{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,29]],"date-time":"2026-07-29T13:11:56Z","timestamp":1785330716221,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,8]],"date-time":"2016-05-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1462665600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J of Invest &amp; Clin Dent"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p>We aimed to compare the bicortical fixation of a palatal miniscrew in comparison to monocortical anchorage when total anchored cortical layer thicknesses are the same.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Materials and methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>Six models were designed: I, monocortical, 1.1 mm palatal cortical thickness, 8.5 mm bone height; <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">II<\/jats:styled-content>, bicortical, 0.4 mm palatal, 0.7 mm nasal cortical thickness, 8 mm bone height; <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">III<\/jats:styled-content>, bicortical, 0.7 mm palatal and 0.4 mm nasal cortical thickness, 8 mm bone height; <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">IV<\/jats:styled-content>, monocortical, 1.1 mm palatal cortical thickness, 7 mm bone height; V, bicortical, 0.4 mm palatal, 0.7 mm nasal cortical thickness, 7 mm bone height; <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">VI<\/jats:styled-content>, bicortical, 0.7 mm palatal and 0.4 mm nasal cortical thickness, 8.5 mm bone height. An 8 mm miniscrew was fully engaged in the bone and was subjected to vertical pull out until displaced 0.01 mm and 0.05 mm or horizontal traction load of 2 N.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>Monocortical fixation provides higher retention in comparison to bicortical fixations with the same total cortical thicknesses in terms of vertical pull\u2010out test. Models with bicortical fixation and thicker nasal cortex sustained lower strain energy when subjected to horizontal traction load.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Bicortical fixation of hard palate exhibit different reactions to vertical and horizontal tractions.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/jicd.12218","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,9]],"date-time":"2016-05-09T04:35:04Z","timestamp":1462768504000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Monocortical versus bicortical hard palate anchorage with the same total available cortical thickness: a finite element study"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"8","author":[{"given":"Arash","family":"Poorsattar\u2010Bejeh Mir","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Toronto ON Canada"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-3913(08)60259-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0278-2391(84)90008-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2007.01.031"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_1","first-page":"593","article-title":"Anchorage effects of a palatal osseointegrated implant with different fixation: a finite element study","volume":"75","author":"Chen F","year":"2005","journal-title":"Angle Orthod"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_1","first-page":"267","article-title":"Nasal cavity perforation by palatal implants: false positive records on lateral cephalograms","volume":"20","author":"Crismani AG","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0021-9290(02)00085-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0021-9290(03)00164-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbiomech.2008.03.007"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinbiomech.2004.04.012"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.orthres.2004.11.002"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/02533839.2003.9670836"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tripleo.2005.10.061"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_1","first-page":"763","article-title":"Mini\u2010implant for orthodontic anchorage","volume":"31","author":"Kanomi R","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Clin Orthod"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-3913(09)60060-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2319\/101707-496.1"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_17_1","first-page":"75","article-title":"An internal fixator for posterior application to short segments of the thoracic, lumbar, or lumbosacral spine: design and testing","volume":"203","author":"Krag MH","year":"1986","journal-title":"Clin Orthop"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.medengphy.2011.11.022"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2012.09.012"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2319\/122908-662.1"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2007.07.031"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_22_1","first-page":"779","article-title":"Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini\u2010implants","volume":"22","author":"Motoyoshi M","year":"2007","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2319\/070309-376.1"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.11607\/jomi.3636"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_25_1","first-page":"164","article-title":"Multi\u2010scale finite element analysis on biomechanical response of functionally graded dental implant\/mandible system","volume":"1","author":"Tang CY","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Serbian Soc Comput Mech"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/ocr.12003"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/jicd.12186"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2010.08.017"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.medengphy.2011.09.021"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joms.2010.12.006"}],"container-title":["Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fjicd.12218","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fjicd.12218","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jicd.12218","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,2]],"date-time":"2023-10-02T21:11:19Z","timestamp":1696281079000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/jicd.12218"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,8]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/jicd.12218"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jicd.12218","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["2041-1618","2041-1626"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2041-1618","type":"print"},{"value":"2041-1626","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,8]]},"article-number":"e12218"}}