{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,2]],"date-time":"2025-11-02T10:30:52Z","timestamp":1762079452082},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,8,29]],"date-time":"2014-08-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1409270400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"funder":[{"name":"Dutch Society of Dermatology and Venereology"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Acad Dermatol Venereol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background<\/jats:title><jats:p>Clinical practice guideline (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CPG<\/jats:styled-content>) development starts with selecting appropriate topics, as resources to develop a guideline are limited. However, a standardized method for topic selection is commonly missing and the way different criteria are used to prioritize is not clear.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title><jats:p>To select and prioritize dermatological topics for <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CPG<\/jats:styled-content> development and elucidate criteria dermatologists find important in selecting guideline topics.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>All 410 dermatologists in the Netherlands were asked to create a top 20 of dermatological topics for which a guideline would be desirable, regardless of existing guidelines. They also rated, on a 5\u2010point Likert scale, 10 determinative criteria derived from a combined search in literature and across (inter)national guideline developers. Top 20 topics received scores ranging from 0.01 to 0.2 and combined scores yielded a total score.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>The 118 surveys (response 29%) identified 157 different topics. Melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, psoriasis and atopic dermatitis are top priority guideline topics. Venous leg ulcer, vasculitis, varicose veins, urticaria, acne, Lyme borreliosis, cutaneous lupus erythematosus, pruritus, syphilis, lymphoedema, decubitus ulcer, hidradenitis suppurativa, androgenic alopecia and bullous pemphigo\u00efd complete the top 20. A further 15 topics have overlapping confidence intervals. Mortality and healthcare costs are regarded as less important criteria in topic selection (<jats:italic>P\u00a0<\/jats:italic>&lt;<jats:italic>\u00a0<\/jats:italic>0.04), than other criteria like the potential to reduce unwanted variation in practice.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Dermatological professional organizations worldwide succeeded in developing guidelines for all top 20 topics. Respondents mostly agree with (inter)national guideline programmes and literature concerning the criteria important to selecting guideline topics.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/jdv.12686","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,8,29]],"date-time":"2014-08-29T14:36:48Z","timestamp":1409323008000},"page":"1636-1640","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Prioritizing dermatoses: rationally selecting guideline topics"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"29","author":[{"given":"R.J.","family":"Borgonjen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Dermatology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"J.J.E.","family":"van Everdingen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Dutch Society of Dermatology and Venereology Domus Medica Utrecht The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"P.C.M.","family":"van de Kerkhof","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Dermatology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ph.I.","family":"Spuls","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Dermatology Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,8,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_7_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/qshc.2.4.243"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.090449"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2010.09.011"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.17226\/1626"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2753.2007.00813.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1478-4505-8-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1478-4505-4-14"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_9_1","first-page":"1233","article-title":"Setting priorities and selecting topics for clinical practice guidelines","volume":"153","author":"Battista RN","year":"1995","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0528.2002.00060.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_11_1","first-page":"435","article-title":"Development and implementation of guidelines for family practice: lessons from The Netherlands","volume":"40","author":"Grol R","year":"1995","journal-title":"J Fam Pract"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0266462300002993"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_13_1","first-page":"1715","article-title":"Canadian physicians' attitudes about and preferences regarding clinical practice guidelines","volume":"156","author":"Hayward RS","year":"1997","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1748-5908-7-60"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0168-8510(02)00037-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6963-3-23"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/intqhc\/15.1.31"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2340\/00015555-1400"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/bjd.12072"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1610-0379.2011.07802.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_21_1","unstructured":"PloegmakersMMJ de VriesMoeselaarA WiersmaT vanBarneveldTA.Prioriteren onderwerpen voor richtlijnontwikkeling in Nederland 2010 \u2013 2012. [WWW document]2012. URLhttp:\/\/www.regieraad.nl\/fileadmin\/www.regieraad.nl\/publiek\/Actueel\/rapporten\/PRIORITERING_RICHTLIJNONDERWERPEN.pdf(last accessed: 23 August 2013)."}],"container-title":["Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fjdv.12686","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fjdv.12686","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jdv.12686","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,24]],"date-time":"2023-09-24T11:23:18Z","timestamp":1695554598000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/jdv.12686"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,8,29]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/jdv.12686"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jdv.12686","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0926-9959","1468-3083"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0926-9959","type":"print"},{"value":"1468-3083","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,8,29]]}}}