{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,1]],"date-time":"2025-10-01T15:53:26Z","timestamp":1759334006833,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,26]],"date-time":"2014-02-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1393372800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"funder":[{"name":"Health Science and Technology Project of the Chinese Pudong New Area Social Development Bureau","award":["PW2009D-4"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["PW2009D-4"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J of Obstet and Gynaecol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Aim<\/jats:title><jats:p>We compared outcomes for traditional vaginal surgery with uterosacral ligament suspension (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">USLS<\/jats:styled-content>) versus transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">POP<\/jats:styled-content>).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>We performed a retrospective chart review of pelvic organ prolapse cases that occurred between <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">F<\/jats:styled-content>ebruary 2007 and <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">D<\/jats:styled-content>ecember 2011. Success rates for traditional vaginal repair plus <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">USLS<\/jats:styled-content> and transvaginal mesh repair were determined.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>As compared with traditional surgery (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u200981), using mesh (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u200990) for stage <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">III<\/jats:styled-content> or <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">IV<\/jats:styled-content> prolapse resulted in higher rates of successful treatment. However, mesh repair also resulted in increased intraoperative blood loss and postoperative adverse events, such as pain and dyspareunia.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Traditional vaginal repair plus <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">USLS<\/jats:styled-content> was an improvement on traditional surgery, resulting in a higher anatomical success rate. On the other hand, both intraoperative and postoperative complications in mesh repair could be reduced by protective factors such as the surgeon's experience.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.12279","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,26]],"date-time":"2014-02-26T02:26:40Z","timestamp":1393381600000},"page":"1046-1050","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Transvaginal mesh repair for pelvic organ prolapse"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"40","author":[{"given":"Guojing","family":"Jiang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine Shanghai Jiao Tong University  Shanghai China"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Bin","family":"Yan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine Shanghai Jiao Tong University  Shanghai China"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yu","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine Shanghai Jiao Tong University  Shanghai China"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Qingliang","family":"Ma","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine Shanghai Jiao Tong University  Shanghai China"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,26]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_7_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)60462-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318203e6a5"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181898ba9"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.07.040"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_6_1","first-page":"616","article-title":"Surgical treatment of vaginal prolapse with Prolift\u00ae mesh in patients with risk of recurrence","volume":"65","author":"Mart\u00ednez\u2010Franco E","year":"2012","journal-title":"Arch Esp Urol"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2010.03.003"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/MOU.0b013e3283548051"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1009521"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70243-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-006-0234-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0b013e3181f0bf1d"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31816a2489"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_14_1","first-page":"82","article-title":"Pelvic organ prolapse repair with Prolift mesh: A prospective study","volume":"28","author":"De Cuyper EM","year":"2009","journal-title":"Pelviperineology"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.06.109"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(92)91562-O"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000139514.90897.07"}],"container-title":["Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fjog.12279","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fjog.12279","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jog.12279","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,30]],"date-time":"2025-09-30T06:27:01Z","timestamp":1759213621000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/jog.12279"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,26]]},"references-count":16,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,4]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/jog.12279"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jog.12279","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1341-8076","1447-0756"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1341-8076"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1447-0756"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,26]]}}}