{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,22]],"date-time":"2026-09-22T02:25:11Z","timestamp":1790043911190,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"23-24","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,10]],"date-time":"2019-07-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1562716800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Clinical Nursing"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title><jats:p>If studies are to be valid, recruitment of representative samples is essential. In 2012, 28% of UK emergency departments met the 80% standard for recruitment to trials set by the National Institute for Health Research. Research nurses play a vital role in the conduct of high\u2010quality research, and it has been argued that dedicated research nurses are needed if clinical trials are to recruit successfully to target.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Review question<\/jats:title><jats:p>What are research nurses' experiences of obtaining consent from or for patients participating in emergency care research? A qualitative evidence review.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>A qualitative integrative literature review with a narrative synthesis of the evidence. PRISMA guidelines for reporting systematic qualitative reviews (Appendix S1) were followed. A search of five electronic databases was performed in December 2018 along with a hand search which yielded 125 citations: 10 papers and one PhD thesis met the review eligibility criteria. Methodological quality of the selected studies was evaluated, and data were extracted and synthesised.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>Three themes were identified: Access, Organisation and Timing. Research nurses encountered both general and specific barriers when seeking to obtain consent for participation in research. In particular, it was found there was lack of experience among staff of working in emergency research and with securing deferred consent. The distinction between nurse researchers with a clinical role and those dedicated to solely to research only is often not clear and warrants further investigation.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Nurse researchers with and without a clinical role can make a positive difference in recruitment to trials in emergency care. The involvement of dedicated research nurses in the consent process can increase recruitment to emergency care research. Experience of recruiting to clinical trials in nonemergency settings does not seem to help when recruiting for trials in emergency care.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Relevance to clinical practice<\/jats:title><jats:p>There is a need for greater understanding of the experiences of dedicated research nurses in emergency care settings and in particular with regard to deferred consent.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/jocn.14984","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,26]],"date-time":"2019-06-26T15:13:50Z","timestamp":1561562030000},"page":"4155-4165","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["What are research nurses' experiences of obtaining consent from or for patients participating in emergency care research? A qualitative review"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"28","author":[{"given":"Pauline","family":"Brown","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Gloucestershire Royal Hospital Gloucester UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alistair","family":"Hewison","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Nursing, Institute of Clinical Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences University of Birmingham Edgbaston UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6159-244X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Roger","family":"Newham","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Nursing, Institute of Clinical Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences University of Birmingham Edgbaston UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,10]]},"reference":[{"issue":"8","key":"e_1_2_9_2_1","first-page":"1","article-title":"Barriers and opportunities for enhancing patient recruitment and retention in clinical research: Findings from an interview study in an NHS academic health science centre","volume":"13","author":"Adams M.","year":"2015","journal-title":"Health Res Policy System"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-017-0423-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7748\/nr.23.5.8.s3"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/hrt.2006.111591"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1164\/rccm.201208-1537OC"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-017-1940-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_9_1","unstructured":"Critical Appraisal Skills Programme(2017).CASP Qualitative Checklist. Retrieved fromhttps:\/\/caspuk.net\/casp-tools-checklists\/"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/emermed-2012-202032"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(10)60835-5"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_2_9_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.36951\/NgPxNZ.2014.002","article-title":"The informed consent process in randomised controlled trials: A nurse\u2010led process","volume":"30","author":"Cresswell P.","year":"2014","journal-title":"Nursing Praxis in New Zealand"},{"issue":"5","key":"e_1_2_9_13_1","first-page":"1","article-title":"Clear obstacles and hidden challenges: Understanding recruiter perspectives in six pragmatic randomised controlled trials","volume":"15","author":"Donovan J.","year":"2014","journal-title":"Trials"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-016-1391-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_15_1","unstructured":"FDA(1996).71 Fed. Reg 51143."},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_2_9_16_1","first-page":"1","article-title":"The constant comparative analysis method outside of grounded theory","volume":"18","author":"Fram S. M.","year":"2013","journal-title":"The Qualitative Report"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1742-6723.12958"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2015-0512"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00006565-199610000-00004"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/emermed-2014-204401"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-016-1724-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00134-014-3243-6"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12910-017-0196-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-016-1323-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/acem.13142"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_26_1","unstructured":"Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Amendment No. 2 Regulations. (2006). SI 2006\/2984. London : The Stationary Office."},{"key":"e_1_2_9_27_1","unstructured":"Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) and Blood Safety and Quality Amendment Regulations 2008"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000097"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_29_1","volume-title":"Going the Extra Mile: Improving the nation's health and wellbeing through public involvement in research","author":"National Institute for Health Research","year":"2015"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_30_1","volume-title":"NIHR Clinical Research Network","author":"National Institute for Health Research","year":"2019"},{"issue":"3","key":"e_1_2_9_31_1","first-page":"162","article-title":"Researchers' and clinicians' perceptions of recruiting participants to clinical research: A thematic meta\u2010synthesis","volume":"6","author":"Newington L.","year":"2014","journal-title":"Journal of Clinical Medicine Research"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12910-016-0092-6"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1740774507084977"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2702.2006.01872.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_35_1","volume-title":"Conducting randomised controlled trials in an acute stroke unit: An ethnographic study","author":"Stobbart L.","year":"2012"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/jan.13409"},{"issue":"181","key":"e_1_2_9_37_1","article-title":"Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative reserach: ENTREQ","volume":"12","author":"Tong A.","year":"2012","journal-title":"BMC Medical Research Methodology"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_39_1","first-page":"e008522","article-title":"How parents and practitioners experience research without prior consent (deferred consent) for emergency research involving children with life threating conditions: A mixed methods study","volume":"5","author":"Woolfall K.","year":"2015","journal-title":"British Medical Journal Open"},{"issue":"45","key":"e_1_2_9_40_1","article-title":"How experience makes a difference: practitioners' views on the use of deferred consent in paediatric and neonatal emergency care trials","volume":"14","author":"Woolfall K.","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMC Medcial Ethics"}],"container-title":["Journal of Clinical Nursing"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fjocn.14984","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jocn.14984","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1111\/jocn.14984","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jocn.14984","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,9]],"date-time":"2023-09-09T05:14:39Z","timestamp":1694236479000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/jocn.14984"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,10]]},"references-count":39,"journal-issue":{"issue":"23-24","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,12]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/jocn.14984"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jocn.14984","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0962-1067","1365-2702"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0962-1067","type":"print"},{"value":"1365-2702","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2019-02-21","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2019-06-09","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2019-07-10","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}