{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,29]],"date-time":"2026-09-29T18:43:02Z","timestamp":1790707382571,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,23]],"date-time":"2021-03-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1616457600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["J of Obstet and Gynaecol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Aim<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) affects 10% of couples undergoing assisted conception, often due to poor endometrial receptivity. We conducted a systematic review and meta\u2010analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of Intra\u2010venous intralipid (IVI) in improving pregnancy rates in women with history of RIF using.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL for any randomized trials evaluating the use of IVI at the time of embryo transfer in women undergoing assisted conception until September 2020. We extracted data in duplicate and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tools. We meta\u2010analyzed data using a random effect model.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      We included five randomized trials reporting on 843 women with an overall moderate risk of bias. All trials used 20% IVI solution at the time of embryo transfer compared to normal saline infusion or no intervention (routine care). The IVI group had a higher chance of clinical pregnancy (172 vs 119, risk ratio [RR] 1.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16\u20132.07,\n                      <jats:italic>I<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      44.2%) and live birth (132 vs 73, RR 1.83, 95% CI 1.42\u20132.35,\n                      <jats:italic>I<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      0%) post treatment compared to no intervention. Our findings are limited by the small sample size and the variations in treatment protocols and population characteristics.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>There is limited evidence to support the use of IVI at the time of embryo transfer in women with the history of RIF. More research is needed before adopting it in clinical practice.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.14763","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,23]],"date-time":"2021-03-23T03:55:02Z","timestamp":1616471702000},"page":"2149-2156","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":23,"title":["Intralipid infusion at time of embryo transfer in women with history of recurrent implantation failure: A systematic review and meta\u2010analysis"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"47","author":[{"given":"Michael P.","family":"Rimmer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"MRC Centre for Reproductive Health Queens Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh BioQuarter, University of Edinburgh  Edinburgh UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Naomi","family":"Black","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Warwick Medical School Warwick University  Coventry UK"},{"name":"University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire  Coventry UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stephen","family":"Keay","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire  Coventry UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Siobhan","family":"Quenby","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Warwick Medical School Warwick University  Coventry UK"},{"name":"University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire  Coventry UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bassel H.","family":"Al Wattar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Warwick Medical School Warwick University  Coventry UK"},{"name":"University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire  Coventry UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_8_2_1","unstructured":"Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority.Fertility treatment 2017: trends and figures 2019.https:\/\/www.hfea.gov.uk\/media\/2894\/fertility-treatment-2017-trends-and-figures-may-2019.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2013.05.018"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12958-018-0414-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-012-9861-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/des255"},{"issue":"4","key":"e_1_2_8_7_1","first-page":"173","article-title":"Recurrent implantation failure: the role of the endometrium","volume":"15","author":"Timeva T","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Reprod Infertil"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0052252"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1172\/JCI122182"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jri.2011.03.006"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2164-11-474"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1095\/biolreprod60.2.355"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)62012-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1210\/jcem.86.4.7418"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2018.07.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0148607100024002113"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4049\/jimmunol.171.9.4837"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0897.2008.00621.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0897.2007.00473.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000097"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_21_1","first-page":"33","article-title":"Intralipid infusion does not improve live birth rates in women with unexplained recurrent implantation failure and may increase the risk of congenital malformations","volume":"125","author":"Gamaleldin I","year":"2018","journal-title":"Br J Obstet GynaecolOral Poster Present"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2016.06.026"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_23_1","first-page":"343","article-title":"The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials","volume":"5928","author":"Higgins JP","year":"2011","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/10618600.2012.681219"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.07.080"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/09513590.2019.1631280"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.06.007"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-015-3922-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/14647273.2015.985454"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fendo.2018.00461"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4103\/0974-1208.165153"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoy007"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s43043-020-0018-6"}],"container-title":["Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jog.14763","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1111\/jog.14763","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jog.14763","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,30]],"date-time":"2023-08-30T09:06:24Z","timestamp":1693386384000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/jog.14763"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,23]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,6]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/jog.14763"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jog.14763","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1341-8076","1447-0756"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1341-8076","type":"print"},{"value":"1447-0756","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,23]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2020-08-06","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2021-03-09","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2021-03-23","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}