{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,8]],"date-time":"2026-10-08T23:42:22Z","timestamp":1791502942286,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,11,25]],"date-time":"2014-11-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1416873600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J of Obstet and Gynaecol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Aim<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic methods, predisposing risk factors and surgical treatment options in patients with translocation of intrauterine devices (\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">IUD<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      ).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Material and Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Diagnosis, predisposing factors and treatment of 34 patients with translocation of\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">IUD<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      was evaluated in this retrospective study.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Complaints of pain during insertion and history of cesarean section were present in 70.5% and 58.8% of patients, respectively.\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">IUD<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      \u2010related complications were detected in 52.8% of patients. Transvaginal ultrasonography was used to detect translocation of IUD in 55.8% of cases. Laparoscopy was performed in 55.8% of patients.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      There were high rates of history of cesarean section, insertion in the puerperal period and insertion by midwives in patients with translocated\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">IUD<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      . These may be predisposing factors for\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">IUD<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      translocation. The clinician who inserts the\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">IUD<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      should be experienced in this area and obtain sufficient information from the pelvic examination prior to insertion of the device. Gynecological examination should be conducted for a proper diagnosis of translocation of\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">IUD<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      . In the event that the\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">IUD<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      string is not visible in the gynecological examination, transvaginal ultrasonography should be performed. If the\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">IUD<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      is still not visible, then abdominal radiography should be performed. As soon as diagnosis of translocation of\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">IUD<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      has been established, surgical treatment should be planned. First treatment of choice should be laparoscopy.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.12620","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,11,25]],"date-time":"2014-11-25T03:22:59Z","timestamp":1416885779000},"page":"735-741","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Evaluation of predisposing factors, diagnostic and treatment methods in patients with translocation of intrauterine devices"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"41","author":[{"given":"Elif","family":"Agacayak","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Dicle University School of Medicine  Diyarbakir Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Senem Yaman","family":"Tunc","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Dicle University School of Medicine  Diyarbakir Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mehmet Sait","family":"Icen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Dicle University School of Medicine  Diyarbakir Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Abdullah","family":"Oguz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of General Surgery Dicle University School of Medicine  Diyarbakir Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ali","family":"Ozler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Dicle University School of Medicine  Diyarbakir Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Abdulkadr","family":"Turgut","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Dicle University School of Medicine  Diyarbakir Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Serdar","family":"Basaranoglu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Dicle University School of Medicine  Diyarbakir Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,11,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_7_2_1","first-page":"455","article-title":"Contraception and the current situation in Turkey","volume":"13","author":"Koyuncuer A","year":"2004","journal-title":"Reuters Health Inform"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/ejc.8.3.150.155"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_4_1","first-page":"97","article-title":"The perforated intrauterine device: Endoscopic retrieval","volume":"12","author":"Heinberg EM","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Soc Laparoendosc Surg"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(84)90068-6"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(02)00417-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_7_1","first-page":"234","article-title":"Translocated intrauterine contraceptive device: Experiences of two medical centers with risk factors and the need for surgical treatment","volume":"58","author":"Soydinc HE","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00006254-198108000-00001"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1986.tb01574.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-010-1374-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(98)00029-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-7824(92)90122-A"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-008-0882-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/ejc.8.2.122.125"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_15_1","first-page":"394","article-title":"Laparoscopic retrieval of perforated intrauterine device","volume":"11","author":"Ikechebelu JI","year":"2008","journal-title":"Niger J Clin Pract"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-7824(91)90128-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(02)00327-X"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_18_1","first-page":"1","article-title":"Mechanism of action, safety and efficacy of intrauterine devices. Report of a WHO Scientific Group","volume":"753","author":"World Health Organization","year":"1987","journal-title":"World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_19_1","first-page":"696","article-title":"The migrating intrauterine device. Case report and review of the literature","volume":"27","author":"Kassab B","year":"1999","journal-title":"Contracept Fertil Sex"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(00)00213-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(97)00161-3"}],"container-title":["Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fjog.12620","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fjog.12620","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jog.12620","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,23]],"date-time":"2023-09-23T09:38:25Z","timestamp":1695461905000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/jog.12620"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,11,25]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/jog.12620"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jog.12620","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1341-8076","1447-0756"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1341-8076","type":"print"},{"value":"1447-0756","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,11,25]]}}}