{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,7]],"date-time":"2025-11-07T09:07:24Z","timestamp":1762506444649},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,11,3]],"date-time":"2014-11-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1414972800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J of Obstet and Gynaecol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Aim<\/jats:title><jats:p>Recently a miniature version of the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">M<\/jats:styled-content>onarc suburethral sling has been introduced. This paper aims to evaluate the postoperative recovery, effectiveness and complications of these two types of suburethral sling.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>This was a prospective randomized series of 50 female patients with stress incontinence who underwent either a <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">M<\/jats:styled-content>onarc or <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">M<\/jats:styled-content>iniarc suburethral sling.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>The only significant intraoperative difference was a shorter operation time for the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">M<\/jats:styled-content>iniarc (18.8 vs 22.4\u2009min). The success rates were similar at 6\u2009weeks and 6\u2009months.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>There were no significant differences between the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">M<\/jats:styled-content>iniarc and <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">M<\/jats:styled-content>onarc, except for a significantly shorter <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">M<\/jats:styled-content>iniarc sling operating time.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.12493","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,11,3]],"date-time":"2014-11-03T08:23:36Z","timestamp":1415003016000},"page":"127-131","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Randomized prospective study comparing <scp>M<\/scp>onarc and <scp>M<\/scp>iniarc suburethral slings"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"41","author":[{"given":"Andrew","family":"Foote","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Calvary Hospital  Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia"},{"name":"Australian National University  Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,11,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.3109\/00365599509180543","article-title":"Intravaginal slingplasty (IVS). An ambulatory surgical procedure for treatment of female urinary incontinence","volume":"29","author":"Ulmsten U","year":"1995","journal-title":"Scand J Urol Nephrol"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_1","first-page":"1306","article-title":"Transobturator urethral suspension. Mini\u2010invasive procedure in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence","volume":"11","author":"Delorme E","year":"2001","journal-title":"Prog Urol"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_1","first-page":"42","article-title":"SECUR System. Tension\u2010free support of the urethra in women suffering from stress urinary incontinence. Technique and initial experience","volume":"72","author":"Martan A","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ceska Gynekol"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_1","first-page":"111","article-title":"Are there health care utilisation benefits to a less invasive sling","volume":"4","author":"Erikson TB","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0030-1249952"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-010-1127-z"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1734-y"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1442-2042.2012.03147.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2010.07.538"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1605-y"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02513.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2011.05.003"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2010.11.083"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2011.01.018"}],"container-title":["Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fjog.12493","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fjog.12493","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jog.12493","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,5]],"date-time":"2023-10-05T04:34:30Z","timestamp":1696480470000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/jog.12493"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,11,3]]},"references-count":14,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/jog.12493"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jog.12493","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1341-8076","1447-0756"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1341-8076","type":"print"},{"value":"1447-0756","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,11,3]]}}}