{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,12]],"date-time":"2026-03-12T20:17:30Z","timestamp":1773346650827,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,31]],"date-time":"2017-05-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1496188800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J of Obstet and Gynaecol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Aim<\/jats:title><jats:p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of oral misoprostol and Foley's catheter versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labor.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>This open\u2010label randomized controlled trial included 335 women requiring induction of labor. A total of 166 women were randomly allocated to induction with oral misoprostol alone and 169 women were assigned for induction with Foley's balloon catheter and oral misoprostol using a computer\u2010generated allocation sequence. The primary outcome was rate of failure to achieve vaginal delivery within 24 h of induction.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>The proportion of women failing to achieve vaginal delivery within 24 h in the combination group was lower (11.8% vs 28.7%, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = 0.001). When the two groups were stratified according to parity, the difference remained statistically significant only for parous women. The median induction\u2010to\u2010delivery interval (13.0 h vs 19 h, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = 0.000) and the median number of doses of misoprostol used (2 vs 3, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = 0.000) were lower in the combination group. The number of women who delivered vaginally in the combination group was significantly higher (91% vs 79%, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = 0.001). More neonates born to women in the misoprostol group had Apgar scores\u00a0&lt;\u00a07 and were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = 0.016 and <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = 0.007, respectively).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>The rate of failure to achieve vaginal delivery within 24 h was lower with Foley's balloon and oral misoprostol as compared to oral misoprostol alone.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.13354","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,31]],"date-time":"2017-05-31T13:03:42Z","timestamp":1496235822000},"page":"1270-1277","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["Retracted: Oral misoprostol alone versus oral misoprostol and Foley's catheter for induction of labor: A randomized controlled trial"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"43","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4301-4544","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Samia","family":"Husain","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics Abbasi Shaheed Hospital &amp; Karachi Medical and Dental College  Karachi Pakistan"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sonia","family":"Husain","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics Abbasi Shaheed Hospital &amp; Karachi Medical and Dental College  Karachi Pakistan"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Rubina","family":"Izhar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics Abbasi Shaheed Hospital &amp; Karachi Medical and Dental College  Karachi Pakistan"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,31]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_1","first-page":"327","volume-title":"Obstetrics and Gynaecology: An Evidence\u2010based Text for MRCOG","author":"Hayman R","year":"2004"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_1","unstructured":"Induction of labour. Evidence\u2010based Clinical Guideline Number 9. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists \u2013 Setting Standards to Improve Women's Health June 2001."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-3016.2001.00337.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.plefa.2003.04.009"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_1","first-page":"2123","article-title":"Methods for cervical ripening and induction of labor","volume":"67","author":"Tenore JL","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am Fam Physician"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_1","first-page":"625","article-title":"Safety and efficacy of oral versus vaginal misoprostol use for induction of labor at term","volume":"18","author":"Abbassi RM","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Coll Physicians Surg Pak"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_1","first-page":"180","article-title":"Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter pre\u2010induction of labor","volume":"84","author":"Jagielska I","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ginekol Pol"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_1","first-page":"31","article-title":"Effectiveness of intracervical catheter as a labor preinduction method","volume":"81","author":"Patro\u2010Ma\u0142ysza J","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ginekol Pol"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.879704"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2011.591459"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.11.029"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_1","first-page":"102","article-title":"Oral misoprostol for induction of labour","volume":"20","author":"Syed S","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Coll Physicians Surg Pak"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_1","first-page":"6","article-title":"Induction at poor Bishop is justified!","volume":"6","author":"Sajjad R","year":"2014","journal-title":"Isra Med J"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_1","first-page":"899","article-title":"Preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized trial of intravaginal misoprostol alone vs. a combination of transcervical Foley balloon and intravaginal misoprostol","volume":"46","author":"Rust OA","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_1","first-page":"377","article-title":"Comparison of changes in pre\u2010induction cervical factors' scores following ripening with transcervical Foley catheter and intravaginal misoprostol","volume":"34","author":"Adeniji AO","year":"2005","journal-title":"Afr J Med Med Sci"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_17_1","first-page":"823","article-title":"Combining medical and mechanical methods of cervical ripening. Does it increase the likelihood of successful induction of labor?","volume":"41","author":"Sullivan CA","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0028-1091396"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.010"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.006"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181842087"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0035-1558094"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.02905.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.05.020"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-011-2094-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13116"}],"updated-by":[{"DOI":"10.1111\/jog.15093","type":"retraction","label":"Retraction","source":"retraction-watch","updated":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,1]],"date-time":"2021-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1638316800000},"record-id":"34512"},{"DOI":"10.1111\/jog.15093","type":"erratum","label":"Erratum","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,1]],"date-time":"2021-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1638316800000}}],"container-title":["Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fjog.13354","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jog.13354","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1111\/jog.13354","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jog.13354","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,28]],"date-time":"2023-08-28T05:28:50Z","timestamp":1693200530000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/jog.13354"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,31]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/jog.13354"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jog.13354","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{"erratum":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1111\/jog.15093","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["1341-8076","1447-0756"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1341-8076","type":"print"},{"value":"1447-0756","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,31]]}}}