{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,30]],"date-time":"2026-09-30T18:09:44Z","timestamp":1790791784577,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,6,16]],"date-time":"2015-06-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1434412800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J of Obstet and Gynaecol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Aim<\/jats:title><jats:p>The aim of this study was to compare endometrial tissue adequacy sampling by Wallach Endocell and manual vacuum aspiration (Ipas MVA plus) in women with abnormal uterine bleeding. Pain and immediate complications from each method were also compared.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Material and Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>Two hundred and forty women with abnormal uterine bleeding were randomly assigned to two methods of endometrial sampling: MVA (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic> = 122) and Endocell (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic> = 118). The basic characteristic features of the women, the difficulty of the procedure, pain score by visual analogue scale, immediate complications, and treatment were recorded. Endometrial tissue adequacy and histopathologic diagnoses were evaluated.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>The adequacy of tissue samples was 81.1% in the MVA group and 85.6% in the Endocell group (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = 0.356). There was a significant difference in the rates of difficult procedure between the two groups (27.0% in MVA vs 14.4% in Endocell; <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = 0.016). Moderate to severe pain was significantly higher in the MVA group compared to the Endocell group: 60.7% and 19.5%, respectively (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> &lt; 0.001). Other immediate minor complications were also observed to be significantly higher in the MVA group (44.3%) than in the Endocell group (30.5%) (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = 0.028). Although medication required for pain was higher in the MVA group (23.0%) than in the Endocell group (12.0%), the difference was not significant (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = 0.130). The two most common histopathologic findings obtained from MVA and Endocell specimens were proliferative endometrium (32.4%) and atrophic endometrium (27.1%).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>MVA was comparable to Endocell in terms of tissue adequacy. Moderate to severe pain was experienced significantly more in the MVA group; however, the requirement of pain treatment was not significantly different between the groups.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.12693","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,6,17]],"date-time":"2015-06-17T03:15:05Z","timestamp":1434510905000},"page":"1246-1254","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Comparison of tissue adequacy for histologic examination from Ipas MVA plus and Wallach Endocell in women with abnormal uterine bleeding"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"41","author":[{"given":"Paphada","family":"Wanijasombutti","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital Navamindradhiraj University  Bangkok Thailand"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Arinporn","family":"Imruetaicharoenchok","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital Navamindradhiraj University  Bangkok Thailand"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Siriwan","family":"Tangjitgamol","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital Navamindradhiraj University  Bangkok Thailand"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kongsak","family":"Loharamtaweethong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital Navamindradhiraj University  Bangkok Thailand"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Napaporn","family":"Phuriputt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital Navamindradhiraj University  Bangkok Thailand"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chadakarn","family":"Phaloprakarn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital Navamindradhiraj University  Bangkok Thailand"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,6,16]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.294.6566.213"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.143"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11154-012-9220-x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2010.11.011"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_1","first-page":"157","article-title":"Postmenopausal uterine bleeding","volume":"24","author":"Iatrakis G","year":"1997","journal-title":"Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_1","first-page":"27","volume-title":"Essentials of Obstetrics and Gynecology","author":"Hacker NF","year":"1996"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1025","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2001.20.10.1025","article-title":"Evaluation of the woman with postmenopausal bleeding","volume":"20","author":"Ruth BG","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.05.018"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.2003.00191.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_1","first-page":"427","article-title":"Comparison of endometrial biopsy with the endometrial Pipelle and Vabra aspirator","volume":"33","author":"Kaunitz AM","year":"1988","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_1","first-page":"293","article-title":"A randomized clinical trial comparing Pipelle and Tis\u2010U\u2010Trap for endometrial biopsy","volume":"75","author":"Koonings PP","year":"1990","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(94)70234-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.2001.080009784.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2010.01376.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(12)90744-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_17_1","first-page":"828","article-title":"Comparison of Novak and Pipelle endometrial biopsy instruments","volume":"5","author":"Silver M","year":"1991","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2007.10.014"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00320-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(06)69742-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(03)00304-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(02)00484-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_23_1","volume-title":"Managing complications in pregnancy and childbirth: A guide for midwives and doctors","author":"World Health Organization","year":"2000"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_24_1","first-page":"29","article-title":"Adequacy of histological sampling of the endometrium: A comparison between the manual vacuum aspiration and metal uterine curette","volume":"55","author":"Buranawarodomkul P","year":"2011","journal-title":"Vajira Med J"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_25_1","unstructured":"KuruvillaA SohanK RamsewakS.Outpatient endometrial sampling as the sole primary method for assessing abnormal uterine bleeding in women over 35 years in Trinidad. [Cited 27 Dec 2014.] Available from URL:<https:\/\/ispub.com\/IJGO\/3\/1\/10161>"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.07.026"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5152\/jtgga.2013.01"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_28_1","first-page":"41","article-title":"Diagnostic endometrial aspiration with the Karman Cannula","volume":"28","author":"Suarez RA","year":"1983","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_29_1","first-page":"18","article-title":"Comparison between Karman cannula and metal uterine curette in uterine curettage","volume":"15","author":"Somboonporn W","year":"2000","journal-title":"Srinagarind Med J"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_30_1","first-page":"92","article-title":"Pain and suffering in diagnostic dilatation and curette","volume":"15","author":"Wongwisetsirikul P","year":"1992","journal-title":"Rama Med J"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2003.09.018"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2007.09.005"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2006.11.017"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2007.05.023"}],"container-title":["Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fjog.12693","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fjog.12693","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jog.12693","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,4]],"date-time":"2023-10-04T23:02:35Z","timestamp":1696460555000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/jog.12693"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,6,16]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/jog.12693"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jog.12693","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1341-8076","1447-0756"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1341-8076","type":"print"},{"value":"1447-0756","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,6,16]]}}}