{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,13]],"date-time":"2025-11-13T01:49:15Z","timestamp":1762998555099},"reference-count":7,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2006,4,25]],"date-time":"2006-04-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1145923200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Vet Radiology Ultrasound"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>T2\u2010weighted fast spin echo and conventional spin echo are two magnetic resonance (MR) pulse sequences used to image the brain. Given the same scan parameters the resolution of fast spin\u2010echo images will be inferior to that of conventional spin\u2010echo images. However, fast spin\u2010echo images can be acquired in a shorter time allowing scan parameters to be optimized for increased resolution without increasing the time to an unacceptable level. MR imaging of the brain of 54 dogs, suspected of having parenchymal brain abnormalities was performed using a 1.5\u2003T scanner. Acquisition time ranged from 4\u2003min 24\u2003s to 7\u2003min 16\u2003s (average=5\u2003min 15\u2003s) for fast spin\u2010echo scans and from 6\u2003min 32\u2003s to 11\u2003min 26\u2003s (average=7\u2003min 55\u2003s) for conventional spin\u2010echo scans. All reviewers consistently rated the resolution of fast spin\u2010echo images higher than the conventional spin\u2010echo images (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>=0.000). The potential disadvantages of fast spin\u2010echo acquisitions (motion artifacts, blurring, and increased hyperintensity of fat) did not affect the resolution of the images. Fast spin echo offers increased resolution in a comparable time to conventional spin echo by increased number of excitations and finer matrix size, thus improving the signal\u2010to\u2010noise ratio and spatial resolution, respectively.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1740-8261.2006.00135.x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2006,4,25]],"date-time":"2006-04-25T16:29:07Z","timestamp":1145982547000},"page":"249-253","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL SPIN\u2010ECHO AND FAST SPIN\u2010ECHO MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN THE CANINE BRAIN"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"47","author":[{"given":"JAIME E.","family":"SAGE","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"VALERIE F.","family":"SAMII","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"CARLEY J.","family":"ABRAMSON","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"ERIC M.","family":"GREEN","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"MARK","family":"SMITH","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"CHERYL","family":"DINGUS","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2006,4,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_2","first-page":"124","article-title":"Comparison of fast spin\u2010echo and conventional spin\u2010echo magnetic resonance spinal imaging techniques in four normal dogs","volume":"41","author":"Miyabayashi T","year":"2000","journal-title":"Vet RadiolUltrasound"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_2","first-page":"27","volume-title":"MRI from picture to proton","author":"McRobbie D","year":"2001"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jmri.1093"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_2","first-page":"293","article-title":"Optimisation of unenhanced MRI for detection of lesions in multiple sclerosis","volume":"40","author":"Tubridy N","year":"1998","journal-title":"a comparison of five pulse sequences with variable slice thickness"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00612125"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_2","first-page":"355","article-title":"Sagittal MR of multiple sclerosis in the spinal cord","volume":"19","author":"Nijeholt G","year":"1998","journal-title":"fast versus conventional spin echo imaging"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01372107"}],"container-title":["Veterinary Radiology &amp; Ultrasound"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fj.1740-8261.2006.00135.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/j.1740-8261.2006.00135.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,12]],"date-time":"2023-10-12T14:52:40Z","timestamp":1697122360000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/j.1740-8261.2006.00135.x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2006,4,25]]},"references-count":7,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/j.1740-8261.2006.00135.x"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1740-8261.2006.00135.x","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1058-8183","1740-8261"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1058-8183","type":"print"},{"value":"1740-8261","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2006,4,25]]}}}