{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,6]],"date-time":"2023-10-06T06:15:25Z","timestamp":1696572925516},"reference-count":11,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,8,27]],"date-time":"2014-08-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1409097600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J of Obstet and Gynaecol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Aim<\/jats:title><jats:p>The aim of this study was to compare the intrapartum and neonatal outcome between screening non\u2010stress test (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">NST<\/jats:styled-content>) and no screening <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">NST<\/jats:styled-content> groups in healthy pregnant women at a gestational age of 40\u201340<jats:sup>+6<\/jats:sup> weeks.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>Healthy pregnant women, with a gestational age of 40\u201340<jats:sup>+6<\/jats:sup> weeks who had received antenatal care and delivered at <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">K<\/jats:styled-content>ing <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">C<\/jats:styled-content>hulalongkorn <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">M<\/jats:styled-content>emorial <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">H<\/jats:styled-content>ospital, <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">B<\/jats:styled-content>angkok, <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">T<\/jats:styled-content>hailand, between 1 <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">J<\/jats:styled-content>uly 2011 and 31 <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">M<\/jats:styled-content>arch 2013, were included in the study. The treatment group consisted of women who had had screening <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">NST<\/jats:styled-content> while no <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">NST<\/jats:styled-content> screening had been performed in the control group. The primary outcome was intrapartum and neonatal outcome, which included stillbirth, the incidence of non\u2010reassuring fetal heart, neonatal morbidity (meconium aspiration, respiratory distress, neonatal asphyxia) and neonatal mortality. Secondary outcome was the cost\u2010effectiveness of the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">NST<\/jats:styled-content> screening.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>A total of 460 healthy pregnant women with a gestational age of 40\u201340<jats:sup>+6<\/jats:sup> weeks were included in the study. There were 228 cases in the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">NST<\/jats:styled-content> screening group and 232 cases in the no <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">NST<\/jats:styled-content> screening group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of stillbirth, non\u2010reassuring fetal heart, neonatal morbidity (meconium aspiration, respiratory distress, neonatal asphyxia) and neonatal mortality. The cost of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">NST<\/jats:styled-content> plus neonatal care was higher in the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">NST<\/jats:styled-content> screening group than the no <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">NST<\/jats:styled-content> screening group.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Routine performing <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">NST<\/jats:styled-content> at the gestational age of 40\u201340<jats:sup>+6<\/jats:sup> weeks has no benefit in intrapartum and neonatal outcome.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.12497","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,8,27]],"date-time":"2014-08-27T08:40:50Z","timestamp":1409128850000},"page":"50-54","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Intrapartum and neonatal outcome of screening non\u2010stress test (<scp>NST<\/scp>) compared with no screening <scp>NST<\/scp> in healthy women at 40\u201340 (+6) weeks of gestation"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"41","author":[{"given":"Patcharin","family":"Kiettisanpipop","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Faculty of Medicine Chulalongkorn University  Bangkok Thailand"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Vorapong","family":"Phupong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Faculty of Medicine Chulalongkorn University  Bangkok Thailand"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,8,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(03)00175-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000109216.24211.D4"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31825bd286"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(88)80005-X"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(00)00862-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD000170.pub2"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200409000-00052"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)32945-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182004fa9"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(89)90240-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-7292(95)02357-I"}],"container-title":["Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fjog.12497","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fjog.12497","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jog.12497","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,5]],"date-time":"2023-10-05T04:34:05Z","timestamp":1696480445000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/jog.12497"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,8,27]]},"references-count":11,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/jog.12497"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jog.12497","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1341-8076","1447-0756"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1341-8076","type":"print"},{"value":"1447-0756","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,8,27]]}}}