In both groups, application of a resorbable membrane did not result in less horizontal bone resorption (membrane: 1.43\u2003mm, no membrane: 1.06\u2003mm; <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2003=\u2003.062); All 193 implants could be placed with primary stability. One year after functional loading, survival rate was 100%.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Conclusion:<\/jats:bold> It can be concluded that, for maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery, a piezoelectric device shows no advantages over rotative instruments as well as that placement of a barrier membrane did not reduce resorption of the augmented site.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1708-8208.2011.00364.x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,7,11]],"date-time":"2011-07-11T15:30:13Z","timestamp":1310398213000},"page":"297-302","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":34,"title":["Comparison between Conventional and Piezoelectric Surgical Tools for Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"15","author":[{"given":"Daniela","family":"Rickert","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Arjan","family":"Vissink","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"James J.R. Huddleston","family":"Slater","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Henny J.A.","family":"Meijer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gerry M.","family":"Raghoebar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,7,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_5_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2004.01055.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_3_2","first-page":"613","article-title":"Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone","volume":"38","author":"Boyne PJ","year":"1980","journal-title":"J Oral Surg"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0011-8532(22)02107-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2004.75.4.511"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-051X.2008.01272.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_7_2","first-page":"207","article-title":"Technological characteristics and clinical indications of piezoelectric bone surgery","volume":"53","author":"Vercellotti T","year":"2004","journal-title":"Minerva Stomatol"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjoms.2004.04.006"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_9_2","first-page":"413","article-title":"Schneiderian membrane perforation rate during sinus elevation using piezosurgery: clinical results of 100 consecutive cases","volume":"27","author":"Wallace SS","year":"2007","journal-title":"Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0901-5027(88)80047-X"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_11_2","first-page":"561","article-title":"The piezoelectric bony window osteotomy and sinus membrane elevation: introduction of a new technique for simplification of the sinus augmentation procedure","volume":"21","author":"Vercellotti T","year":"2001","journal-title":"Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0501.2001.012003279.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-051X.2010.01555.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2005.01234.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2007.01498.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijom.2005.12.006"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joms.2007.06.633"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_18_2","first-page":"697","article-title":"Ultrasonic ostectomy for the surgical approach of the maxillary sinus: a technical note","volume":"13","author":"Torrella F","year":"1998","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joms.2005.10.031"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/154405910808701107"}],"container-title":["Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fj.1708-8208.2011.00364.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/j.1708-8208.2011.00364.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,18]],"date-time":"2023-10-18T04:22:54Z","timestamp":1697602974000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/j.1708-8208.2011.00364.x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,7,11]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,4]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/j.1708-8208.2011.00364.x"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1708-8208.2011.00364.x","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1523-0899","1708-8208"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1523-0899","type":"print"},{"value":"1708-8208","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,7,11]]}}}