{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T14:51:29Z","timestamp":1792075889636,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,12]],"date-time":"2018-12-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1544572800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["J of Obstet and Gynaecol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Aim<\/jats:title><jats:p>Endometrial biopsy is one of the most commonly performed gynecological procedures. Apart from patient safety, the most important is to obtain an adequate specimen allowing histopathological diagnosis. The aim of the study was to determine the rate of endometrial sampling failure and factors affecting the quality of specimen obtained for histopathological examination among patients who underwent Pipelle biopsy and dilatation and curettage (D&amp;C).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>Patients who underwent endometrial biopsy (Pipelle, D&amp;C) at the 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, between June 2013 and July 2017, were included in the study. The influence of menopausal status, body mass index, obstetric history, endometrial thickness, indications for the biopsy and doctors' experience were analyzed with regard to the effectiveness of the procedure.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>Overall, 895 endometrial sampling procedures were performed. Three hundred and thirty\u2010nine (37.9%) patients underwent Pipelle biopsy, while 556 (62.1%) had D&amp;C. Insufficient samples were found in 60 (17.3%) and 88 (15.8%) patients, respectively. Age, menopausal status and indications were factors affecting both procedures, while the number of previous vaginal deliveries, body mass index and endometrial thickness influenced the effectiveness of Pipelle biopsy. Doctors' experience did not influence the specimen adequacy.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>None of the methods guarantee obtaining adequate specimens. D&amp;C might be preferred in postmenopausal women. The effectiveness of both procedures is independent of doctors' experience.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.13882","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,12]],"date-time":"2018-12-12T08:29:11Z","timestamp":1544603351000},"page":"645-651","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":28,"title":["Pipelle biopsy and dilatation and curettage in clinical practice: are factors affecting their effectiveness the same?"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"45","author":[{"given":"Szymon","family":"Piatek","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical University of Warsaw  Warsaw Poland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Damian","family":"Warzecha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical University of Warsaw  Warsaw Poland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Filip","family":"Kisielewski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical University of Warsaw  Warsaw Poland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Iwona","family":"Szymusik","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical University of Warsaw  Warsaw Poland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Grzegorz","family":"Panek","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical University of Warsaw  Warsaw Poland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Miroslaw","family":"Wielgos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical University of Warsaw  Warsaw Poland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2002.01088.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_1","first-page":"539","article-title":"Comparison of the histopathological diagnoses of preoperative dilatation and curettage and Pipelle biopsy","volume":"35","author":"Gungorduk K","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Gynaecol Oncol"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-012-2438-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2014.970524"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/annonc\/mdt353"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s12094-017-1809-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_1","unstructured":"KrishnamurtiU Movahedi\u2010LankaraniS BirdsongG et al. Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with carcinoma and Carcinosarcoma of the endometrium. Version: Endometrium 4.0.0.0. College of American Pathologists.2017. [Cited 20 Apr 2018.] Available from URL:http:\/\/www.cap.org\/ShowProperty?nodePath=\/UCMCon\/Contribution%20Folders\/WebContent\/pdf\/cp-endometrium-17protocol-4000.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_1","unstructured":"Parra\u2010HerranC CesariM DjordjevicB et al. Consensus guidelines for endometrial biopsy reporting. Part I \u2010 benign\/non\u2010neoplastic diagnostic categories. Canadian Association of Pathologists. Special Interest Group in Gynecologic Pathology.2017. [Cited 20 Apr 2018.] Available from URL:https:\/\/www.cap-acp.org\/cmsUploads\/CAP\/File\/Consensus%20guidelines%20on%20endometrial%20biopsy%20reporting%20BENIGN%20Final.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_1","first-page":"243","volume-title":"Avoiding Common Obstetrics and Gynecology Errors","author":"Oprea\u2010Ilies GM","year":"2011"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2011.01633.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000444711"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.12.008"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12212"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11627.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01773.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1999.tb03460.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/014107689809100207"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jcu.20770"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(00)01792-1"}],"container-title":["Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jog.13882","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1111\/jog.13882","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jog.13882","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,18]],"date-time":"2024-01-18T05:34:04Z","timestamp":1705556044000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/jog.13882"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,12]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/jog.13882"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jog.13882","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1341-8076","1447-0756"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1341-8076","type":"print"},{"value":"1447-0756","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2018-07-09","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2018-11-12","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2018-12-12","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}