{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,6]],"date-time":"2026-10-06T14:51:47Z","timestamp":1791298307350,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":53,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,24]],"date-time":"2024-04-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1713916800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["J Esthet Restor Dent"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p>This randomized controlled clinical trial compared the clinical efficacy of self\u2010adhesive bulk\u2010fill Surefil One with a traditional bulk\u2010fill composite in class II restorations.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Materials and Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>Sixty\u2010four direct class II composite restorations were categorized into two groups. Group I, control group (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u200932): cavities were restored by Filtek One bulk\u2010fill composite with Scotchbond Universal (SBU) adhesive in self\u2010etch mode, Group II, test group (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u200932): cavities were restored by Surefil One self\u2010adhesive bulk\u2010fill composite. The study involved a follow\u2010up period of 1\u2009year, during which restorations were assessed at baseline (BL), 6\u2009months, and 12\u2009months using Federation Dentaire Internationale (FDI) criteria. Data analysis was performed using nonparametric tests. A comparison of restoration characteristics was performed utilizing the chi\u2010square test (<jats:italic>X<\/jats:italic><jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>). The significance level was set at 0.05.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>Filtek One and Surefil One bulk\u2010fill composites revealed clinically acceptable FDI scores over 12\u2010month recalls. Thirty\u2010two patients (64 restorations) were available for all follow\u2010up visits; 100% of the restorations survived. For esthetic properties, Filtek One was far better than Surefil One at all time points. However, in terms of functional and biological properties, both restorations demonstrated comparable performances.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title><jats:p>Filtek One bulk\u2010fill restorations were superior in terms of surface luster, surface staining, color match, and translucency, but Surefil One restorations performed well and were similar to Filtek One restorations; however, additional advancements and research are needed to obtain better esthetics. Furthermore, longitudinal studies with extended follow\u2010up periods are needed to assess the clinical potential of both materials.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Clinical Significance<\/jats:title><jats:p>Both Filtek One and Surefil One met the FDI criteria, with Filtek One demonstrating superior esthetic and functional qualities and similar performance regarding biological criteria. Both innovative restorative materials show potential for clinical use. Trial registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under registration number; NCT06120868:07\/11\/2023.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/jerd.13242","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,24]],"date-time":"2024-04-24T08:40:06Z","timestamp":1713948006000},"page":"1311-1325","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["Comparative clinical evaluation between self\u2010adhesive and conventional bulk\u2010fill composites in class II cavities: A 1\u2010year randomized controlled clinical study"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"36","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0001-0835-2487","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mohamed S.","family":"Ellithy","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry Alexandria University  Alexandria Egypt"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mohamed H.","family":"Abdelrahman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry Alexandria University  Alexandria Egypt"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3747-3568","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Rania R.","family":"Afifi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry Alexandria University  Alexandria Egypt"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_8_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0022034514544217"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2014.01.009"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2015.05.001"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1590\/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0056"},{"issue":"2","key":"e_1_2_8_6_1","first-page":"95","article-title":"Bulk\u2010fill composites: a review of the current literature","volume":"19","author":"Van Ende A","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Adhes Dent"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.bdj.2017.214"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2015.01.010"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2013.07.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2014.12.010"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/ma14030492"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2005.12.002"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_2_8_13_1","first-page":"69","article-title":"Self\u2010adhesive luting of partial ceramic crowns: selective enamel etching leads to higher survival after 6.5\u2009years in vivo","volume":"18","author":"Baader K","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Adhes Dent"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-017-2271-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0022034517729134"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2341\/13-070-LIT"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2015.02.005"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2016.11.010"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2341\/15-365-L"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10266-017-0324-3"},{"issue":"4","key":"e_1_2_8_21_1","first-page":"361","article-title":"Six\u2010month clinical evaluation of a self\u2010adhesive flowable composite in noncarious cervical lesions","volume":"17","author":"\u00c7elik EU","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Adhes Dent"},{"issue":"4","key":"e_1_2_8_22_1","first-page":"295","article-title":"On our way towards self\u2010adhesive restorative materials?","volume":"21","author":"Van Meerbeek B","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Adhes Dent"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_2_8_23_1","first-page":"53","article-title":"Bond strength, microleakage, microgaps, and marginal adaptation of self\u2010adhesive resin composites to tooth substrates with and without preconditioning with universal adhesives","volume":"26","author":"Elraggal A","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Adhes Dent"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_2_8_24_1","first-page":"35","article-title":"Development of novel polymer Technology for a new Class of restorative dental materials","volume":"22","author":"Klee JE","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Adhes Dent"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_25_1","volume-title":"Criteria for the Clinical Evaluation of Dental Restorative Materials","author":"Cvar JF","year":"1971"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-006-0095-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-010-0432-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4103\/0976-500X.72352"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/cdoe.12025"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_30_1","volume-title":"Medical Statistics at a Glance","author":"Petrie A","year":"2009"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2017.10.007"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2341\/13-045-C"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_2_8_33_1","first-page":"122","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies in cervical lesions: 12\u2010month results","volume":"10","author":"De Paula E","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Esthet Dent"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2015.07.005"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_35_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-022-07965-z"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2015.04.003"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2016.05.009"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2017.09.012"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_39_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-011-0565-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_40_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-015-1591-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_41_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2341\/06-141"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_42_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2004.11.009"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_43_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2023.104655"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_44_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/jerd.12394"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_45_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2341\/19-295-C"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_46_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1590\/1678-7757-2018-0132"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_47_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-021-04019-y"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_48_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2022.104275"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_49_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2022.06.033"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_50_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0109-5641(95)80035-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_51_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s007840100116"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_52_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.9790\/0853\u201013140609"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_53_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-051X.1983.tb01295.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_54_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.1974.45.3.151"}],"container-title":["Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jerd.13242","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,10]],"date-time":"2024-08-10T07:13:02Z","timestamp":1723273982000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/jerd.13242"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,24]]},"references-count":53,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,9]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/jerd.13242"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jerd.13242","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1496-4155","1708-8240"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1496-4155","type":"print"},{"value":"1708-8240","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,24]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2024-02-22","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2024-04-11","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2024-04-24","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}