{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,27]],"date-time":"2026-04-27T10:31:18Z","timestamp":1777285878822,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,1]],"date-time":"2017-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1496275200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J of Cosmetic Dermatology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Summary<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background<\/jats:title><jats:p>Growing use of cosmetics has led to an increase in the incidence of allergic contact dermatitis (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ACD<\/jats:styled-content>) to cosmetics. Patch testing helps to confirm allergy to cosmetics and pinpoint the exact offending allergens.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Aims and Objectives<\/jats:title><jats:p>The study aimed to find the frequency of positive patch test reactions in cases with suspected <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ACD<\/jats:styled-content> to cosmetics, and the common allergens responsible for it.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>This is a retrospective record\u2010based study of 58 patients, with suspected <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ACD<\/jats:styled-content> to cosmetics, who had undergone patch testing with Indian standard series and Indian cosmetic and fragrance series from January 2013 to December 2015.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>The majority of patients (60.34%) belonged to the age group of 20\u201040 years. The most common site of involvement was face (94.8%) followed by neck (22.4%). The most commonly implicated cosmetics in history were soaps (53.4%), and face creams (24.1%). The most common allergens detected on patch testing were cetrimide (20.7%) and thimerosal (15.5%) followed by paraphenylenediamine (6.9%), and fragrance mix (5.2). Positive allergic reactions were obtained in 2.12% of the patches.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Most common cosmetic products implicated for causing <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ACD<\/jats:styled-content> were face creams, soaps, and hair dyes. The principal culprit allergens were cetrimide and thimerosal.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/jocd.12359","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,1]],"date-time":"2017-06-01T05:46:46Z","timestamp":1496296006000},"page":"95-100","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":22,"title":["Patch testing in patients with suspected cosmetic dermatitis: A retrospective study"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"17","author":[{"given":"Taru","family":"Garg","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Dermatology and STD Lady Hardinge Medical College New Delhi India"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Soumya","family":"Agarwal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Dermatology and STD Lady Hardinge Medical College New Delhi India"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ram","family":"Chander","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Dermatology and STD Lady Hardinge Medical College New Delhi India"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Aashim","family":"Singh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Dermatology and STD Lady Hardinge Medical College New Delhi India"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Pravesh","family":"Yadav","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Dermatology and STD Lady Hardinge Medical College New Delhi India"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-31301-X_30"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1398-9995.2012.02834.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_1","first-page":"47","volume-title":"Rook's Textbook of Dermatology","author":"Beck MH","year":"2010"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2014\/695387"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mjd.2001.117396"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/jocd.12078"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.det.2013.09.006"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_1","first-page":"1","article-title":"Allergic contact dermatitis to preservatives and fragrances in cosmetics","volume":"16","author":"Hamilton T","year":"2011","journal-title":"Skin Therapy Lett"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/DER.0b013e3182a5d8bc"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"533","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-4362.2003.01786.x","article-title":"Cosmetic dermatitis\u2010current perspectives","volume":"42","author":"Singh S","year":"2003","journal-title":"Int J Dermatol"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0190-9622(85)70258-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0536.1988.tb02894.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0105-1873.2003.0120i.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2230.2007.02422.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0536.2001.450508.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1525","DOI":"10.1001\/archderm.1988.01670100027007","article-title":"The allergens in cosmetics","volume":"124","author":"Groot AC","year":"1988","journal-title":"Arch Dermatol"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_18_1","first-page":"165","article-title":"Adverse reactions to cosmetics","volume":"69","author":"Dogra A","year":"2003","journal-title":"Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fjocd.12359","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jocd.12359","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,26]],"date-time":"2023-09-26T22:02:13Z","timestamp":1695765733000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/jocd.12359"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,2]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/jocd.12359"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jocd.12359","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1473-2130","1473-2165"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1473-2130","type":"print"},{"value":"1473-2165","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]}}}