{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,30]],"date-time":"2026-09-30T20:30:31Z","timestamp":1790800231597,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"11","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,8,28]],"date-time":"2014-08-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1409184000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J of Obstet and Gynaecol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Aim<\/jats:title><jats:p>To assess three different methods in treating patients with cesarean scar pregnancy (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CSP<\/jats:styled-content>).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>We evaluated pre\u2010, intra\u2010 and postoperative conditions of 124 <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CSP<\/jats:styled-content> patients in one of the three treatment groups, of which 37 patients underwent uterine curettage by hysteroscopy under ultrasound monitoring (group 1), 28 patients were treated with methotrexate followed by hysteroscopy (group 2) and 59 cases underwent uterine arterial embolization followed by hysteroscopy (group 3). The treatment options were determined based on the patients' conditions.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>Among all three groups, group 3 (uterine arterial embolization followed by hysteroscopy) had the least intraoperative blood loss and the highest success rate with curettage, but the highest hospitalization cost. Group 1 (only hysteroscopy) had the shortest length of hospitalization and the lowest cost, but the highest intraoperative blood loss and slowest recovery. Group 2 (methotrexate followed by hysteroscopy) had the longest period of hospitalization, and other indexes had fallen in between the other two groups.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Among the three methods, uterine arterial embolization followed by hysteroscopy is the safest and most efficient method without considering the cost of hospitalization. Patients with a low level of \u03b2\u2010h<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CG<\/jats:styled-content> may consider choosing hysteroscopy under ultrasound monitoring or methotrexate followed by hysteroscopy. The advantage is low cost of hospitalization; however, patients may be under relatively higher surgical risks and lower first time surgical success rate, especially for patients treated by hysteroscopy under ultrasound monitoring.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.12468","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,8,28]],"date-time":"2014-08-28T06:05:15Z","timestamp":1409205915000},"page":"2146-2151","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":17,"title":["Analysis of the efficacy of three treatment options for cesarean scar pregnancy management"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"40","author":[{"given":"Yue\u2010ran","family":"Li","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University  Changsha China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Song\u2010shu","family":"Xiao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University  Changsha China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ya\u2010jun","family":"Wan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University  Changsha China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Min","family":"Xue","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University  Changsha China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,8,28]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000218690.24494.ce"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31819dbfe2"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(97)81930-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_1","first-page":"195","article-title":"Cesarean scar pregnancy","volume":"25","author":"Wang SN","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Pract Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_1","first-page":"638","article-title":"Caesarean section scar pregnancy: A case series at a single tertiary centre","volume":"53","author":"Pang YP","year":"2012","journal-title":"Singapore Med J"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2009.03.015"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2012.06.006"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02578.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.03.021"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_1","first-page":"591","article-title":"Management of cesarean scar pregnancy by hysteroscopy combined with uterine artery embolism","volume":"46","author":"Chen ZY","year":"2011","journal-title":"Chin J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2010.08.002"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_1","first-page":"97","article-title":"Clinical analysis for cesarean scar pregnancy in 10 cases","volume":"14","author":"Ma Y","year":"2008","journal-title":"China J Endosc"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_1","first-page":"83","article-title":"Treatment and diagnosis of cesarean scar pregnancy","volume":"36","author":"Pan CX","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Int Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349.2010.512973"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.11.026"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/030006051204000533"}],"container-title":["Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fjog.12468","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fjog.12468","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jog.12468","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,2]],"date-time":"2023-10-02T09:12:22Z","timestamp":1696237942000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/jog.12468"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,8,28]]},"references-count":16,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,11]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/jog.12468"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jog.12468","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1341-8076","1447-0756"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1341-8076","type":"print"},{"value":"1447-0756","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,8,28]]}}}