{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,18]],"date-time":"2026-01-18T06:36:40Z","timestamp":1768718200765,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,23]],"date-time":"2012-12-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1356220800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Journal of Advanced Nursing"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Aims<\/jats:title><jats:p>To determine which method of intermittent urinary catheterization, sterile with a catheterization\u2010set or the no\u2010touch method, offers the most advantages for caregivers in a hospital setting<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Background<\/jats:title><jats:p>The no\u2010touch catheter is assumed to decrease the risk for infection and increase the comfort for caregivers due to its construction, however, evidence is lacking<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design<\/jats:title><jats:p>A cross\u2010over experimental study was carried out from <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">O<\/jats:styled-content>ctober until <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">D<\/jats:styled-content>ecember 2009, 100 nurses and 71 nursing students participated.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Method<\/jats:title><jats:p>Every participant had to catheterize as well according to the no\u2010touch method as to the standard intermittent catheterization method. A randomization programme determined whether the subjects had to catheterize a male or female simulation model.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Findings<\/jats:title><jats:p>Multiple regression analysis shows that nurses and nursing students appear to make on average two more errors with the sterile intermittent catheterization method with set than with the no\u2010touch method. The duration of the no\u2010touch method is 92\u00a0seconds less than the classical catheterization method. On a scale with 10 points for comfort, the classical sterile method with set scored on average two points lower than the no\u2010touch method, as well for the nurses as for the students.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title><jats:p>Compared with the classical method, both students and nurses spend less time on performing the no\u2010touch method, less sterility errors are made and a higher score is assigned to the no\u2010touch method. Also classical catheterization of men implies higher costs compared with the no\u2010touch method. No\u2010touch intermittent catheterization is thus expected to be preferred above the gold standard catheterization method.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/jan.12062","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,24]],"date-time":"2012-12-24T04:38:58Z","timestamp":1356323938000},"page":"2000-2007","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["No\u2010touch intermittent catheterization: caregiver point of view on sterility errors, duration, comfort and costs"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"69","author":[{"given":"An\u2010Sofie","family":"Goessaert","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology Ghent University Belgium"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Stephanie","family":"Antoons","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology Ghent University Belgium"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Melissa","family":"Van Den Driessche","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology Ghent University Belgium"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ali","family":"Tourchi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Pediatric Urology Research Center Tehran University of Medical Sciences Iran"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ronny","family":"Pieters","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology Ghent University Belgium"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Karel","family":"Everaert","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology Ghent University Belgium"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_12_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/sc.1995.17"},{"key":"e_1_2_12_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1054\/arth.2001.25547"},{"key":"e_1_2_12_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/j.2048-7940.1993.tb00774.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_12_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2005.07.018"},{"key":"e_1_2_12_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.WON.0000270824.37436.f6"},{"key":"e_1_2_12_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/acm.2007.0577"},{"key":"e_1_2_12_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1086\/650482"},{"key":"e_1_2_12_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.sc.3101760"},{"key":"e_1_2_12_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1442-2042.2008.02075.x"},{"issue":"4","key":"e_1_2_12_11_1","first-page":"CD006008","article-title":"Long\u2010term bladder management by intermittent catheterisation in adults and children","author":"Moore K.N.","year":"2007","journal-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"},{"key":"e_1_2_12_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ejsp.2420150303"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_2_12_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.7257\/1053-816X.2012.31.1.12","article-title":"Review of intermittent catheterization and current best practices","volume":"31","author":"Newman D.K.","year":"2011","journal-title":"Urologic Nursing"},{"issue":"3","key":"e_1_2_12_14_1","first-page":"CD004203","article-title":"Urinary catheter policies for short\u2010term bladder drainage in adults","author":"Niel\u2010Weise B.S.","year":"2005","journal-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"},{"key":"e_1_2_12_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijantimicag.2007.07.033"},{"key":"e_1_2_12_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1086\/501964"},{"key":"e_1_2_12_17_1","unstructured":"G.C. Urbaniak S. Plous 2011"},{"issue":"2","key":"e_1_2_12_18_1","first-page":"125","article-title":"Guideline for prevention of catheter\u2010associated urinary\u2010tract infections","volume":"2","author":"Wong E.S.","year":"1981","journal-title":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology"},{"key":"e_1_2_12_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.sc.3101348"}],"container-title":["Journal of Advanced Nursing"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fjan.12062","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fjan.12062","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jan.12062","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,1]],"date-time":"2023-10-01T17:54:16Z","timestamp":1696182856000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/jan.12062"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,23]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,9]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/jan.12062"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jan.12062","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0309-2402","1365-2648"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0309-2402","type":"print"},{"value":"1365-2648","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,23]]}}}