{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,21]],"date-time":"2026-01-21T14:42:12Z","timestamp":1769006532860,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":11,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,15]],"date-time":"2022-09-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1663200000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["J of Obstet and Gynaecol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background<\/jats:title><jats:p>Cerclage for uterine cervical incompetence can be performed by the transabdominal or transvaginal approach. Transabdominal cerclage (TAC) is indicated for women with a short cervix or a cervical laceration who are inapplicable to transvaginal cerclage (TVC). The larger the volume of tissue removed in cervical conization, the greater the rate of miscarriage or preterm delivery in the subsequent pregnancy.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Aims<\/jats:title><jats:p>The aim of this study was to compare TAC and TVC in post\u2010cervical conization pregnancies.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>A retrospective, two\u2010group, comparative study was conducted involving subjects who underwent cervical cerclage (TAC, <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u00a0=\u00a014; TVC, <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u00a0=\u00a018) following cervical conization and who were cared for at the University of Miyazaki Hospital between 2008 and 2020. We compared study subject characteristics and outcomes between the two groups. Primary outcome was incidence of preterm labor &lt;37\u2009weeks of gestation between the two groups.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>The preoperative median cervical length was significantly shorter in the TAC group (20.0\u2009mm) than in the TVC group (31.0\u2009mm; <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.01). Preoperative vaginal discharge cultures positive for <jats:italic>Gardnerella<\/jats:italic> showed a tendency to be greater in the TAC group (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u00a0=\u00a00.073). There was no significant difference in the preterm delivery rate\u2009&lt;\u200937\u2009weeks of gestation between TAC (1\/14, 7.1%) and TVC (6\/18, 33.3%) groups, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u00a0=\u00a00.10. Noninferiority test using multiple regression analysis showed that TAC is not inferior to TVC regarding gestational age at delivery, even though cervical length of TAC was significantly shorter.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Women who were inapplicable to TVC due to a short cervix still achieved an equivalent outcome with TAC.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.15428","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,16]],"date-time":"2022-09-16T06:19:52Z","timestamp":1663309192000},"page":"3087-3092","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Cerclage in surgically shortened uterine cervix and pregnancy outcome: A retrospective comparison between the abdominal and vaginal procedures"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"48","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4715-1116","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Keiko","family":"Akeno","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine University of Miyazaki  Miyazaki Japan"},{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Miyazaki Medical Association Hospital  Miyazaki Japan"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Masanao","family":"Ohashi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Miyazaki Medical Association Hospital  Miyazaki Japan"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5143-4827","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Seishi","family":"Furukawa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine University of Miyazaki  Miyazaki Japan"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8898-4857","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Hiroshi","family":"Sameshima","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine University of Miyazaki  Miyazaki Japan"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_8_2_1","first-page":"355","volume-title":"Williams Obstetrics","author":"Gary Cunningham F","year":"2018"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_3_1","first-page":"145","article-title":"Transabdominal cervico uterine cerclage during pregnancy for the treatment of cervical incompetency","volume":"25","author":"Benson RC","year":"1965","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ijc.32014"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001777"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.12880"},{"issue":"6","key":"e_1_2_8_7_1","first-page":"1327","article-title":"[Subcommittee on elucidation of risk factors for preterm birth and establishment of specific prevention methods] Souzan no risuku inshi no kaimei to gutaiteki na yobouhou kakuritsu ni kansuru syouiinkai (in Japanese)","volume":"63","author":"Saito S","year":"2011","journal-title":"Acta Obstetrica et Gynaecologica Japonica."},{"key":"e_1_2_8_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199512283332604"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.040"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.06.014"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.126959"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.05.015"}],"container-title":["Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jog.15428","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1111\/jog.15428","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jog.15428","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,22]],"date-time":"2024-01-22T06:05:50Z","timestamp":1705903550000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/jog.15428"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,15]]},"references-count":11,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,12]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/jog.15428"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jog.15428","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1341-8076","1447-0756"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1341-8076","type":"print"},{"value":"1447-0756","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,15]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2022-02-17","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2022-08-31","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2022-09-15","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}