{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,2]],"date-time":"2026-07-02T03:56:58Z","timestamp":1782964618784,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,7,22]],"date-time":"2013-07-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1374451200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J of Obstet and Gynaecol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Aim<\/jats:title><jats:p>Cesarean delivery is associated with a significantly higher postoperative infection rate than that following vaginal birth and other surgical procedures. This study compared whether antibiotic prophylaxis administered preoperatively was more effective in preventing infectious morbidity following cesarean delivery than administration at cord clamping.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Material and Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>In a randomized comparative trial, 953 women with a period of gestation of more than 34 weeks, scheduled to have cesarean section, were randomly assigned to the prophylactic single\u2010dose antibiotic administration either preoperatively (study group) or at cord clamping (control group). Primary outcome measure was postoperative maternal infectious morbidity and secondary outcome measures were neonatal complications, and postoperative maternal hospital stay and stay of neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>Wound complications in the form of indurations, erythema and discharge, were significantly fewer in the study group as compared to the control group (10\/476 vs 25\/477, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.010, conditional maximum likelihood estimate of odds ratio\u2009=\u20090.388 and 95% confidence interval\u2009=\u20090.175\u20130.805). Women in the study group also had fewer incidents of endomyometritis when compared to the control group (1.47% vs 3.56%; <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.041; conditional maximum likelihood estimate of odds ratio\u2009=\u20090.404). There was no significant difference in neonatal outcomes between the two groups. Mean postoperative stay of mothers in hospital was significantly shorter in the study group (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.009, 95% confidence interval\u2009=\u2009\u22120.368 to \u22120.052) but neonatal intensive care unit stay of neonates was similar in both groups.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Administration of prophylactic antibiotic at 30\u201360\u2009min before skin incision resulted in better maternal outcome when infectious morbidity and postoperative hospital stay were concerned, without influencing the neonatal outcome.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.12102","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,7,23]],"date-time":"2013-07-23T03:17:12Z","timestamp":1374549432000},"page":"1560-1568","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Optimal timing of prophylactic antibiotic for cesarean delivery: A randomized comparative study"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"39","author":[{"given":"Nabendu","family":"Bhattacharjee","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology R.G. Kar Medical College  Kolkata India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shyama Prasad","family":"Saha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology North Bengal Medical College  Darjeeling West Bengal India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kajal Kumar","family":"Patra","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology R.G. Kar Medical College  Kolkata India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Udayan","family":"Mitra","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology R.G. Kar Medical College  Kolkata India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Samir Chandra","family":"Ghoshroy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology North Bengal Medical College  Darjeeling West Bengal India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,7,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_7_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000255668.20639.40"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-198003001-00045"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_4_1","first-page":"436","article-title":"Appropriate technology for birth","volume":"2","author":"World Health Organization","year":"1985","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(09)61870-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_6_1","unstructured":"RoxbyP. Should there be a limit on Caesareans?.2010. [Cited 11 March 2013.] Available from URL:http:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/news\/10448034"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1386","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200606000-00027","article-title":"National Institutes of Health state\u2010of\u2010the\u2010science conference statement: Cesarean delivery on maternal request March 27\u201329, 2006","volume":"107","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199203000-00005"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_9_1","first-page":"559","article-title":"Development of wound infections among women undergoing cesarean section","volume":"72","author":"Emmons SL","year":"1988","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0196-6553(99)70088-X"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199201303260501"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/clinids\/18.3.422"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.111303"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9610(88)80213-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318197c3b6"},{"issue":"2","key":"e_1_2_7_16_1","article-title":"Antibiotic prophylaxis regimes and drugs for cesarean section","author":"Hopkins L","year":"2000","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.03.022"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.07.009"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b490f1"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.06.077"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2222.2001.00992.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_22_1","first-page":"197","volume-title":"Essential Immunology","author":"Roitt IM","year":"1988"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1651-2227.2002.tb01728.x"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_2_7_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007482.pub2","article-title":"Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section","author":"Smaill FM","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(90)90381-G"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.03.079"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(03)00984-0"},{"issue":"3","key":"e_1_2_7_28_1","article-title":"Antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean section","author":"Smail F","year":"2002","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050802220490"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.26719\/2004.10.3.277","article-title":"Ceftriaxone versus ampicillin\/cloxacillin as antibiotic prophylaxis in elective caesarean section","volume":"10","author":"Ahmed ET","year":"2004","journal-title":"East Mediterr Health J"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_31_1","first-page":"500","article-title":"Randomized trial of ceftriaxone prophylaxis in elective cesarean section","volume":"26","author":"Adam I","year":"2005","journal-title":"Saudi Med J"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_32_1","first-page":"112","article-title":"Pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone after intravenous infusion and intramuscular injection","volume":"77","author":"Scully BE","year":"1984","journal-title":"Am J Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9610(99)80302-X"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.105.1.21"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_35_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70017-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1473-3099(03)00577-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.inf.0000128782.20060.79"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1128\/AAC.20.5.634"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_39_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1520-6661(199701\/02)6:1<61::AID-MFM13>3.0.CO;2-P"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_40_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.12.063"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_41_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.106.2.244"}],"container-title":["Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fjog.12102","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fjog.12102","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jog.12102","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,1]],"date-time":"2023-10-01T14:51:24Z","timestamp":1696171884000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/jog.12102"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,7,22]]},"references-count":40,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,12]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/jog.12102"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jog.12102","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1341-8076","1447-0756"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1341-8076","type":"print"},{"value":"1447-0756","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,7,22]]}}}